Literature DB >> 25792494

Vertebroplasty increases trabecular microfractures in elderly female cadaver spines.

S Nagaraja1, H K Awada, M L Dreher.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study assessed whether vertebroplasty increases trabecular bone microfractures in adjacent vertebrae of elderly female cadavers. Results indicated microfractures were almost two times greater in superior adjacent vertebrae for vertebroplasty treated spines compared to non-treated controls. This finding may aid in developing improved treatments for osteoporotic women with vertebral fractures.
INTRODUCTION: Although vertebroplasty may stabilize compression fractures and reduce pain, subsequent vertebral fractures occur in approximately 25 % of patients, reducing the overall safety of this procedure. This is particularly a concern in vertebrae surrounding the treated level where bone cement may cause abnormal transfer of forces to adjacent spinal structures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify the effects of vertebroplasty on local trabecular bone damage in adjacent vertebrae.
METHODS: Five level motion segments (T11-L3) from osteopenic/osteoporotic female cadaver spines (T-score -2.9 ± 1.0) were assigned into either vertebroplasty or control (no vertebroplasty) groups (n = 10/group) such that T-score, trabecular microarchitecture, and age were similar between groups. Compression fractures were created in the L 1 vertebra of all specimens and PMMA bone cement was injected into the fractured vertebra of vertebroplasty specimens. All spine segments were subjected to cyclic axial compression (685-1370 N) for 115,000 cycles. Post-testing, trabecular cubes were cut from adjacent (T12 and L2) vertebral bodies and histologically processed. Trabecular microfractures were identified and normalized by bone area in each section.
RESULTS: There were significantly more trabecular microfractures (p < 0.001) in superior adjacent vertebral bodies of the vertebroplasty group (0.091 ± 0.025 microfractures/mm(2)) when compared to the control group (0.049 ± 0.018 microfractures/mm(2)). However, there was no difference in trabecular microfractures (p = 0.835) between vertebroplasty (0.045 ± 0.022 microfractures/mm(2)) and control groups (0.035 ± 0.013 microfractures/mm(2)) for inferior adjacent vertebral bodies.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertebroplasty specifically impacts the superior adjacent vertebrae of elderly female spines resulting in almost two times more trabecular microfractures when compared to non-treated controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25792494     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3105-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Spatial correlations of trabecular bone microdamage with local stresses and strains using rigid image registration.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Oskar Skrinjar; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Mechanism of fractures of adjacent and augmented vertebrae following simulated vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Jaw-Lin Wang; Chun-Kai Chiang; Ya-Wen Kuo; Wen-Kai Chou; Been-Der Yang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Compressive loads in the lumbar vertebral column during normal level walking.

Authors:  A Cappozzo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Vertebroplasty increases compression of adjacent IVDs and vertebrae in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Hassan K Awada; Maureen L Dreher; Shikha Gupta; Scott W Miller
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Vertebral endplate fractures: an indicator of the abnormal forces generated in the spine after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; David F Kallmes; Kennith F Layton; Kent R Thielen; Joseph G Hentz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Incidence and risk factors for vertebral fracture in women and men: 25-year follow-up results from the population-based Framingham study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Yuqing Zhang; Harry K Genant; David T Felson; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Long-term prospective study of osteoporotic patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty after fragility fractures.

Authors:  M Mazzantini; P Carpeggiani; A d'Ascanio; S Bombardieri; O Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Cancellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur: influence of age and osteoarthritis on damage morphology and regional distribution.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; J S Kuliwaba; M R Forwood
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sean Molloy; John M Mathis; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Elastoplasty as a promising novel technique: Vertebral augmentation with an elastic silicone-based polymer.

Authors:  Alessandro Gasbarrini; Riccardo Ghermandi; Yunus Emre Akman; Marco Girolami; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.511

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.