Literature DB >> 25791447

CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.

Christophe Nich1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25791447      PMCID： PMC4586238          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-015-4261-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

2.  Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  Alison J Smith; Paul Dieppe; Peter W Howard; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Outcomes after revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen Pykerman; Jason Werle; Diane Lorenzetti; Tracy Wasylak; Tom Noseworthy; Donald A Dick; Greg O'Connor; Aish Sundaram; Sanne Heintzbergen; Cy Frank
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007.

Authors:  Per-Erik Johanson; Anne Marie Fenstad; Ove Furnes; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Sören Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.