Literature DB >> 25800207

Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state.

Monica D Rosenberg1, Emily S Finn2, R Todd Constable3, Marvin M Chun4.   

Abstract

Although fluctuations in sustained attention are ubiquitous, most psychological experiments treat them as noise, averaging performance over many trials. The current study uses multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode whether, on each trial of a cognitive task, participants are in an optimal or suboptimal attentional state. During fMRI, participants performed n-back tasks, composed of central face images overlaid on distractor scenes, with low, perceptual, and working memory load. Instructions were to respond to novel faces and withhold response to rare repeats. To index attentional state, reaction time variability was calculated at each correct response. Participants' 50% least variable trials were labeled optimal, or "in the zone," and their 50% most erratic trials were labeled suboptimal, or "out of the zone." Support vector machine classifiers trained on activity in the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), and task-relevant fusiform face area (FFA) distinguished in-the-zone and out-of-the-zone trials in all tasks. Consistent with evidence that distractors are processed when central task load is low, parahippocampal place area (PPA) classifiers were only successful in the low load task. Classification in anatomical regions across the brain revealed widespread coding of attentional state. In contrast to these robust pattern analyses, univariate signal in DMN, DAN, FFA, and PPA did not distinguish states, suggesting a nuanced relationship to sustained attention. In sum, MVPA can be used to decode trial-by-trial attentional state throughout much of cortex, helping to characterize how attention network fluctuations correlate with performance variability.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional fluctuations; Attentional states; Multi-voxel pattern analysis; Sustained attention; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800207     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

Review 1.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Dustin Scheinost; Abigail S Greene; Emily W Avery; Young Hye Kwon; Emily S Finn; Ramachandran Ramani; Maolin Qiu; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modulating Reward Induces Differential Neurocognitive Approaches to Sustained Attention.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Victoria Poole; Guanyu Liu; Joseph DeGutis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Similar patterns of neural activity predict memory function during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  James E Kragel; Youssef Ezzyat; Michael R Sperling; Richard Gorniak; Gregory A Worrell; Brent M Berry; Cory Inman; Jui-Jui Lin; Kathryn A Davis; Sandhitsu R Das; Joel M Stein; Barbara C Jobst; Kareem A Zaghloul; Sameer A Sheth; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models.

Authors:  M D Rosenberg; E S Finn; D Scheinost; R T Constable; M M Chun
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Sheng Zhang; Wei-Ting Hsu; Dustin Scheinost; Emily S Finn; Xilin Shen; R Todd Constable; Chiang-Shan R Li; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural mechanisms of cue-approach training.

Authors:  Akram Bakkour; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Russell A Poldrack; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Decoupling of reaction time-related default mode network activity with cognitive demand.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.978

9.  Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention: A robust replication and extension.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; David Rothlein; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in the Flexible Control of Covert Attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Susan M Courtney; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.