Literature DB >> 25788593

Repeatability of adaptation in experimental populations of different sizes.

Josianne Lachapelle1, Joshua Reid2, Nick Colegrave2.   

Abstract

The degree to which evolutionary trajectories and outcomes are repeatable across independent populations depends on the relative contribution of selection, chance and history. Population size has been shown theoretically and empirically to affect the amount of variation that arises among independent populations adapting to the same environment. Here, we measure the contribution of selection, chance and history in different-sized experimental populations of the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii adapting to a high salt environment to determine which component of evolution is affected by population size. We find that adaptation to salt is repeatable at the fitness level in medium (Ne = 5 × 10(4)) and large (Ne = 4 × 10(5)) populations because of the large contribution of selection. Adaptation is not repeatable in small (Ne = 5 × 10(3)) populations because of large constraints from history. The threshold between stochastic and deterministic evolution in this case is therefore between effective population sizes of 10(3) and 10(4). Our results indicate that diversity across populations is more likely to be maintained if they are small. Experimental outcomes in large populations are likely to be robust and can inform our predictions about outcomes in similar situations.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; adaptation; experimental evolution; historical contingency; repeatability; stochasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25788593      PMCID: PMC4389614          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.3033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  47 in total

1.  Sex releases the speed limit on evolution.

Authors:  Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations.

Authors:  Daniel E Rozen; J Arjan G M de Visser; Philip J Gerrish
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Long-term dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Michael J Wiser; Noah Ribeck; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Way Sung; Matthew S Ackerman; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Predictability of evolution depends nonmonotonically on population size.

Authors:  Ivan G Szendro; Jasper Franke; J Arjan G M de Visser; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Experimental evolution of heterotrophy in a green alga.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys.

Authors:  Daniel B Weissman; Michael M Desai; Daniel S Fisher; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Laboratory selection quickly erases historical differentiation.

Authors:  Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Margarida Lima; Bárbara Kellen; Margarida Bárbaro; Josiane Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Population size mediates the contribution of high-rate and large-benefit mutations to parallel evolution.

Authors:  Martijn F Schenk; Mark P Zwart; Sungmin Hwang; Philip Ruelens; Edouard Severing; Joachim Krug; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Effects of Transmission Bottlenecks on the Diversity of Influenza A Virus.

Authors:  Daniel Sigal; Jennifer N S Reid; Lindi M Wahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms.

Authors:  Thomas LaBar; Christoph Adami
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Predictable phenotypic, but not karyotypic, evolution of populations with contrasting initial history.

Authors:  Pedro Simões; Inês Fragata; Sofia G Seabra; Gonçalo S Faria; Marta A Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Approaches to Macroevolution: 1. General Concepts and Origin of Variation.

Authors:  David Jablonski
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  The Effect of Population Bottleneck Size and Selective Regime on Genetic Diversity and Evolvability in Bacteria.

Authors:  Tanita Wein; Tal Dagan
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  The impact of propagule pressure on whole community invasions in biomethane-producing communities.

Authors:  Pawel Sierocinski; Jesica Soria Pascual; Daniel Padfield; Mike Salter; Angus Buckling
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-05-28

8.  Divergent evolution peaks under intermediate population bottlenecks during bacterial experimental evolution.

Authors:  Tom Vogwill; Robyn L Phillips; Danna R Gifford; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Fitness change in relation to mutation number in spontaneous mutation accumulation lines of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Susanne A Kraemer; Katharina B Böndel; Robert W Ness; Peter D Keightley; Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Effect of Population Size and Mutation Rate on the Evolution of RNA Sequences on an Adaptive Landscape Determined by RNA Folding.

Authors:  Ali R Vahdati; Kathleen Sprouffske; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.