Christine Walrath1, Lucas Godoy Garraza, Hailey Reid, David B Goldston, Richard McKeon. 1. Christine Walrath, Lucas Godoy Garraza, and Hailey Reid are with the Public Health Division, ICF International, New York, NY. David B. Goldston is with the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Richard McKeon is with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether a reduction in youth suicide mortality occurred between 2007 and 2010 that could reasonably be attributed to Garrett Lee Smith (GLS) program efforts. METHODS: We compared youth mortality rates across time between counties that implemented GLS-funded gatekeeper training sessions (the most frequently implemented suicide prevention strategy among grantees) and a set of matched counties in which no GLS-funded training occurred. A rich set of background characteristics, including preintervention mortality rates, was accounted for with a combination of propensity score-based techniques. We also analyzed closely related outcomes that we did not expect to be affected by GLS as control outcomes. RESULTS: Counties implementing GLS training had significantly lower suicide rates among the population aged 10 to 24 years the year after GLS training than similar counties that did not implement GLS training (1.33 fewer deaths per 100 000; P = .02). Simultaneously, we found no significant difference in terms of adult suicide mortality rates or nonsuicide youth mortality the year after the implementation. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the existence of an important reduction in youth suicide rates resulting from the implementation of GLS suicide prevention programming.
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether a reduction in youth suicide mortality occurred between 2007 and 2010 that could reasonably be attributed to Garrett Lee Smith (GLS) program efforts. METHODS: We compared youth mortality rates across time between counties that implemented GLS-funded gatekeeper training sessions (the most frequently implemented suicide prevention strategy among grantees) and a set of matched counties in which no GLS-funded training occurred. A rich set of background characteristics, including preintervention mortality rates, was accounted for with a combination of propensity score-based techniques. We also analyzed closely related outcomes that we did not expect to be affected by GLS as control outcomes. RESULTS: Counties implementing GLS training had significantly lower suicide rates among the population aged 10 to 24 years the year after GLS training than similar counties that did not implement GLS training (1.33 fewer deaths per 100 000; P = .02). Simultaneously, we found no significant difference in terms of adult suicide mortality rates or nonsuicide youth mortality the year after the implementation. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the existence of an important reduction in youth suicide rates resulting from the implementation of GLS suicide prevention programming.
Authors: Kerry L Knox; Steven Pflanz; Gerald W Talcott; Rick L Campise; Jill E Lavigne; Alina Bajorska; Xin Tu; Eric D Caine Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David B Goldston; Christine M Walrath; Richard McKeon; Richard W Puddy; Keri M Lubell; Lloyd B Potter; Michael S Rodi Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2010-06
Authors: Donna Susanne Condron; Lucas Godoy Garraza; Christine M Walrath; Richard McKeon; David B Goldston; Nicole S Heilbron Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2014-12-02
Authors: Mary F Cwik; Lauren Tingey; Alexandra Maschino; Novalene Goklish; Francene Larzelere-Hinton; John Walkup; Allison Barlow Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 9.308