Literature DB >> 25783618

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic schemes in the treatment of acromegaly: a retrospective study of 168 cases.

L Duan1, M Huang2, H Yan3, Y Zhang4, F Gu5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of two therapeutic schemes, including preoperative medical therapy and surgery as primary therapy.
METHODS: A total of 168 acromegaly cases were retrospectively investigated for a comparative evaluation of surgery and preoperative medical therapy. A Markov model was developed to simulate treatment cost-effectiveness and progression of acromegaly.
RESULTS: Overall effectiveness of preoperative medical therapy was significantly higher than surgery in acromegalic patients with macroadenoma. In addition, life expectancy, and cost per life-year gained were slightly higher in the preoperative medical therapy group than in the initial surgery group when patients received surgery as a secondary treatment. Interestingly, preoperative medical therapy achieved a significant increase in life expectancy and reduced cost for patients who received long-term medical therapy as secondary treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients with macroadenoma, the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed more satisfactory outcomes in preoperative therapy, compared with primary surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromegaly; Cancer therapy; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Macroadenoma; Markov model; Retrospective analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783618     DOI: 10.1007/s40618-015-0242-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  36 in total

Review 1.  Comparative effectiveness review of treatment options for pituitary microadenomas in acromegaly.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; Emily LaSota; Amir H Hamrahian; Robert J Weil
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Decision-analytical modelling in health-care economic evaluations.

Authors:  Xin Sun; Thomas Faunce
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-10-18

3.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly--2011 update.

Authors:  Laurence Katznelson; John L D Atkinson; David M Cook; Shereen Z Ezzat; Amir H Hamrahian; Karen K Miller
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laure Sandret; Patrick Maison; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  O M Dekkers; N R Biermasz; A M Pereira; J A Romijn; J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Efficacy and complications of neurosurgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Anna Krzentowska-Korek; Filip Gołkowski; Agata Bałdys-Waligórska; Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control.

Authors:  A Ben-Shlomo; M C Sheppard; J M Stephens; S Pulgar; S Melmed
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Acromegaly: role of surgery in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Authors:  Gerardo Guinto; Miguel Abdo; Erick Zepeda; Norma Aréchiga; Moisés Mercado
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 10.  Place of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analog on surgical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Pita-Gutierrez; Sonia Pertega-Diaz; Salvador Pita-Fernandez; Lara Pena; Gloria Lugo; Susana Sangiao-Alvarellos; Fernando Cordido
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of acromegaly treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Letícia P Leonart; Helena H L Borba; Vinicius L Ferreira; Bruno S Riveros; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Daily life reflections of acromegaly guidelines.

Authors:  T Apaydin; H M Ozkaya; F E Keskin; O A Haliloglu; K Karababa; S Erdem; P Kadioglu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Cost-effectiveness of direct surgery versus preoperative octreotide therapy for growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Shaun J Kilty; Myriam G M Hunink; Lisa Caulley; Eline Krijkamp; Mary-Anne Doyle; Kednapa Thavorn; Fahad Alkherayf; Nick Sahlollbey; Selina X Dong; Jason Quinn; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki; David Schramm
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Quality of Health Economic Evaluations in Mainland China: A Comparison of Peer-Reviewed Articles in Chinese and in English.

Authors:  Jiehua Cheng; Yu Zhang; Ailin Zhong; Miao Tian; Guanyang Zou; Xiaping Chen; Hongxing Yu; Fujian Song; Shangcheng Zhou
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Cost-Utility of Acromegaly Pharmacological Treatments in a French Context.

Authors:  Thierry Brue; Philippe Chanson; Patrice Rodien; Brigitte Delemer; Delphine Drui; Lucile Marié; Laurène Juban; Lara Salvi; Robin Henocque; Gérald Raverot
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.