Literature DB >> 22725987

Comparative effectiveness review of treatment options for pituitary microadenomas in acromegaly.

Nicholas F Marko1, Emily LaSota, Amir H Hamrahian, Robert J Weil.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Acromegaly, a syndrome of excess growth hormone (GH) secretion typically caused by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma, reduces life expectancy by approximately 10 years when left untreated. Treatment of acromegaly involves combinations of one or more discrete therapeutic modalities to achieve biochemical control. Unfortunately, data capable of informing decisions among alternate management strategies are presently lacking.
METHODS: The authors performed a comparative effectiveness research (CER) review integrating efficacy, cost, and quality of life (QOL) analysis for treatment strategies comprising various combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and pharmacotherapy in patients with acromegaly caused by a pituitary microadenoma. A management decision tree was used to identify 5 treatment strategies, each with up to 4 potential treatment steps. Efficacy was assessed using recent literature reports of biochemical control rates for each modality. Cost estimations were derived from wholesale drug prices and from the Healthcare Cost and Utility Project. Quality of life data were obtained from studies utilizing the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Individual treatment modalities were analyzed and ranked in each of 3 domains: highest rate of success, lowest cost, and highest QOL, and these scores were combined to facilitate comparison of overall effectiveness of each of the management strategies. These aggregate effectiveness scores were used to compare the 5 strategies from the decision tree, and a novel strategy was also proposed.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of management strategy must be individualized for each patient with acromegaly. This CER analysis provides a comprehensive framework to inform clinical decisions among alternate management strategies in patients with GH-secreting pituitary microadenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22725987     DOI: 10.3171/2012.4.JNS11739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  15 in total

1.  Effective time window in reducing pituitary adenoma size by gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Henry Ka-Fung Mak; Shui-Wun Lai; Wenshu Qian; Stanley Xu; Elizabeth Tong; May Lee Vance; Edward Oldfield; John Jane; Jason Sheehan; Kelvin K W Yau; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Repeat endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: remission and complications.

Authors:  Thomas J Wilson; Erin L McKean; Ariel L Barkan; William F Chandler; Stephen E Sullivan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic schemes in the treatment of acromegaly: a retrospective study of 168 cases.

Authors:  L Duan; M Huang; H Yan; Y Zhang; F Gu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Outcome of radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Patricia Sebastian; Rajesh Balakrishnan; Bijesh Yadav; Subhashini John
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-07-15

5.  Surgical treatment of prolactinomas: cons.

Authors:  Eve Bloomgarden; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of acromegaly treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Letícia P Leonart; Helena H L Borba; Vinicius L Ferreira; Bruno S Riveros; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  The surgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Multi-modal management of acromegaly: a value perspective.

Authors:  Kristopher T Kimmell; Robert J Weil; Nicholas F Marko
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surgical versus Medical Treatment of Prolactinomas.

Authors:  Corinna C Zygourakis; Brandon S Imber; Rebecca Chen; Seunggu J Han; Lewis Blevins; Annette Molinaro; James G Kahn; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-09-27

Review 10.  New therapeutic agents for acromegaly.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.