Alyssa Larish1, Andrea Mariani2, Carrie Langstraat2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A. larish.alyssa@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has one of the highest recurrence rates and mortality among early-stage uterine epithelial cancers. Research into the clinical management of USC has begun to progress, guided by surgical and pathological advances. This article summarizes the available literature regarding diagnosis, management, and possible future uses of molecular analysis of women with early-stage USC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed was searched for all pertinent English language research articles published from January 1, 2006 through March 1, 2020 which included a study population of women diagnosed with stage 1 USC. Due to the scarcity of prospective or large-scale data, studies were not limited by design or numbers of patients. Studies performed at earlier dates were incorporated to provide context. RESULTS: A total of 86 studies were included in the review. Multiple well-designed studies have confirmed the safety of a minimally invasive surgical approach for surgical management of USC. The role of sentinel node biopsy has been validated with both prospective and retrospective multi-center data. Stage I USC is associated with a highly variable risk of recurrence, even following completion of adjuvant chemoradiation. This aggressive phenotype has been linked to high numbers of somatic copy number alterations, tumor protein 53, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase mutations, which have been shown to be predictive of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Early-stage USC demonstrates a lack of predictable recurrence patterns, with reports noting distant recurrence in patients with disease confined to polyps. Unless no residual tumor is found on hysterectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be discussed and individualized by stage and treatment goals. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: Early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has one of the highest recurrence rates and mortality among early-stage uterine epithelial cancers. Research into the clinical management of USC has begun to progress, guided by surgical and pathological advances. This article summarizes the available literature regarding diagnosis, management, and possible future uses of molecular analysis of women with early-stage USC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed was searched for all pertinent English language research articles published from January 1, 2006 through March 1, 2020 which included a study population of women diagnosed with stage 1 USC. Due to the scarcity of prospective or large-scale data, studies were not limited by design or numbers of patients. Studies performed at earlier dates were incorporated to provide context. RESULTS: A total of 86 studies were included in the review. Multiple well-designed studies have confirmed the safety of a minimally invasive surgical approach for surgical management of USC. The role of sentinel node biopsy has been validated with both prospective and retrospective multi-center data. Stage I USC is associated with a highly variable risk of recurrence, even following completion of adjuvant chemoradiation. This aggressive phenotype has been linked to high numbers of somatic copy number alterations, tumor protein 53, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase mutations, which have been shown to be predictive of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Early-stage USC demonstrates a lack of predictable recurrence patterns, with reports noting distant recurrence in patients with disease confined to polyps. Unless no residual tumor is found on hysterectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be discussed and individualized by stage and treatment goals. Copyright
Authors: Tina A Ayeni; Mariam M AlHilli; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Andrea Mariani; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; William A Cliby; Gary L Keeney; Karl C Podratz; Sean C Dowdy Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: G Scaletta; G Dinoi; V Capozzi; S Cianci; S Pelligra; R Ergasti; A Fagotti; G Scambia; F Fanfani Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Himanshu Nagar; Weisi Yan; Bhupesh Parashar; Dattatreyudu Nori; K S C Chao; Paul Christos; Divya Gupta; Kevin Holcomb; Thomas Caputo; A Gabriella Wernicke Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Thijs Roelofsen; Marjanka Mingels; Jan C M Hendriks; Rahul A Samlal; Marc P Snijders; Anette L Aalders; Johan Bulten; Maaike A P C van Ham; Leon F A G Massuger Journal: Int J Biol Markers Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 2.659