Literature DB >> 2578947

Clinical relevance of long-latency SEPs and VEPs during coma and emergence from coma.

G Pfurtscheller, G Schwarz, N Gravenstein.   

Abstract

Follow-up measurements of long-latency visual (VEP) and somatosensory (SEP) evoked potentials were performed on 30 comatose patients. Twenty-seven of the patients had severe head injury, 2 had encephalitis and 1 was in a posthypoxic state. For the SEP study a mechanical vibration stimulus was used, applied 60 times at intervals of 10 sec. The same rate was used for visual stimulation. The late EP components were classified by a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), whereby an SNR of less than 2.6 is characteristic of a questionable or unmeasurable EP and an SNR greater than 2.6 is evidence of a clearly existing EP; the clinical state was scored using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); the patient outcome was assessed 6 months after the injury using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The highest correlation (r = 0.72) was found between the clinical state, represented by the GCS, and the SEP. A similar correlation (r = 0.66) was obtained between the GCS and the vertex VEP. The occipital VEP showed no correlation. Emergence from coma and recovery was accompanied by an increase of the SEP and an increasing spread of the VEP over the whole scalp. Most patients with a clear long-latency SEP in coma had a favourable outcome; a missing or a questionable SEP indicated a poor outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2578947     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90020-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

Review 1.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Evoked potentials in severe herpes simplex encephalitis.

Authors:  G Grimm; C Madl; W Oder; W Druml; B Schneeweiss; A N Laggner; H D Gössinger; K Geissler; K Lenz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Brain function in patients with cerebral fat embolism evaluated using somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Morioka; H Yagi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Some comments on the clinical use of evoked potentials.

Authors:  S L Notermans; E J Colon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1986

Review 5.  Multimodality evoked potentials and early prognosis in comatose patients.

Authors:  R Firsching; R A Frowein
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Event-related potentials--neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma.

Authors:  N M Kane; S H Curry; C A Rowlands; A R Manara; T Lewis; T Moss; B H Cummins; S R Butler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Pyramidal tract lesions in comatose patients.

Authors:  R Firsching; S Wilhelms; R D Hilgers
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Brain death and bioelectrical brain activity.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; G Schwarz; W List
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention.

Authors:  Stephen Whitmarsh; Christophe Gitton; Veikko Jousmäki; Jérôme Sackur; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.