| Literature DB >> 25789085 |
Satoshi Ogiso1, Etsuro Hatano1, Takeo Nomi1, Shinji Uemoto1.
Abstract
In the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis, it is important to preserve sufficient liver volume after resection in order to avoid post-hepatectomy liver sufficiency and to increase the feasibility of repeated hepatectomy in case of intrahepatic recurrence. Parenchyma-sparing approach, which minimizes the extent of resection while obtaining sufficient surgical margins, has been developed in open hepatectomy. Although this approach can possibly have positive impacts on morbidity and mortality, it is not popular in laparoscopic approach because parenchyma-sparing resection is technically demanding especially by laparoscopy due to its intricate curved transection planes. "Small incision, big resection" is the words to caution laparoscopic surgeons against an easygoing trend to seek for a superficial minimal-invasiveness rather than substantial patient-benefits. Minimal parenchyma excision is often more important than minimal incision. Recently, several reports have shown that technical evolution and accumulation of experience allow surgeons to overcome the hurdle in laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of difficult-to-access liver lesions in posterosuperior segments, paracaval portion, and central liver. Laparoscopic surgeons should now seek for the possibility of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy as open approach can, which we believe is beneficial for patients rather than just a small incision and lead laparoscopic hepatectomy toward a truly minimally-invasive approach.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal carcinoma; Hepatectomy; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Laparoscopic surgery; Laparoscopy; Liver lesion; Liver metastasis; Liver resection; Minimally-invasive; Parenchyma-sparing
Year: 2015 PMID: 25789085 PMCID: PMC4360433 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc