Ian P Clements1, Ernest V Garcia2, Ji Chen2, Russell D Folks3, Javed Butler2, Arnold F Jacobson4. 1. Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MA, USA. clements.ian@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road, NE, Room E163, Atlanta, USA. 3. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, USA. 4. GE Health Care, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate new approaches to quantitative MIBG myocardial SPECT imaging in heart failure (HF) subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Quantitative MIBG myocardial SPECT analysis methods, alone and in conjunction with 99mTc-tetrofosmin perfusion SPECT, were adapted from previously validated techniques for the analysis of SPECT and PET perfusion imaging. To account for underestimation of MIBG defect severity in subjects with global reduction in uptake, a mixed reference database based on planar heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio categories was used. Extent and severity of voxel-based defects and number of myocardial segments with significant dysinnervation (derived score ≥2) were determined. MIBG/99mTc-tetrofosmin mismatch was quantified using regions with preserved innervation as the reference for scaling 99mTc-tetrofosmin voxel maps. Quantification techniques were tested on studies of 619 ischemic (I) and 319 non-ischemic (NI) HF subjects. Using all analytical techniques, IHF subjects had significantly greater and more severe MIBG SPECT abnormalities compared with NIHF subjects. Innervation/perfusion mismatches were also larger in IHF subjects. Findings were consistent between voxel- and myocardial-segment-based quantitation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple objective methods for quantitation of MIBG SPECT imaging studies provided internally consistent results for distinguishing the different patterns of uptake between IHF and NIHF subjects.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate new approaches to quantitative MIBG myocardial SPECT imaging in heart failure (HF) subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Quantitative MIBG myocardial SPECT analysis methods, alone and in conjunction with 99mTc-tetrofosmin perfusion SPECT, were adapted from previously validated techniques for the analysis of SPECT and PET perfusion imaging. To account for underestimation of MIBG defect severity in subjects with global reduction in uptake, a mixed reference database based on planar heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio categories was used. Extent and severity of voxel-based defects and number of myocardial segments with significant dysinnervation (derived score ≥2) were determined. MIBG/99mTc-tetrofosmin mismatch was quantified using regions with preserved innervation as the reference for scaling 99mTc-tetrofosmin voxel maps. Quantification techniques were tested on studies of 619 ischemic (I) and 319 non-ischemic (NI) HF subjects. Using all analytical techniques, IHF subjects had significantly greater and more severe MIBG SPECT abnormalities compared with NIHF subjects. Innervation/perfusion mismatches were also larger in IHF subjects. Findings were consistent between voxel- and myocardial-segment-based quantitation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple objective methods for quantitation of MIBG SPECT imaging studies provided internally consistent results for distinguishing the different patterns of uptake between IHF and NIHF subjects.
Authors: C Zhao; N Shuke; W Yamamoto; A Okizaki; J Sato; Y Ishikawa; T Ohta; N Hasebe; K Kikuchi; T Aburano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: P Merlet; C Benvenuti; D Moyse; F Pouillart; J L Dubois-Randé; A M Duval; D Loisance; A Castaigne; A Syrota Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Rishi Arora; Kevin J Ferrick; Tomoaki Nakata; Robert C Kaplan; Michael Rozengarten; Farhana Latif; Kaman Ng; Vanessa Marcano; Sherman Heller; John D Fisher; Mark I Travin Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Anna Teresińska; Olgierd Woźniak; Aleksander Maciąg; Jacek Wnuk; Jarosław Jezierski; Aneta Fronczak; Elżbieta Katarzyna Biernacka Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2021-05-23 Impact factor: 2.668