Literature DB >> 25796416

Circumferential esophageal replacement using a tube-shaped tissue-engineered substitute: An experimental study in minipigs.

Tigran Poghosyan1, Rony Sfeir2, Laurent Michaud3, Patrick Bruneval4, Thomas Domet5, Valerie Vanneaux6, Minh Luong-Nguyen6, Sebastien Gaujoux7, Frederic Gottrand3, Jerome Larghero6, Pierre Cattan8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement by the colon or the stomach for malignant and nonmalignant esophageal diseases exposes to significant morbidity and mortality. In this setting, tissue engineering seems to be a seductive alternative.
METHODS: In a porcine model, we performed a 5-cm-long circumferential replacement of the cervical esophagus by a tubulized acellular matrix (small intestinal submucosa) cellularized with autologous skeletal myoblasts and covered by a human amniotic membrane seeded with autologous oral epithelial cells. The substitute was grown for 2 weeks in the great omentum before esophageal replacement. Eighteen minipigs (divided into 3 groups: group A [substitute with esophageal endoprothesis; n = 6], group B [substitute alone; n = 6], and group C [endoprothesis alone; n = 6]) were included. The esophageal endoprothesis was removed at 6 months. Animals were killed sequentially over a 12 month-period. Clinical, endoscopic, radiologic and histologic outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: All animals except 1 of in groups B and C died during the first 2 months owing to refractory esophageal stenosis or endoprothesis extrusion. Nutritional autonomy without endoprothesis was observed in all animals of group A with a follow-up of >6 months (n = 3). A phenotype similar to that of native esophagus, consisting of a mature epithelium, submucosal glands, and a circular muscular layer, was observed after 9 months.
CONCLUSION: In this model, the circumferential replacement of the cervical esophagus by a tube-shaped tissue-engineered substitute under the temporary cover of an esophageal endoprothesis allowed nutritional autonomy and tissue remodeling toward an esophageal phenotype.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25796416     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Esophagus tissue engineering: from decellularization to in vivo recellularization in two sites.

Authors:  Sahar Eftekharzadeh; Aram Akbarzadeh; Nastaran Sabetkish; Minoo Rostami; Amir Hossein Zabolian; Javad Hashemi; Seyed Mohammad Tavangar; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Serial evaluation of segmental esophageal reconstruction using a polyurethane scaffold in a pig model.

Authors:  Tiffany L Sarrafian; Jennifer L Brazzell; Matthew Barron; Johnathon Aho; Ellen Blanco; Chelsea Powell; Jed Johnson; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 3.  Regenerative medicine for the esophagus.

Authors:  Kengo Kanetaka; Shinichiro Kobayashi; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Evaluation of Bilayer Silk Fibroin Grafts for Tubular Esophagoplasty in a Porcine Defect Model.

Authors:  Gokhan Gundogdu; Duncan Morhardt; Vivian Cristofaro; Khalid Algarrahi; Xuehui Yang; Kyle Costa; Cinthia Galvez Alegria; Maryrose P Sullivan; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Update on Foregut Molecular Embryology and Role of Regenerative Medicine Therapies.

Authors:  Silvia Perin; Conor J McCann; Osvaldo Borrelli; Paolo De Coppi; Nikhil Thapar
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Multi-stage bioengineering of a layered oesophagus with in vitro expanded muscle and epithelial adult progenitors.

Authors:  Luca Urbani; Carlotta Camilli; Demetra-Ellie Phylactopoulos; Claire Crowley; Dipa Natarajan; Federico Scottoni; Panayiotis Maghsoudlou; Conor J McCann; Alessandro Filippo Pellegata; Anna Urciuolo; Koichi Deguchi; Sahira Khalaf; Salvatore Ferdinando Aruta; Maria Cristina Signorelli; David Kiely; Edward Hannon; Matteo Trevisan; Rui Rachel Wong; Marc Olivier Baradez; Dale Moulding; Alex Virasami; Asllan Gjinovci; Stavros Loukogeorgakis; Sara Mantero; Nikhil Thapar; Neil Sebire; Simon Eaton; Mark Lowdell; Giulio Cossu; Paola Bonfanti; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Esophageal regenerative therapy using cell sheet technology.

Authors:  Takeshi Ohki; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.419

8.  Transplantation of acellularized dermis matrix (ADM) plus fully covered metal stent to prevent stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer (with video).

Authors:  Xian-Bin Zhou; Shao-Wei Li; Sai-Qin He; Shan-Jing Xu; Yue Cai; Shi-Wen Xu; Xiao-Kang Li; Bin-Bin Gu; Xin-Li Mao; Li-Ping Ye
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.419

9.  Circumferential Esophageal Replacement by a Tissue-engineered Substitute Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Experimental Study in Mini Pigs.

Authors:  Jonathan Catry; Minh Luong-Nguyen; Lousineh Arakelian; Tigran Poghosyan; Patrick Bruneval; Thomas Domet; Laurent Michaud; Rony Sfeir; Frederic Gottrand; Jerome Larghero; Valerie Vanneaux; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Ali Soltanian; Leila Haji Maghsoudi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.