| Literature DB >> 25786031 |
Ze-Yun Li1, Li-Li Ding2, Jin-Mei Li2, Bao-Li Xu2, Li Yang2, Kai-Shun Bi3, Zheng-Tao Wang2.
Abstract
Curcumin, a principle bioactive component of Curcuma longa L, is well known for its anti-hyperlipidemia effect. However, no holistic metabolic information of curcumin on hyperlipidemia models has been revealed, which may provide us an insight into the underlying mechanism. In the present work, NMR and MS based metabolomics was conducted to investigate the intervention effect of curcumin on hyperlipidemia mice induced by high-fat diet (HFD) feeding for 12 weeks. The HFD induced animals were orally administered with curcumin (40, 80 mg/kg) or lovastatin (30 mg/kg, positive control) once a day during the inducing period. Serum biochemistry assay of TC, TG, LDL-c, and HDL-c was conducted and proved that treatment of curcumin or lovastatin can significantly improve the lipid profiles. Subsequently, metabolomics analysis was carried out for urine samples. Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was employed to investigate the anti-hyperlipidemia effect of curcumin and to detect related potential biomarkers. Totally, 35 biomarkers were identified, including 31 by NMR and nine by MS (five by both). It turned out that curcumin treatment can partially recover the metabolism disorders induced by HFD, with the following metabolic pathways involved: TCA cycle, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, synthesis of ketone bodies and cholesterol, ketogenesis of branched chain amino acid, choline metabolism, and fatty acid metabolism. Besides, NMR and MS based metabolomics proved to be powerful tools in investigating pharmacodynamics effect of natural products and underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25786031 PMCID: PMC4364983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Serum biochemistry test results (n = 6).
| TC | TG | HDL-c | LDL-c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.92±0.50 | 0.37±0.05 | 2.58±0.28 | 0.68±0.09 |
|
| 5.09±0.67 | 0.44±0.08 | 3.54±0.32 | 0.89±0.12 |
|
| 4.78±0.74 | 0.40±0.07 | 3.75±0.27 | 0.73±0.08 |
|
| 4.56±0.76 | 0.40±0.08 | 3.80±0.34 | 0.71±0.10 |
|
| 4.50±0.73 | 0.41±0.09 | 3.79±0.51 | 0.66±0.07 |
Note: Con, control group; HFD, hyperlipidemia group; Cur1, curcumin treated group (40 mg/kg); Cur2, curcumin treated group (80 mg/kg); Lov, lovastatin treated group; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol;
aP< 0.01 as compared with Con group;
bP< 0.01 as compared with HFD group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by LSD test.
Fig 1Typical 600 MHz 1H-NMR spectra of mice urine from Con (a), HFD (b) and Cur2(c) groups.
Metabolites: 1, 1-methylnicotinamide; 2, Niacinamide; 3, Nicotinamide N-oxide; 4, Formate; 5, Hippurate; 6, Benzoate; 7, N-phenylacetylglycine; 8, trans-Aconitate; 9, Urea; 10, cis-Aconitate;11, Allantoin; 12, Glucose; 13, Tartrate; 14, Creatinine; 15, Creatine; 16, Creatine phosphate; 17, Taurine; 18, Choline; 19, Trimethylamine; 20, Dimethylamine;21, Citrate; 22, Methylamine; 23, Succinate; 24, Pyruvate; 25, Acetoacetate; 26, acetone; 27, Acetate; 28, Lactate; 29, Leucine / isoleucine; 30, Valine; 31, Alanine.
Fig 2OPLS-DA score plot (a), loading plot (b) of urine 1H-NMR spectra obtained from Con, HFD, Lov, GPA1, and GPA2 groups.
Potential biomarkers detected by NMR and MS, metabolic pathways, as well as fold changes between different groups (n = 6).
| Metabolites | Detected | HFD/Con | Cur1/HFD | Cur2/HFD | Lov/HFD | Metabolic pathways |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| NMR | 1.11 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.16 | Folate Metabolism |
|
| NMR | 1.28 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.84 | Hippurate synthesis |
|
| NMR | 0.73 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 1.22 | Gut microbiome-derived metabolism |
|
| NMR | 0.20 | 2.79 | 1.98 | 2.98 | |
|
| NMR | 0.39 | 2.35 | 1.98 | 3.11 | TCA cycle |
|
| NMR | 1.5 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.98 | Metabolites Related to oxidative stress and kidney damage |
|
| NMR | 0.42 | 1.26 | 1.11 | 1.48 | |
|
| NMR | 1.03 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.79 | Taurine synthesis |
|
| NMR | 1.16 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.98 | Creatine metabolism |
|
| NMR | 1.41 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.9 | Creatine metabolism |
|
| NMR | 1.15 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.67 | Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| NMR | 0.42 | 1.61 | 2.04 | 2.19 | Bile acid biosynthesis and taurine metabolism |
|
| NMR | 0.37 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.02 | Gut microbiome-derived metabolism |
|
| NMR | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.94 | Gut microbiome-derived metabolism |
|
| NMR | 0.26 | 1.25 | 1.16 | 0.95 | TCA cycle |
|
| NMR | 1.11 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.06 | Gut microbiome-derived metabolism |
|
| NMR | 0.73 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 1.27 | TCA cycle |
|
| NMR | 1.12 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 | TCA cycle, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| NMR | 1.52 | 0.89 | 1.03 | 0.91 | Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies |
|
| NMR | 1.28 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.94 | Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies |
|
| NMR | 0.78 | 1.28 | 1.21 | 1.08 | Fatty acid oxidation |
|
| NMR | 1.23 | 1.17 | 1.20 | 1.22 | Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| NMR | 1.13 | 1.20 | 1.15 | 1.29 | Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| NMR | 1.51 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | fat and protein metabolism |
|
| NMR | 1.34 | 1.37 | 1.40 | 1.38 | Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis |
|
| NMR | 1.29 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.43 | Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis |
|
| ESI+ | 5.96 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.20 | Fatty acid metabolism |
|
| ESI+ | 1.02 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.86 | Creatine metabolsim |
|
| ESI+ | 1.20 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 0.91 | Creatine metabolsim |
|
| ESI+ | 1.29 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.74 | Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis |
|
| ESI+ | 0.87 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.17 | TCA cycle |
|
| ESI+ | 2.10 | 0.55 | 1.40 | 0.67 | Fatty acid metabolism |
|
| ESI+ | 2.72 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.58 | Fatty acid metabolism |
|
| ESI+ | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.82 | Taurine synthesis |
|
| ESI- | 0.84 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 1.12 | Bile Acid Biosynthesis |
|
| ESI- | 1.07 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.98 | Taurine synthesis |
Note: HFD, Con, Cur1, Cur2, Lov represent hyperlipidemia, control, curcumin (40 mg/kg), curcumin (80 mg/kg), lovastatin (30 mg/kg) groups, separately. TMA short for trimethylamine; DMA short for dimethylamine; MA short for methylamine; MMA short for methylmalonate; CP represent creatine phosphate; Leu/ILE short for leucine and isoleucine. XXX/YYY means integral of metabolite in XXX group was divided by that of YYY group. The ratio over 1.00 indicated an increase, while ratio less than 1.00 indicated a decrease. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance followed by LSD test.
*p<0.05;
**p<0.01.
Fig 3OPLS-DA score plot (a) and S-plot (b) of urine 1H-NMR spectra obtained from HFD and Cur2 groups.
Fig 4OPLS-DA analysis of UPLC-Q-TOF/MS data of five groups.
Score plots in positive and negative modes were labeled as a and c, corresponding loading plots were assigned as b and d.
Fig 5Potential metabolic pathways disturbed in hyperglycemia mice induced by HFD and alterations by curcumin treatment.