PURPOSE: Both low levels of vitamin D and of physical activity are associated with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. There is some evidence based on self-reported activity levels that physically more active individuals have higher vitamin D serum levels. The aim was to investigate associations between objectively measured and self-reported physical activity, respectively, and vitamin D serum concentrations in the US population. METHODS: Data from NHANES 2003-2006 (n = 6,370, aged ≥ 18 years) were analyzed using multiple regression analyses. A total of 6,370 individuals aged 18 years and older with valid data on vitamin D serum levels and physical activity were included. Objective physical activity was assessed using accelerometers; self-reported physical activity was based on the NHANES physical activity questionnaire. RESULTS: An increase of 10 min of objectively measured and self-reported moderate-to-vigorous activities per day was associated with an increase in circulating vitamin D of 0.32 ng/ml (95% CI 0.17, 0.48) and of 0.18 ng/ml (95% CI 0.12, 0.23), respectively. The odds ratio for being vitamin D deficient (< 20 ng/ml) if being insufficiently active compared with being sufficiently active was 1.32 (1.11, 1.57). Associations were not stronger for self-reported outdoor activities compared with indoor activities. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity may be a way to achieve higher vitamin D serum levels in the population. Factors other than sun exposure that may be responsible for higher vitamin D levels in more active individuals need further investigation.
PURPOSE: Both low levels of vitamin D and of physical activity are associated with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. There is some evidence based on self-reported activity levels that physically more active individuals have higher vitamin D serum levels. The aim was to investigate associations between objectively measured and self-reported physical activity, respectively, and vitamin D serum concentrations in the US population. METHODS: Data from NHANES 2003-2006 (n = 6,370, aged ≥ 18 years) were analyzed using multiple regression analyses. A total of 6,370 individuals aged 18 years and older with valid data on vitamin D serum levels and physical activity were included. Objective physical activity was assessed using accelerometers; self-reported physical activity was based on the NHANES physical activity questionnaire. RESULTS: An increase of 10 min of objectively measured and self-reported moderate-to-vigorous activities per day was associated with an increase in circulating vitamin D of 0.32 ng/ml (95% CI 0.17, 0.48) and of 0.18 ng/ml (95% CI 0.12, 0.23), respectively. The odds ratio for being vitamin D deficient (< 20 ng/ml) if being insufficiently active compared with being sufficiently active was 1.32 (1.11, 1.57). Associations were not stronger for self-reported outdoor activities compared with indoor activities. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity may be a way to achieve higher vitamin D serum levels in the population. Factors other than sun exposure that may be responsible for higher vitamin D levels in more active individuals need further investigation.
Authors: Stephanie Skender; Jürgen Böhm; Petra Schrotz-King; Jenny Chang-Claude; Erin M Siegel; Karen Steindorf; Robert W Owen; Jennifer Ose; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Akiko Chiba; Rachna Raman; Alexandra Thomas; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Marie Viala; Stephane Pouderoux; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Simon Thezenas; William Jacot Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Yannis Manios; George Moschonis; Christina P Lambrinou; Christina Mavrogianni; Lydia Tsirigoti; Ulrich Hoeller; Franz F Roos; Igor Bendik; Manfred Eggersdorfer; Carlos Celis-Morales; Katherine M Livingstone; Cyril F M Marsaux; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Clare B O'Donovan; Clara Woolhead; Hannah Forster; Marianne C Walsh; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Silvia Kolossa; Jacqueline Hallmann; Mirosław Jarosz; Agnieszka Surwiłło; Iwona Traczyk; Christian A Drevon; Ben van Ommen; Keith Grimaldi; John N S Matthews; Hannelore Daniel; J Alfredo Martinez; Julie A Lovegrove; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Wim H M Saris; Mike Gibney; John C Mathers Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Elizabeth A Hibler; Christine L Sardo Molmenti; Qi Dai; Lindsay N Kohler; Shaneda Warren Anderson; Peter W Jurutka; Elizabeth T Jacobs Journal: Bone Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Brandon S Klinedinst; Nathan F Meier; Brittany Larsen; Yueying Wang; Shan Yu; Jonathan P Mochel; Scott Le; Tovah Wolf; Amy Pollpeter; Colleen Pappas; Qian Wang; Karin Allenspach; Li Wang; Daniel Russell; David A Bennett; Auriel A Willette Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Kathleen Chin; Di Zhao; Martin Tibuakuu; Seth S Martin; Chiadi E Ndumele; Roberta Florido; B Gwen Windham; Eliseo Guallar; Pamela L Lutsey; Erin D Michos Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Loreen Straub; Johanna Riedel; Peter B Luppa; Johanna Wissing; Almut Artmann; Marion Kiechle; Vanadin Regina Seifert-Klauss Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: J Woo; M D Koenig; C G Engeland; M A Kominiarek; R White-Traut; P Yeatts; C Giurgescu Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 4.292