T Geith1, M Reiser, A Baur-Melnyk. 1. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland, tobias.geith@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article discusses the morphological criteria for the differentiation between acute osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures and new imaging methods, such as diffusion-weighted and chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are presented. BACKGROUND: The differential diagnostics of osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures can be difficult in some cases. Both entities normally occur without adequate trauma and predominantly in elderly patients. IMAGING: Conventional X-ray examination is the initial imaging method of choice but is not able to reliably differentiate between the osteoporotic or metastatic etiology of a fracture. Computed tomography (CT) clearly depicts osseous destruction in metastatic fractures but lacks specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating osteoporotic and metastatic fractures. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS: The combination CT and MRI allows an accurate diagnosis with respect to an osteoprorotic or metastatic etiology in most of cases but bone marrow edema in acute fractures sometimes leads to ambiguous results and differential diagnostic problems.
OBJECTIVES: This article discusses the morphological criteria for the differentiation between acute osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures and new imaging methods, such as diffusion-weighted and chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are presented. BACKGROUND: The differential diagnostics of osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures can be difficult in some cases. Both entities normally occur without adequate trauma and predominantly in elderly patients. IMAGING: Conventional X-ray examination is the initial imaging method of choice but is not able to reliably differentiate between the osteoporotic or metastatic etiology of a fracture. Computed tomography (CT) clearly depicts osseous destruction in metastatic fractures but lacks specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating osteoporotic and metastatic fractures. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS: The combination CT and MRI allows an accurate diagnosis with respect to an osteoprorotic or metastatic etiology in most of cases but bone marrow edema in acute fractures sometimes leads to ambiguous results and differential diagnostic problems.
Authors: Tobias Geith; Andreas Biffar; Gerwin Schmidt; Steven Sourbron; Hans Roland Dürr; Maximilian Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; Andreas Biffar; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 1.777