BACKGROUND: The natural history of premature ventricular complex (PVC)-induced cardiomyopathy is incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess long term follow-up data in patients who underwent successful PVC ablation for PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 60 patients (17 women; mean age 52.5 ± 16.8 years; ejection fraction [EF] 37.3 ± 8.5%, median 40%, interquartile range [IQR] 15) with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy who underwent successful ablation of their predominant PVCs between 2005 and 2012. Patients were followed up for a mean of 23.6 ± 17.2 months. EF improved to 57.2 ± 4.7% (median 55%, IQR 5; P = .0001) within 9.6 ± 8.4 months of the ablation procedure. During follow-up, 10 of 60 patients (16.7%) had recurrent frequent PVCs and 50 patients (83.3%) did not. Patients underwent repeat assessment of EF and PVC burden. RESULTS: During follow-up of 23.6 ± 17.2 months, 10 patients had recurrent frequent PVCs, with an increase of their PVC burden from 1.4 ± 0.9% (median 1.05%, IQR 1.59) after the initial ablation to 27.2 ± 8.8% (median 26.0%, IQR 18.2; P = .018). Their EF decreased from 55.7 ± 3.4% (median 55%, IQR 5.8) after the initial ablation to 40.2 ± 5.1% (median 40%, IQR 15; P = .005). In the remaining patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, EF and PVC burden remained unchanged during follow-up. Patients with PVC recurrence had a higher number of pleomorphic PVC morphologies during initial presentation (4.7 ± 2.2 vs 2.5 ± 2.8, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Recurrence of frequent PVCs in patients with a history of PVC cardiomyopathy can result in recurrence of cardiomyopathy. Follow-up in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy is important, especially if patients were asymptomatic from the PVCs and have pleomorphic PVCs.
BACKGROUND: The natural history of premature ventricular complex (PVC)-induced cardiomyopathy is incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess long term follow-up data in patients who underwent successful PVC ablation for PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 60 patients (17 women; mean age 52.5 ± 16.8 years; ejection fraction [EF] 37.3 ± 8.5%, median 40%, interquartile range [IQR] 15) with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy who underwent successful ablation of their predominant PVCs between 2005 and 2012. Patients were followed up for a mean of 23.6 ± 17.2 months. EF improved to 57.2 ± 4.7% (median 55%, IQR 5; P = .0001) within 9.6 ± 8.4 months of the ablation procedure. During follow-up, 10 of 60 patients (16.7%) had recurrent frequent PVCs and 50 patients (83.3%) did not. Patients underwent repeat assessment of EF and PVC burden. RESULTS: During follow-up of 23.6 ± 17.2 months, 10 patients had recurrent frequent PVCs, with an increase of their PVC burden from 1.4 ± 0.9% (median 1.05%, IQR 1.59) after the initial ablation to 27.2 ± 8.8% (median 26.0%, IQR 18.2; P = .018). Their EF decreased from 55.7 ± 3.4% (median 55%, IQR 5.8) after the initial ablation to 40.2 ± 5.1% (median 40%, IQR 15; P = .005). In the remaining patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, EF and PVC burden remained unchanged during follow-up. Patients with PVC recurrence had a higher number of pleomorphic PVC morphologies during initial presentation (4.7 ± 2.2 vs 2.5 ± 2.8, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Recurrence of frequent PVCs in patients with a history of PVC cardiomyopathy can result in recurrence of cardiomyopathy. Follow-up in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy is important, especially if patients were asymptomatic from the PVCs and have pleomorphic PVCs.
Authors: Francisco Contijoch; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; James J Pilla; Paul Yushkevich; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Harold Litt; Yuchi Han; Walter R T Witschey Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bulent Gorenek; John D Fisher; Gulmira Kudaiberdieva; Adrian Baranchuk; Haran Burri; Kristen Bova Campbell; Mina K Chung; Andrés Enriquez; Hein Heidbuchel; Valentina Kutyifa; Kousik Krishnan; Christophe Leclercq; Emin Evren Ozcan; Kristen K Patton; Win Shen; James E Tisdale; Mohit K Turagam; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Bernas Altıntaş; Flora Özkalaycı; Göksel Çinier; İlyas Kaya; Adem Aktan; Ayhan Küp; Raşit Onuk; Sevgi Özcan; Abdulkadir Uslu; Abdurrahman Akyüz; Adem Atıcı; Selim Ekinci; Halil Akın; Mehmet Fatih Yılmaz; Şahbender Koç; Veysel Ozan Tanık; Hazar Harbalıoğlu; Hasan Ali Barman; Abdülmecit Afşin; Ayça Gümüşdağ; Hayrudin Alibaşiç; Yavuz Karabağ; Murat Cap; Erkan Baysal; İbrahim Halil Tanboğa Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2019-09-22 Impact factor: 1.468