Literature DB >> 25795420

Comparison of cell-based and non-cell-based assay platforms for the detection of clinically relevant anti-drug neutralizing antibodies for immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins.

Jenny Hu1, Iwona Wala2, Hong Han2, Janice Nagatani2, Troy Barger2, Francesca Civoli2, Arunan Kaliyaperumal2, Yao Zhuang2, Shalini Gupta3.   

Abstract

Anti-drug neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) formed due to unwanted immunogenicity of a therapeutic protein point towards a mature immune response. NAb detection is important in interpreting the therapeutic's efficacy and safety in vivo. In vitro cell-based NAb assays provide a physiological system for NAb detection, however are complex assays. Non-cell-based competitive ligand binding (CLB) approaches are also employed for NAb detection. Instead of cells, CLB assays use soluble receptor and conjugated reagents and are easier to perform, however have reduced physiological relevance. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of CLB assays to established cell-based assays to determine the former's ability to detect clinically relevant NAbs towards therapeutics that (i) acted as an agonist or (ii) acted as antagonists by binding to a target receptor. We performed a head-to-head comparison of the performance of cell-based and CLB NAb assays for erythropoietin (EPO) and two anti-receptor monoclonal antibodies (AMG-X and AMG 317). Clinically relevant NAb-positive samples identified previously by a cell-based assay were assessed in the corresponding CLB format(s). A panel of 12 engineered fully human anti-EPO monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was tested in both EPO NAb assay formats. Our results showed that the CLB format was (i) capable of detecting human anti-EPO MAbs of differing neutralizing capabilities and affinities and (ii) provided similar results as the cell-based assay for detecting NAbs in patient samples. The cell-based and CLB assays also behaved comparably in detecting NAbs in clinical samples for AMG-X. In the case of anti-AMG 317 NAbs, the CLB format failed to detect NAbs in more than 50% of the tested samples. We conclude that assay sensitivity, drug tolerance and the selected assay matrix played an important role in the inability of AMG 317 CLB assays to detect clinically relevant NAbs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-based assay; Competitive ligand binding assay; Immunogenicity; NAb assay; Neutralizing antibodies; Non-cell-based assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25795420     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  7 in total

1.  Strategies to Determine Assay Format for the Assessment of Neutralizing Antibody Responses to Biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Bonnie Wu; Shan Chung; Xu-Rong Jiang; Jim McNally; Joao Pedras-Vasconcelos; Renuka Pillutla; Joleen T White; Yuanxin Xu; Shalini Gupta
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Recommendations for the Development and Validation of Neutralizing Antibody Assays in Support of Biosimilar Assessment.

Authors:  D Gouty; C C Cai; X Y Cai; A Kasinath; V Kumar; S Alvandkouhi; J Yang; S Pederson; B Babbitt; D Peritt; A Rudy; V Koppenburg; A Dasilva; M Ullmann; S Liu; C Satterwhite
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Assessment of Functional Characterization and Comparability of Biotherapeutics: a Review.

Authors:  Rozaleen Dash; Sumit Kumar Singh; Narendra Chirmule; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Selection of a Ligand-Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Benralizumab: Comparison with an Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) Cell-Based Assay.

Authors:  Yuling Wu; Ahmad Akhgar; Jia J Li; Binbing Yu; Cecil Chen; Nancy Lee; Wendy I White; Lorin K Roskos
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Immunogenicity assessment of bispecific antibody-based immunotherapy in oncology.

Authors:  Yanchen Zhou; Hweixian L Penny; Mark A Kroenke; Bianca Bautista; Kelly Hainline; Lynette S Chea; Jane Parnes; Daniel T Mytych
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 12.469

6.  Assessment of immunogenicity from galcanezumab phase 3 trials in patients with episodic or chronic migraine.

Authors:  James M Martinez; Nada Hindiyeh; Greg Anglin; Kavita Kalidas; Michael E Hodsdon; William Kielbasa; Brian A Moser; Eric M Pearlman; Sandra Garces
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay.

Authors:  Ruby Cheung; Gregory W deHart; Lynne Jesaitis; Stephen J Zoog; Andrew C Melton
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.355

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.