Judy K Qiang1, Connie Marras2. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada. Electronic address: j.qiang@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Research, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst St., Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada. Electronic address: connie.marras@uhnresearch.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To overcome travel distance and lack of local expertise, telemedicine programs have been implemented and are still pilot programs in many jurisdictions. Patient perspectives remain poorly understood. In the largest study to date, we examined user satisfaction and predictors of patient choice to use telemedicine among Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients in the context of a well-developed telemedicine system. These data can help to optimize healthcare delivery by telemedicine. METHODS: A patient satisfaction questionnaire was administered to current or previous users via telephone. Patients' cost savings were determined. The proportion of non-users interested in using telemedicine was quantified. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those who expressed interest in the program vs. those who did not were compared. RESULTS: A total of 34 users and 103 non-users were recruited. Users reported an average cost reduction of $200 and 209 minutes of reduction in commute time (p < 0.01). While a majority (29/34 users) reported interest in continuing with telemedicine, inexperience of some telehealth nurses was a major source of patient dissatisfaction. Patients preferred a combination of telehealth and in-person visits. A majority of non-users (55/103, 53%) declared interest in telemedicine, but it had not been offered to them. A lower Hoehn and Yahr stage and a longer commute time were associated with patient interest in telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Training of nurses is an important determinant of patient satisfaction. Clinicians should consider offering telehealth to all patients for whom it is medically appropriate, especially those who experience long travel times.
INTRODUCTION: To overcome travel distance and lack of local expertise, telemedicine programs have been implemented and are still pilot programs in many jurisdictions. Patient perspectives remain poorly understood. In the largest study to date, we examined user satisfaction and predictors of patient choice to use telemedicine among Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients in the context of a well-developed telemedicine system. These data can help to optimize healthcare delivery by telemedicine. METHODS: A patient satisfaction questionnaire was administered to current or previous users via telephone. Patients' cost savings were determined. The proportion of non-users interested in using telemedicine was quantified. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those who expressed interest in the program vs. those who did not were compared. RESULTS: A total of 34 users and 103 non-users were recruited. Users reported an average cost reduction of $200 and 209 minutes of reduction in commute time (p < 0.01). While a majority (29/34 users) reported interest in continuing with telemedicine, inexperience of some telehealth nurses was a major source of patient dissatisfaction. Patients preferred a combination of telehealth and in-person visits. A majority of non-users (55/103, 53%) declared interest in telemedicine, but it had not been offered to them. A lower Hoehn and Yahr stage and a longer commute time were associated with patient interest in telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Training of nurses is an important determinant of patient satisfaction. Clinicians should consider offering telehealth to all patients for whom it is medically appropriate, especially those who experience long travel times.
Authors: H Ben-Pazi; P Browne; P Chan; E Cubo; M Guttman; A Hassan; J Hatcher-Martin; Z Mari; E Moukheiber; N U Okubadejo; A Shalash Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Ryan E Korn; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Maya Katz; H Tait Keenan; Steven Goldenthal; Peggy Auinger; William Zhu; Michael Dodge; Kyle Rizer; Meredith A Achey; Erica Byrd; Richard Barbano; Irene Richard; Kelly L Andrzejewski; Heidi B Schwarz; E Ray Dorsey; Kevin M Biglan; Gail Kang; Sulada Kanchana; Ramon Rodriguez; Caroline M Tanner; Nicholas B Galifianakis Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2017-08
Authors: E Ray Dorsey; Floris P Vlaanderen; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Karl Kieburtz; William Zhu; Kevin M Biglan; Marjan J Faber; Bastiaan R Bloem Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Susannah Rose; Heather McKee Hurwitz; Mary Beth Mercer; Sabahat Hizlan; Kari Gali; Pei-Chun Yu; Caroline Franke; Kathryn Martinez; Matthew Stanton; Peter Rasmussen; Adrienne Boissy; Matthew Faiman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 5.428