Ying-Chao Wu1, Dong Zheng2, Jin-Jie Sun3, Zhi-Kang Zou3, Zhong-Li Ma3. 1. Chinese General Hospital of The Air Force Beijing 100142, China ; Anhui Medical University Hefei 230001, Anhui, China. 2. Anhui Medical University Hefei 230001, Anhui, China. 3. Chinese General Hospital of The Air Force Beijing 100142, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was carried out to summarize published data on the relationship between breast cancer and dietary factors. METHODS: Databases in Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Biology Medicine [CBM], WanFang, VIP) and in English (PubMed and Web of Science) were searched for articles analyzing vegetable, fruit, soy food and fat consumption and breast cancer risk published through June 30, 2013. Random effects models were used to estimate summary odds ratios (OR) based on high versus low intake, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to region, study design, paper quality and adjustment for confounding factors to detect the potential source of heterogeneity. Every study was screened according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, evaluated in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan 5.2 software was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 785 studies retrieved, 22 met inclusion criteria (13 in Chinese and 9 in English), representing 23,201 patients: 10,566 in the experimental group and 12,635 in the control group. Thirteen included studies showed vegetables consumption to be a relevant factor in breast cancer risk, OR = 0.77 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.62-0.96). Eleven studies showed fruits consumption to be relevant, OR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.93). Significant differences were also found between those who consumed soy foods, OR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.50-0.93) and those who ate a high-fat diet, OR = 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.30). CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the association between intake of vegetables, fruits, soy foods and fat and the risk of breast cancer from published sources. It's suggested that high consumption of vegetables, fruits and soy foods may reduce the risk of breast cancer, while increasing fat consumption may increase the risk.
OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was carried out to summarize published data on the relationship between breast cancer and dietary factors. METHODS: Databases in Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Biology Medicine [CBM], WanFang, VIP) and in English (PubMed and Web of Science) were searched for articles analyzing vegetable, fruit, soy food and fat consumption and breast cancer risk published through June 30, 2013. Random effects models were used to estimate summary odds ratios (OR) based on high versus low intake, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to region, study design, paper quality and adjustment for confounding factors to detect the potential source of heterogeneity. Every study was screened according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, evaluated in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan 5.2 software was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 785 studies retrieved, 22 met inclusion criteria (13 in Chinese and 9 in English), representing 23,201 patients: 10,566 in the experimental group and 12,635 in the control group. Thirteen included studies showed vegetables consumption to be a relevant factor in breast cancer risk, OR = 0.77 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.62-0.96). Eleven studies showed fruits consumption to be relevant, OR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.93). Significant differences were also found between those who consumed soy foods, OR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.50-0.93) and those who ate a high-fat diet, OR = 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.30). CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the association between intake of vegetables, fruits, soy foods and fat and the risk of breast cancer from published sources. It's suggested that high consumption of vegetables, fruits and soy foods may reduce the risk of breast cancer, while increasing fat consumption may increase the risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; dietary factor; meta-analysis
Authors: Paul Terry; Meera Jain; Anthony B Miller; Geoffrey R Howe; Thomas E Rohan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: L H Kushi; T A Sellers; J D Potter; C L Nelson; R G Munger; S A Kaye; A R Folsom Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-07-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G R Howe; T Hirohata; T G Hislop; J M Iscovich; J M Yuan; K Katsouyanni; F Lubin; E Marubini; B Modan; T Rohan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1990-04-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eunyoung Cho; Donna Spiegelman; David J Hunter; Wendy Y Chen; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pamela L Horn-Ross; K J Hoggatt; Dee W West; Melissa R Krone; Susan L Stewart; Hoda Anton; Culver Leslie Bernstei; Dennis Deapen; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Ronald K Ross; William Wright; Al Ziogas Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: S Graham; M Zielezny; J Marshall; R Priore; J Freudenheim; J Brasure; B Haughey; P Nasca; M Zdeb Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1992-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S Hüser; S Guth; H G Joost; S T Soukup; J Köhrle; L Kreienbrock; P Diel; D W Lachenmeier; G Eisenbrand; G Vollmer; U Nöthlings; D Marko; A Mally; T Grune; L Lehmann; P Steinberg; S E Kulling Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 5.153