Literature DB >> 25788493

Identification of a Candidate Gene Panel for the Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Gisele H J M Leyten1, Daphne Hessels2, Frank P Smit2, Sander A Jannink2, Hans de Jong2, Willem J G Melchers3, Erik B Cornel4, Theo M de Reijke5, Henk Vergunst6, Paul Kil7, Ben C Knipscheer8, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa9, Peter F A Mulders1, Inge M van Oort1, Jack A Schalken10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Serum PSA (sPSA) testing has led to the identification of patients with indolent prostate cancer, and inevitably overtreatment has become a concern. Progensa PCA3 urine testing was shown to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but its diagnostic value for aggressive prostate cancer is limited. Therefore, urinary biomarkers that can be used for prediction of Gleason score ≥7 prostate cancer in biopsies are urgently needed. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Using gene expression profiling data, 39 prostate cancer biomarkers were identified. After quantitative PCR analysis on tissue specimens and urinary sediments, eight promising biomarkers for the urinary detection of prostate cancer were selected (ONECUT2, HOXC4, HOXC6, DLX1, TDRD1, NKAIN1, MS4A8B, PPFIA2). The hypothesis that biomarker combinations improve the diagnostic value for aggressive prostate cancer was tested on 358 urinary sediments of an intention-to-treat cohort.
RESULTS: A urinary three-gene panel (HOXC6, TDRD1, and DLX1) had higher accuracy [area under the curve (AUC), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.83] to predict Gleason score ≥7 prostate cancer in biopsies compared with Progensa PCA3 (AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.75) or sPSA (AUC, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.78). Combining the three-gene panel with sPSA further improved the predictive accuracy (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86). The accuracy of the three-gene predictive model was maintained in subgroups with low sPSA concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The urinary three-gene panel (HOXC6, TDRD1, and DLX1) represents a promising tool to identify patients with aggressive prostate cancer, also in those with low sPSA values. The combination of the urinary three-gene panel with sPSA bears great potential for the early diagnosis of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25788493     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  70 in total

Review 1.  Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective.

Authors:  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23

2.  Differentiating Molecular Risk Assessments for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Press; Michael Schulster; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

3.  Prostate cancer: New gene panel for aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Kelsey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Temporal Stability and Prognostic Biomarker Potential of the Prostate Cancer Urine miRNA Transcriptome.

Authors:  Jouhyun Jeon; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Honglei Xie; Cindy Q Yao; Fang Zhao; Sahar Jahangiri; Carmelle Cuizon; Seville Scarcello; Renu Jeyapala; John D Watson; Michael Fraser; Jessica Ray; Kristina Commisso; Andrew Loblaw; Neil E Fleshner; Robert G Bristow; Michelle Downes; Danny Vesprini; Stanley Liu; Bharati Bapat; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The context of prostate cancer genomics in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Yanling Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Multiparametric MRI Versus SelectMDx Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant PCa in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Giuseppe Dibenedetto; Ludovica Pepe; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  The Use of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment.

Authors:  Ashley V Alford; Joseph M Brito; Kamlesh K Yadav; Shalini S Yadav; Ashutosh K Tewari; Joseph Renzulli
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Improving the Specificity of PSA Screening with Serum and Urine Markers.

Authors:  James T Kearns; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  How should radiologists incorporate non-imaging prostate cancer biomarkers into daily practice?

Authors:  Pawel Rajwa; Jamil Syed; Michael S Leapman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

10.  Chemotherapy-Induced Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs Promote Breast Cancer Stemness by Targeting ONECUT2.

Authors:  Meng Shen; Chuan Dong; Xianhui Ruan; Wei Yan; Minghui Cao; Donald Pizzo; Xiwei Wu; Lin Yang; Liang Liu; Xiubao Ren; Shizhen Emily Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.