Literature DB >> 36227532

Interest in genetic testing and risk-reducing behavioral changes: results from a community health assessment in New York City.

Sarah M Lima1, Meaghan Nazareth1, Karen M Schmitt2,3, Andria Reyes2, Elaine Fleck3, Gary K Schwartz2,4, Mary Beth Terry1,2, Grace C Hillyer5,6.   

Abstract

Risk-based genetic tests are often used to determine cancer risk, when to initiate screening, and frequency of screening, but rely on interest in genetic testing. We examined overall interest in genetic testing for cancer risk assessment and willingness to change behavior, and whether these are affected by demographic or socioeconomic factors.We conducted a community needs health survey in 2019 among primary care and cancer patients, family members and community members in New York City. We used univariable analysis and relative risk regression to examine interest in genetic cancer risk testing and willingness to modify lifestyle behaviors in response to an informative genetic test.Of the 1225 participants, 74.0% (n = 906) expressed interest in having a genetic test to assess cancer risk. Interest in genetic testing was high across all demographic and socioeconomic groups; reported interest in genetic testing by group ranged from 65.0 (participants aged 65 years and older) to 83.6% (participants below federal poverty level). Among the 906 participants that reported interest in genetic testing, 79.6% were willing to change eating habits, 66.5% to change exercise habits, and 49.5% to lose weight in response to an informative genetic test result.Our study reveals that interest in genetic testing for cancer risk is high among patients and community members and is high across demographic and socioeconomic groups, as is the reported willingness to change behavior. Based on these results, we recommend that population-based genetic testing may result in greater reduction cancer risk, particularly among minoritized groups.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer risk; Community health; Genetic testing; Lifestyle

Year:  2022        PMID: 36227532     DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00610-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  62 in total

1.  DNA testing information on YouTube: Inadequate advice can mislead and harm the public.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Grace C Hillyer; Miryam Z Wahrman; Philip Garcia; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Public health action in genomics is now needed beyond newborn screening.

Authors:  M S Bowen; K Kolor; W D Dotson; R M Ned; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Coming of age in Canada: a study of population-based genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M R Akbari; N Gojska; S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Medical Mistrust and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans.

Authors:  Leslie B Adams; Jennifer Richmond; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Wizdom Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

5.  Associations among family history of cancer, cancer screening and lifestyle behaviors: a population-based study.

Authors:  Georgiana Bostean; Catherine M Crespi; William J McCarthy
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Is a Family History of the Breast Cancer Related to Women's Cancer Prevention Behaviors?

Authors:  Neilane Bertoni; Mirian Carvalho de Souza; Susanne Crocamo; Moyses Szklo; Liz Maria de Almeida
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2019-02

7.  What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetics services and what may help?

Authors:  Anna Allford; Nadeem Qureshi; Julian Barwell; Celine Lewis; Joe Kai
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Association of Nongenetic Factors With Breast Cancer Risk in Genetically Predisposed Groups of Women in the UK Biobank Cohort.

Authors:  Kawthar Al Ajmi; Artitaya Lophatananon; Krisztina Mekli; William Ollier; Kenneth R Muir
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

9.  Increasing uptake to a lung cancer screening programme: building with communities through co-design.

Authors:  Lynsey Rachael Brown; Frank Sullivan; Shaun Treweek; Anne Haddow; Rodney Mountain; Colin Selby; Mara van Beusekom
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 10.  Evaluating the Integration of Genomics into Cancer Screening Programmes: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Sarah Briggs; Ingrid Slade
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2019-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.