Literature DB >> 28130579

[Imaging diagnostics in bone metastases].

L Kintzelé1, M-A Weber2.   

Abstract

Bone metastases are common, can cause a variety of relevant symptoms and are often associated with a poor prognosis. An early and accurate diagnosis is therefore crucial; however, the pattern is very heterogeneous and necessitates good knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of each imaging modality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) have the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting bone metastases. Gradient echo and diffusion-weighted sequences are valuable supplements to the MRI protocol in doubtful cases and MRI is particularly suitable for distinguishing osteoporotic from metastatic spinal fractures with a high degree of diagnostic certainty; however, CT is the modality of choice for stability assessment. Reliable imaging parameters to predict therapy response in cases of bone metastases have not yet been elucidated in large clinical trials. The PET/MRI approach has shown promising preliminary results for diagnosis of bone metastases and further studies in larger cohorts are the subject of ongoing studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone lesion; Bone metabolism; Bone stability; Spinal fracture; Treatment monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28130579     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-016-0205-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  38 in total

Review 1.  Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Radiological diagnostics of spinal tumors. Part 2: special diagnostics of intradural tumors and tumor-like lesions].

Authors:  M Wolf; J K Kloth; S Hähnel; C Rehnitz; B Wiedenhöfer; M-A Weber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

Authors:  L D Rybak; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-03

Review 5.  Bone metastases: assessment of therapeutic response through radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities.

Authors:  V Vassiliou; D Andreopoulos; S Frangos; N Tselis; E Giannopoulou; S Lutz
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Assessing response to treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer: what should be the standard of care?

Authors:  D K Woolf; A R Padhani; A Makris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  MR imaging of bone metastases and choice of sequence: spin echo, in-phase gradient echo, diffusion, and contrast medium.

Authors:  Daniel Vanel; Roberto Casadei; Marco Alberghini; Manel Razgallah; Maurizio Busacca; Ugo Albisinni
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow: current status.

Authors:  Andrea Baur; Olaf Dietrich; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  SSH-EPI diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine with low b values: is it useful in differentiating malignant metastatic tumor infiltration from benign fracture edema?

Authors:  Ozgur Oztekin; Ebru Ozan; Zehra Hilal Adibelli; Gökhan Unal; Yusuf Abali
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Atypical magnetic resonance imaging appearance of biopsy-proven spinal metastases in a trauma patient.

Authors:  Pallavi Byrapu; Sindhu John
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 2.  State-of-the-art imaging for diagnosis of metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Amanda Isaac; Danoob Dalili; Daniel Dalili; Marc-André Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.