Literature DB >> 27677231

Neural mechanisms of cue-approach training.

Akram Bakkour1, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock2, Russell A Poldrack2, Tom Schonberg3.   

Abstract

Biasing choices may prove a useful way to implement behavior change. Previous work has shown that a simple training task (the cue-approach task), which does not rely on external reinforcement, can robustly influence choice behavior by biasing choice toward items that were targeted during training. In the current study, we replicate previous behavioral findings and explore the neural mechanisms underlying the shift in preferences following cue-approach training. Given recent successes in the development and application of machine learning techniques to task-based fMRI data, which have advanced understanding of the neural substrates of cognition, we sought to leverage the power of these techniques to better understand neural changes during cue-approach training that subsequently led to a shift in choice behavior. Contrary to our expectations, we found that machine learning techniques applied to fMRI data during non-reinforced training were unsuccessful in elucidating the neural mechanism underlying the behavioral effect. However, univariate analyses during training revealed that the relationship between BOLD and choices for Go items increases as training progresses compared to choices of NoGo items primarily in lateral prefrontal cortical areas. This new imaging finding suggests that preferences are shifted via differential engagement of task control networks that interact with value networks during cue-approach training.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral change; Cue-approach training; Value-based decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677231      PMCID: PMC5365383          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  60 in total

1.  Decoding cognitive control in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Yu-Chin Chiu; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Beer à no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition.

Authors:  Katrijn Houben; Remco C Havermans; Chantal Nederkoorn; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Category-dependent and category-independent goal-value codes in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Daniel McNamee; Antonio Rangel; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.

Authors:  G M Becker; M H DeGroot; J Marschak
Journal:  Behav Sci       Date:  1964-07

5.  Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Neural Evidence for the Flexible Control of Mental Representations.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Temporary activation of long-term memory supports working memory.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Russell A Poldrack; Thomas E Nichols; David C Van Essen; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.

Authors:  Natalia S Lawrence; Frederick Verbruggen; Sinead Morrison; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  10 in total

1.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Using neuroimaging to probe mechanisms of behavior change.

Authors:  Tammy Chung; Marc Tittgemeyer; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Modifying food items valuation and weight with gamified executive control training.

Authors:  Hugo Najberg; Maurizio Rigamonti; Michael Mouthon; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Spacing of cue-approach training leads to better maintenance of behavioral change.

Authors:  Akram Bakkour; Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Neta Cohen; Ashleigh M Hover; Russell A Poldrack; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Promoting subjective preferences in simple economic choices during nap.

Authors:  Sizhi Ai; Yunlu Yin; Yu Chen; Cong Wang; Yan Sun; Xiangdong Tang; Lin Lu; Lusha Zhu; Jie Shi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Is ventromedial prefrontal cortex critical for behavior change without external reinforcement?

Authors:  Nadav Aridan; Gabriel Pelletier; Lesley K Fellows; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Enhanced Bottom-Up and Reduced Top-Down fMRI Activity Is Related to Long-Lasting Nonreinforced Behavioral Change.

Authors:  Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Tom Salomon; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.

Authors:  Tom Salomon; Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Shiran Oren; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A Multi-Dataset Evaluation of Frame Censoring for Motion Correction in Task-Based fMRI.

Authors:  Michael S Jones; Zhenchen Zhu; Aahana Bajracharya; Austin Luor; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Apert Neuro       Date:  2022

9.  The Cue-Approach Task as a General Mechanism for Long-Term Non-Reinforced Behavioral Change.

Authors:  Tom Salomon; Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Tony Gutentag; Rani Gera; Roni Iwanir; Maya Tamir; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.

Authors:  Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Akram Bakkour; Tom Salomon; Daphna Shohamy; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.