Literature DB >> 2578772

Denver developmental screening test and preterm infants.

A M Elliman, E M Bryan, A D Elliman, P Palmer, L Dubowitz.   

Abstract

The results of Denver developmental screening test and Griffiths mental development scales examination performed on 198 preterm children during the first three years of life and compared. Using real age the former identified children with developmental delay, but labelled up to 42% of babies as having questionable or abnormal development. Using corrected age very few children showed less than normal development, and in the first year those whose Griffiths scales results showed delay were often assessed as normal by the Denver test. In view of its less satisfactory sensitivity and selectivity it is suggested that both age lines should be drawn when using the Denver test with preterm children so that undue anxiety can be allayed while appropriate action is taken to ensure adequate follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2578772      PMCID: PMC1777069          DOI: 10.1136/adc.60.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  9 in total

1.  The Denver Developmental Screening Test. Achievement of test items in the first year of life by Denver and Cardiff infants.

Authors:  G M Bryant; K J Davies; R G Newcombe
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  The revised Denver Developmental Screening Test: its accuracy as a screening instrument.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; A D Goldstein; B W Camp
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  The effects of early stimulation on low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  S Scarr-Salapatek; M L Williams
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1973-03

4.  Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant.

Authors:  L M Dubowitz; V Dubowitz; C Goldberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Neurological and neurobehavioural differences between preterm infants at term and full-term newborn infants.

Authors:  P G Palmer; L M Dubowitz; M Verghote; V Dubowitz
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.947

6.  The Denver developmental screening test.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J B Dodds
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Complementing the success of medical intervention.

Authors:  S L Friedman; S F Chipman; J W Segal; R R Cocking
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Follow-up of pre-term infants: is correction of the developmental quotient for prematurity helpful?

Authors:  G Miller; L M Dubowitz; P Palmer
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Developmental and neurological progress of preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage and ventricular dilatation.

Authors:  P Palmer; L M Dubowitz; M I Levene; V Dubowitz
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.791

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Is late walking a marker of morbidity? Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; O Goddard; H Ashurst
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Feasibility and Added Value of Fetal DTI Tractography in the Evaluation of an Isolated Short Corpus Callosum: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  A-E Millischer; D Grevent; P Sonigo; N Bahi-Buisson; I Desguerre; H Mahallati; J-P Bault; T Quibel; S Couderc; M-L Moutard; E Julien; V Dangouloff; B Bessieres; V Malan; T Attie; L-J Salomon; N Boddaert
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Factors affecting child development in madinah, saudi arabia.

Authors:  H Bella; S S Al-Ansari
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  1999-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.