Literature DB >> 19583712

After-effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: results from the TOMBOLA trial.

Linda Sharp, Seonaidh Cotton, Claire Cochran, Nicola Gray, Julian Little, Keith Neal, Maggie Cruickshank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated physical after-effects of colposcopy. We compared post-colposcopy self-reported pain, bleeding, discharge and menstrual changes in women who underwent: colposcopic examination only; cervical punch biopsies; and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).
DESIGN: Observational study nested within a randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Grampian, Tayside and Nottingham. POPULATION: Nine hundred-and-twenty-nine women, aged 20-59, with low-grade cytology, who had completed their initial colposcopic management.
METHODS: Women completed questionnaires on after-effects at approximately 6-weeks, and on menstruation at 4-months, post-colposcopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of pain, bleeding, discharge; changes to first menstrual period post-colposcopy.
RESULTS: Seven hundred-and-fifty-one women (80%) completed the 6-week questionnaire. Of women who had only a colposcopic examination, 14-18% reported pain, bleeding or discharge. Around half of women who had biopsies only and two-thirds treated by LLETZ reported pain or discharge (biopsies: 53% pain, 46% discharge; LLETZ: 67% pain, 63% discharge). The frequency of bleeding was similar in the biopsy (79%) and LLETZ groups (87%). Women treated by LLETZ reported bleeding and discharge of significantly longer duration than other women. The duration of pain was similar across management groups. Forty-three percent of women managed by biopsies and 71% managed by LLETZ reported some change to their first period post-colposcopy, as did 29% who only had a colposcopic examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical punch biopsies and, especially, LLETZ carry a substantial risk of after-effects. After-effects are also reported by women managed solely by colposcopic examination. Ensuring that women are fully informed about after-effects may help to alleviate anxiety and provide reassurance, thereby minimising the harms of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19583712     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  25 in total

1.  Physical after effects and clients satisfaction following colposcopy and cervical biopsy in a Nigerian population.

Authors:  C A Okonkwo; M C Ezeanochie; B N Olagbuji
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 2.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Sheila Weinmann; Marc Arbyn; Aruna Kamineni; Andrew E Williams; Inge M C M de Kok; Folkert van Kemenade; Terry S Field; Joost van Rosmalen; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Provider management of equivocal cervical cancer screening results among underserved women, 2009-2011: follow-up of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Meg Watson; Vicki Benard; Lavinia Lin; Tanner Rockwell; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Cervical Strip Biopsy for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions: a Valid Alternative to Conventional Punch Technique.

Authors:  A Schneider; K Wagner; C Rakozy; C Stolte; P Bothur-Schäfer; T Welcker; N Choly; A Roesgen; H Rothe; G Böhmer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

8.  Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

9.  Estimating HPV DNA Deposition Between Sexual Partners Using HPV Concordance, Y Chromosome DNA Detection, and Self-reported Sexual Behaviors.

Authors:  Talía Malagón; Ann N Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Julie Guénoun; Pierre-Paul Tellier; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: a cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial.

Authors:  Seonaidh Cotton; Linda Sharp; Claire Cochran; Nicola Gray; Maggie Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Julian Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.