Literature DB >> 12522267

The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules.

Janne Lehtiö1, Junji Sugiyama, Malin Gustavsson, Linda Fransson, Markus Linder, Tuula T Teeri.   

Abstract

Cellulose binding modules (CBMs) potentiate the action of cellulolytic enzymes on insoluble substrates. Numerous studies have established that three aromatic residues on a CBM surface are needed for binding onto cellulose crystals and that tryptophans contribute to higher binding affinity than tyrosines. However, studies addressing the nature of CBM-cellulose interactions have so far failed to establish the binding site on cellulose crystals targeted by CBMs. In this study, the binding sites of CBMs on Valonia cellulose crystals have been visualized by transmission electron microscopy. Fusion of the CBMs with a modified staphylococcal protein A (ZZ-domain) allowed direct immuno-gold labeling at close proximity of the actual CBM binding site. The transmission electron microscopy images provide unequivocal evidence that the fungal family 1 CBMs as well as the family 3 CBM from Clostridium thermocellum CipA have defined binding sites on two opposite corners of Valonia cellulose crystals. In most samples these corners are worn to display significant area of the hydrophobic (110) plane, which thus constitutes the binding site for these CBMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12522267      PMCID: PMC141021          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.212651999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  M Linder; T T Teeri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Characterization of a double cellulose-binding domain. Synergistic high affinity binding to crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  M Linder; I Salovuori; L Ruohonen; T T Teeri
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose.

Authors:  J Tormo; R Lamed; A J Chirino; E Morag; E A Bayer; Y Shoham; T A Steitz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose.

Authors:  E J Jervis; C A Haynes; D G Kilburn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Dynamic interaction of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases Cel6A and Cel7A and cellulose at equilibrium and during hydrolysis.

Authors:  H Palonen; M Tenkanen; M Linder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The difference in affinity between two fungal cellulose-binding domains is dominated by a single amino acid substitution.

Authors:  M Linder; G Lindeberg; T Reinikainen; T T Teeri; G Pettersson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1995-09-18       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Characterization of a Neocallimastix patriciarum cellulase cDNA (celA) homologous to Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase II.

Authors:  S Denman; G P Xue; B Patel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The adsorption of a bacterial cellulase and its two isolated domains to crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  N R Gilkes; E Jervis; B Henrissat; B Tekant; R C Miller; R A Warren; D G Kilburn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  G Carrard; A Koivula; H Söderlund; P Béguin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing.

Authors:  J Kraulis; G M Clore; M Nilges; T A Jones; G Pettersson; J Knowles; A M Gronenborn
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-09-05       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  80 in total

1.  Computational investigation of glycosylation effects on a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module.

Authors:  Courtney B Taylor; M Faiz Talib; Clare McCabe; Lintao Bu; William S Adney; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Structure of CBM3b of the major cellulosomal scaffoldin subunit ScaA from Acetivibrio cellulolyticus.

Authors:  Oren Yaniv; Yehuda Halfon; Linda J W Shimon; Edward A Bayer; Raphael Lamed; Felix Frolow
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2011-12-24

3.  Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood.

Authors:  Anwesha N Fernandes; Lynne H Thomas; Clemens M Altaner; Philip Callow; V Trevor Forsyth; David C Apperley; Craig J Kennedy; Michael C Jarvis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Role of supramolecular cellulose structures in enzymatic hydrolysis of plant cell walls.

Authors:  Lisbeth Garbrecht Thygesen; Budi Juliman Hidayat; Katja Salomon Johansen; Claus Felby
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  The biochemistry and structural biology of plant cell wall deconstruction.

Authors:  Harry J Gilbert
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Engineering of Clostridium phytofermentans Endoglucanase Cel5A for improved thermostability.

Authors:  Wenjin Liu; Xiao-Zhou Zhang; Zuoming Zhang; Y-H Percival Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Bacterial expansins and related proteins from the world of microbes.

Authors:  Nikolaos Georgelis; Nikolas Nikolaidis; Daniel J Cosgrove
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides.

Authors:  Svein J Horn; Pawel Sikorski; Jannicke B Cederkvist; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Morten Sørlie; Bjørnar Synstad; Gert Vriend; Kjell M Vårum; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Aromatic residues in the catalytic center of chitinase A from Serratia marcescens affect processivity, enzyme activity, and biomass converting efficiency.

Authors:  Henrik Zakariassen; Berit Bjugan Aam; Svein J Horn; Kjell M Vårum; Morten Sørlie; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A kinetic model for the enzymatic action of cellulase.

Authors:  Christina L Ting; Dmitrii E Makarov; Zhen-Gang Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.