Marvin Hamlin1, Terence Traughber1, David J Reinkensmeyer2, Ray D de Leon3. 1. School of Kinesiology and Nutritional Science, California State University, 5151 State University Dr, LA, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA. 2. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, 4200 Engineering Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697-3875, USA. 3. School of Kinesiology and Nutritional Science, California State University, 5151 State University Dr, LA, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA. Electronic address: rdeleon@calstatela.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Providing weight support facilitates locomotion in spinal cord injured animals. To control weight support, robotic systems have been developed for treadmill stepping and more recently for overground walking. NEW METHOD: We developed a novel device, the body weight supported ambulatory rodent trainer (i.e. BART). It has a small pneumatic cylinder that moves along a linear track above the rat. When air is supplied to the cylinder, the rats are lifted as they perform overground walking. We tested the BART device in rats that received a moderate spinal cord contusion injury and in normal rats. Locomotor training with the BART device was not performed. RESULTS: All of the rats learned to walk in the BART device. In the contused rats, significantly greater paw dragging and dorsal stepping occurred in the hindlimbs compared to normal. Providing weight support significantly raised hip position and significantly reduced locomotor deficits. Hindlimb stepping was tightly coupled to forelimb stepping but only when the contused rats stepped without weight support. Three weeks after the contused rats received a complete spinal cord transection, significantly fewer hindlimb steps were performed. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Relative to rodent robotic systems, the BART device is a simpler system for studying overground locomotion. The BART device lacks sophisticated control and sensing capability, but it can be assembled relatively easily and cheaply. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the BART device is a useful tool for assessing quadrupedal, overground locomotion which is a more natural form of locomotion relative to treadmill locomotion. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Providing weight support facilitates locomotion in spinal cord injured animals. To control weight support, robotic systems have been developed for treadmill stepping and more recently for overground walking. NEW METHOD: We developed a novel device, the body weight supported ambulatory rodent trainer (i.e. BART). It has a small pneumatic cylinder that moves along a linear track above the rat. When air is supplied to the cylinder, the rats are lifted as they perform overground walking. We tested the BART device in rats that received a moderate spinal cord contusion injury and in normal rats. Locomotor training with the BART device was not performed. RESULTS: All of the rats learned to walk in the BART device. In the contused rats, significantly greater paw dragging and dorsal stepping occurred in the hindlimbs compared to normal. Providing weight support significantly raised hip position and significantly reduced locomotor deficits. Hindlimb stepping was tightly coupled to forelimb stepping but only when the contused rats stepped without weight support. Three weeks after the contused rats received a complete spinal cord transection, significantly fewer hindlimb steps were performed. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Relative to rodent robotic systems, the BART device is a simpler system for studying overground locomotion. The BART device lacks sophisticated control and sensing capability, but it can be assembled relatively easily and cheaply. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the BART device is a useful tool for assessing quadrupedal, overground locomotion which is a more natural form of locomotion relative to treadmill locomotion. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Andy J Fong; Lance L Cai; Chad K Otoshi; David J Reinkensmeyer; Joel W Burdick; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-12-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jeff A Nessler; Ray D De Leon; Kelli Sharp; Eugene Kwak; Koyiro Minakata; David J Reinkensmeyer Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Wojciech K Timoszyk; Jeff A Nessler; Cynthia Acosta; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; David J Reinkensmeyer; Ray de Leon Journal: Brain Res Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Ray D de Leon; Marc D Kubasak; Patricia E Phelps; Wojciech K Timoszyk; David J Reinkensmeyer; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: Brain Res Brain Res Rev Date: 2002-10
Authors: Ray D de Leon; David J Reinkensmeyer; Wojciech K Timoszyk; Nicolas J London; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.453
Authors: Erika Hinahon; Christina Estrada; Lin Tong; Deborah S Won; Ray D de Leon Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.919