| Literature DB >> 25790798 |
Kimberly C Blom1, Sasha Farina, Yessica-Haydee Gomez, Norm R C Campbell, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, Lyne Cloutier, Donald W McKay, Martin Dawes, Sheldon W Tobe, Peter Bolli, Mark Gelfer, Donna McLean, Gillian Bartlett, Lawrence Joseph, Robin Featherstone, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Stella S Daskalopoulou.
Abstract
Despite progress in automated blood pressure measurement (BPM) technology, there is limited research linking hard outcomes to automated office BPM (OBPM) treatment targets and thresholds. Equivalences for automated BPM devices have been estimated from approximations of standardized manual measurements of 140/90 mmHg. Until outcome-driven targets and thresholds become available for automated measurement methods, deriving evidence-based equivalences between automated methods and standardized manual OBPM is the next best solution. The MeasureBP study group was initiated by the Canadian Hypertension Education Program to close this critical knowledge gap. MeasureBP aims to define evidence-based equivalent values between standardized manual OBPM and automated BPM methods by synthesizing available evidence using a systematic review and individual subject-level data meta-analyses. This manuscript provides a review of the literature and MeasureBP study protocol. These results will lay the evidenced-based foundation to resolve uncertainties within blood pressure guidelines which, in turn, will improve the management of hypertension.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25790798 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-015-0533-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep ISSN: 1522-6417 Impact factor: 5.369