Literature DB >> 15979592

Hindlimb loading determines stepping quantity and quality following spinal cord transection.

Wojciech K Timoszyk1, Jeff A Nessler, Cynthia Acosta, Roland R Roy, V Reggie Edgerton, David J Reinkensmeyer, Ray de Leon.   

Abstract

We compared the bipedal hindlimb stepping ability of untrained and trained (step-trained 6 min/day) spinal rats (mid-thoracic spinal cord transection at post-natal day 5) at different levels of body weight support on a treadmill over a 40-day period, starting at 69 days of age. A robotic device provided precise levels of body weight support and recorded hindlimb movement. We assessed stepping ability using: (1) step quantity determined from the measured hindlimb movement, (2) ordinal scales of paw placement, weight-bearing, and limb flexion, and (3) the lowest level of body weight support at which stepping was maintained. Stepping quantity and quality depended strongly on the level of support provided. Stepping ability improved with time, but only at the higher levels of weight-bearing, and independently of training. Increasing limb loading by gradually decreasing body weight support altered the spatiotemporal properties of the steps, resulting in an increase in step length and stance duration and a decrease in swing and step cycle duration. The rats progressively improved their ability to support more load before collapsing from a maximum of about 42 g ( approximately 25% of body weight) at Day 1 to 73 g ( approximately 35% of body weight) at Day 40. We conclude that the level of hindlimb loading provided to a spinally transected rat strongly influences the quantity and quality of stepping. Furthermore, the relationship between stepping ability and loading conditions changes with time after spinal cord transection and is unaltered by small amounts of step training. Finally, load-bearing failure point can be a quantitative measure of locomotor recovery following spinal cord injury, especially for severely impaired animals that cannot step unassisted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979592     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  43 in total

1.  How spinalized rats can walk: biomechanics, cortex, and hindlimb muscle scaling--implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Greg Hockensmith; Arun Ramakrishnan; Ubong Ime Udoekwere
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  A systematic review of exercise training to promote locomotor recovery in animal models of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Camila R Battistuzzo; Robert J Callister; Robin Callister; Mary P Galea
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders.

Authors:  Nadia Dominici; Urs Keller; Heike Vallery; Lucia Friedli; Rubia van den Brand; Michelle L Starkey; Pavel Musienko; Robert Riener; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Motor primitives are determined in early development and are then robustly conserved into adulthood.

Authors:  Qi Yang; David Logan; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Strategy adoption and locomotor adjustment in obstacle clearance of newly walking toddlers with Down syndrome after different treadmill interventions.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Dale A Ulrich; Julia Looper; Chad W Tiernan; Rosa M Angulo-Barroso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor strategies used by rats spinalized at birth to maintain stance in response to imposed perturbations.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Michelle R Davies; Virginia Graziani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Increases in muscle activity produced by vibration of the thigh muscles during locomotion in chronic human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David Cotey; T George Hornby; Keith E Gordon; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face.

Authors:  Andy J Fong; Roland R Roy; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Igor Lavrov; Grégoire Courtine; Yury Gerasimenko; Y C Tai; Joel Burdick; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Role of spared pathways in locomotor recovery after body-weight-supported treadmill training in contused rats.

Authors:  Anita Singh; Sriram Balasubramanian; Marion Murray; Michel Lemay; John Houle
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.