| Literature DB >> 25781610 |
Jae Heon Kim1, Sung Ryul Shim2, Seung Whan Doo1, Won Jae Yang1, Byung Wook Yoo3, Joyce Mary Kim4, Young Myoung Ko5, Eun Seop Song6, Ik Sung Lim7, Hong Jun Lee8, Yun Seob Song1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bladder dysfunction induced by spinal cord injury (SCI) can become problematic and severely impair the quality of life. Preclinical studies of spinal cord injury have largely focused on the recovery of limb function while neglecting to investigate bladder recovery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25781610 PMCID: PMC4363872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Method for study search and selection for inclusion.
Details of studies investigating stem cell-based cell therapy in spinal cord injury and bladder dysfunction.
| Author | Injured level | Injury mechanism | Admitted cell | Route | Remarks | Expected mechanism | Graft survival confirmation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| T8–9 | Transection | BMSC, Bone marrow stromal cell | Intravenous | External urethral sphincter activity was checked, Cooridnation between bladder activity and EUS was checked | No sparing of descending modulatory pathway. Reorganization of synaptic connections. Formation of new pathways of voiding reflex | Immunohistochemistry of BrdU reactive cell |
|
| T9–10 | Contusion | GRP, GDA | Direct injection | Daily records of bladder size and urine color, Human GRP and GDA did not promote axon growth | Neuroprotection, axonal sprouting, regeneration or myelination | HuNA (+) Immunofluorescence |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | Human MSC | Direct injection | BDNF and NT-3 levels were checked by ELISA and RT-PCR at 28 and 56 days after MSC transplantation. No bladder recovery | Transplanted MSCs could reduce inflammatory process | Immunohistochemistry of anti-human nucleus antibody |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | NRP/GRP, AMPA/kinase blocker (NBQX) | Direct injection | Combined treatment using NRP/GRP and NBQX | Combined treatment have a potential of protection of host tissue and reduction of secondary injury | Not checked |
|
| T8–9 | Transection, incomplete | Human umbilical cord MSC | Direct injection | Masson trichome stain used to demonstrate bladder morphology | Bladder structure change by reducing inflammation. Lamina propia layer change demonstrates reduced inflammation | Not checked |
|
| T9–10 | Hemisection | NRP/GRP, BMSC | Direct injection | Camparison of transplantation using NRP/GRP and BMSC | Neurogenesis by the capacity to grow new neurons from neural stem/progenitor cells | Direct count of cells |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | Fb-BDNF, Fb-NT3 | Direct injection | Genetically modified fibroblast | Partial bladder recovery is mediated by the greater density of some descending fibers and decreased density of small caliber primary afferent projections by BDNF or NT3. Tissue sparing throughout the white matter and differentiation into neurons and glia | Direct cell confirmation by Nissl myelin staining. mmunoreactivity for RT-97 |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | NPC, Neural progenitor cell | Direct injection or lumbar puncture graft | Different route and method were compared. Direct injection vs lumbar puncture graft. Lumbar puncture graft showed localization at the dorsal aspect rather than entire injury site, which results in partial recovery of motor function | Direct cell confirmation by Nissl myelin staining. Alkaline phosphatase histochemistry | |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | NRP/GRP | Direct injection | Examined the alpha-1A adrenergic antagonist effects. Tamsulosin showed positive effect in voiding pressure | Local protection provided by NRP/GRP results in increased sparing/sprouting of descending pathways. Modification of lumbosacral circuitry | Direct cell confirmation by Nissl myelin staining. Alkaline phosphatase histochemistry |
|
| T8–9 | Contusion | EG6 immortalized neural stem cell | Direct injection | Observed difference in the degree of functional recovery between detrusor and external urethral sphincter: Functional recovery of somatic nerves is more easily accomplished by transplanted EG6 cells | Transplanted EG6 cells might differentiate and promote regeneration of injured spinal cord | Confirmation with BrdU immunohistochemistry |
GRP, glial-restricted precursor; GDA, derived astrocytes; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; BDNF: brain derived neurotrophic factor; NRP, neuronal-restricted precursor; NBQX, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo(f)quinoxaline; BMSC, bone marrow stromal cell; NT-3,neurotrophin-3; Fb, fibroblast; NPC
Study details including defense mechanisms, stability and plasticity of stem cells in stem cell-based cell therapy for SCI and bladder dysfunction.
| Author | Migration | Host effects: spared host tissue, cyst and scar formation | Plasticity or projections | Differentiation | Functional recovery | Sensory recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Yes | Not checked | L3–4 | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked |
|
| Yes, long distance | Reduced cyst and scar formation. Reduced CSPG expression. Reduced glial scar formation | L6-S1, GRP Group showed reduced CGRP sprouting, GDA group showed higher 5-HT immunoreactivity | Differentiated into glial cells | No significant recovery in BBB test and grid test | Pain perception improved Thermal sensitivity (heat test). Mechanical sensitivity (Von Frey test) |
|
| No checked | Not checked | BDNF and NT-3 levels showed no difference at thoracic and lumbar vertebrae L5-S1 | Not differentiated | Limited recovery in chronic state in BBB test, coupling score, and ladder score | Not checked |
|
| No checked | Reduced cyst and cavity formation | 5HT positive fibers showed higher density in both DL and DH. CGRP positive fibers in small diameter dorsal root afferents | Not checked | Recovery in BBB test | Not checked |
|
| Not checked | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked |
|
| Not checked | Not checked | T9–10, E-NCAM (+), A2B5(+) | Neuronal differentiation | Not checked | Not checked |
|
| Confirmed by Nissl-myelin staining | No difference in astrocytic scar formation | L6-S1, Afferent pathways using CGRP and VR-1. Suppression in transplanted group. No change in synaptic density. Descending pathways using 5HT, CRF, DβH. Postive for markers for neurons (MAP-2). Partially preserved or stimulated sprouting. No axonal growth by GAP-43 | Partially neuronal regeneration. No axonal growth | No significant recovery in BBB test and recovery in grid test | No change in thermal sensitivity test |
|
| Some graft derived glial cells migrated away from the graft tissues Confirmed by Nissl myelin staining | Both group showed reduction in injury size and tissue sparing | L4–5, Oligodendrocytes (RIP) and astrocytes (GFAP) | Presence of neuronal and glial phenotypes. Neuronal differentiation | Intermediate recovery in BBB test | Not checked |
|
| Confirmed by Nissl myelin staining | Spared host tissue and cyst developed fewer | L6-S1, Afferent pathways: no differences in CGRP, VR-1, GAP43. Synaptophysin projections. NRP/GRP transplants inhibit dorsal root sprouting: CRF and DβH were diminished but lesser extent in transplant group. Sprouting or sparing of these pathways. | Neuronal differentiation Axonal neurofilaments with RT 97 antibody astrocyte differentiation with GFAP | Greater recovery of hindlimb function but similar results in grid test | Improvement in the thermal stimulus |
|
| BrdU, Migration into white matter | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked | Not checked |
CSPG, Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan;, neuronal-restricted precursor; VR-1,vanilloid receptor type 1; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; DL, Dorsolateral nucleus; DH, Dorsal horn; BBB, Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan; 5-HT, serotonin; DβH, dopamine-β-hydroxylase; CRF, corticotropin releasing factor; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GRP, glial-restricted precursor; GAP43, growth-associated protein 43
Urodynamic study results of the eight enrolled studies.
| Author | Admitted time | Cystometry time | Cystometric findings | Sham | Control | Transplanted group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 9 days after injury | 28 days after transplantation | N = 6 | N = 8 | N = 8 | |
| Voiding pressure | 26.35±4.18 | 40.74±3.97 | 33.82±3.79 | |||
| Residual urine (ml) | 0.1±0.08 | 1.53±0.68 | 0.89±0.17 | |||
| Bladder capacity (ml) | 0.35±0.14 | 1.57±0.68 | 1.20±0.22 | |||
| Voiding efficiency (%) | 70.38±10.10 | 2.78±1.46 | 26.25±6.93 | |||
| NVC | 0 | 9.67±3.83 | 2.13±1.13 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 8 weeks after transplantation | N = 4 | N = 10 | N = 9, Transplanted CRP | |
| Voiding pressure | 15.58±2.58 | 42.32±4.07 | 36.21±1.72 | |||
| Residual urine | 0±0 | 0.12±0.08 | 0.42±0.13 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.33±0.03 | 0.60±0.20 | 1.04±0.10 | |||
| NVC | 0.25±0.15 | 16.36±5.57 | 6.25±0.79 | |||
| Bladder weight: body weight ratio (g) | 0.61±0.02 | 1.3±0.07 | 1.43±0.09 | |||
| N = 4 | N = 10 | N = 6, Transplanted GDA | ||||
| Voiding pressure | 15.58±2.58 | 42.32±4.07 | 37.21±2.04 | |||
| Residual urine | 0±0 | 0.12±0.08 | 0.13±0.08 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.33±0.03 | 0.60±0.20 | 0.53±0.05 | |||
| NVC | 0.25±0.15 | 16.36±5.57 | 19.25±1.70 | |||
| Bladder weight: body weight ratio (g) | 0.61±0.02 | 1.3±0.07 | 1.38±0.08 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 28 days and 56 days | N = 7 | N = 11 | N = 9, Transplanted (28 days) | |
| Voiding pressure | 9.21±5.30 | 9.60±4.2 | 9.70±4.11 | |||
| NVC (%) | 43 | 36 | 44 | |||
| Voiding frequency (time/min) | 0.80±0.09 | 0.82±0.16 | 0.76±0.32 | |||
| Bladder volume (mm3) | 1345.25±1206.27 | 1263.75±838.05 | 1279.57±1310.69 | |||
| N = 7 | N = 9 | N = 6, Transplanted (56 days) | ||||
| Voiding pressure | 9.00±5.77 | 8.11±7.39 | 10.33±4.50 | |||
| NVC (%) | 43 | 44 | 50 | |||
| Voiding frequency (time/min) | 0.79±0.11 | 0.82±0.19 | 0.92±0.07 | |||
| Bladder volume (mm3) | 1874.47±1452.13 | 1925.99±1591.44 | 1594.45±703.36 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 7 weeks after transplantation | N = 9 | N = 10, Transplanted (NRP/GRP) | ||
| Voiding pressure | 36.1±2.7 | 27.9±2.0 | ||||
| Residual urine | 0.16±0.04 | 0.14±0.08 | ||||
| Bladder capacity | 1.54±0.06 | 1.53±0.17 | ||||
| NVC | 7.0±1.0 | 3.4±0.9 | ||||
| Bladder weight (mg) | 368.3±35.0 | 289.6±19.6 | ||||
|
| 9 days after injury | 28 days after transplantation | N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 10, Transplanted (NRP/GRP) | |
| Voiding pressure | 24.90±4.03 | 61.80±9.41 | 43.40±5.71 | |||
| Residual volume | 0.05±0.07 | 1.61±0.23 | 0.64±0.12 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.57±0.13 | 1.89±0.18 | 1.64±0.13 | |||
| NVC | 0.20±0.44 | 5.80±2.58 | 4.10±1.91 | |||
| Baseline pressure | 2.15±0.54 | 8.78±0.55 | 3.38±0.30 | |||
| Voiding volume | 0.56±0.12 | 0.27±0.05 | 1.02±0.08 | |||
| N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 9, Transplanted (BMSC) | ||||
| Voiding pressure | 24.90±4.03 | 61.80±9.41 | 53.10±7.88 | |||
| Residual volume | 0.05±0.07 | 1.61±0.23 | 0.79±0.20 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.57±0.13 | 1.89±0.18 | 1.70±0.10 | |||
| NVC | 0.20±0.44 | 5.80±2.58 | 4.90±2.60 | |||
| Baseline pressure | 2.15±0.54 | 8.78±0.55 | 5.16±1.03 | |||
| Voiding volume | 0.56±0.12 | 0.27±0.05 | 0.90±0.18 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 8 weeks after transplantation | N = 6 | N = 11 | N = 12 | |
| Voiding pressure | 19.5±1.0 | 35.9±1.4 | 28.2±0.9 | |||
| Residual volume | 0.03±0.01 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.23±0.09 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.44±0.06 | 1.07±0.09 | 1.12±0.12 | |||
| NVC | 0 | 6.7±1.0 | 3.2±0.8 | |||
| Bladder weight | 119.3±6.7 | 376.8±31.7 | 279.8±17.8 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 8 weeks after transplantation | N = 6 | N = 10 | N = 8 | |
| Voiding pressure | 19.5±1.0 | 33.4±1.2 | 27.9±2.0 | |||
| Residual volume | 0.03±0.01 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.14±0.08 | |||
| Bladder capacity | 0.44±0.06 | 1.66±0.19 | 1.53±0.17 | |||
| NVC | 0 | 7.2±1.0 | 3.4±0.9 | |||
| Bladder weight | 119.3±6.7 | 376.8±33.4 | 289.6±19.6 | |||
|
| 9 days after injury | 28 days after transplantation | N = 5 | N = 7 | ||
| Voiding pressure | 39.0±7.4 | 23.2±4.2 | ||||
| Residual volume | 3.14±1.84 | 0.94±0.75 | ||||
| Voiding volume | 0.94±0.30 | 1.13±0.22 | ||||
| Voiding efficiency (%) | 27.9±16.6 | 60.7±19.8 | ||||
| NVC (%) | 60 | 57 |
NVC, non-voiding contraction (No. of episodes/micturition);NRP, neuronal-restricted precursor; GRP, glial-restricted precursor; NBQX, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo(f)quinoxaline
*:p<0.05, transplanted group vs. control
Fig 2Risk of bias summary.
A review of the author’s judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study. “+”is “low risk”, “-“is “high risk”, “?” is “unclear”.
Fig 3Forest plot diagram showing the effect of stem cell-based cell transplantation on voiding pressure.
The black diamond signifies the mean difference is in favor of voiding pressure. The size of each square depends on the weight of each study. All data provided are for continuous outcomes.
Fig 4Forest plot diagram showing the effect of stem cell-based cell transplantation on residual urine.
The black diamond signifies that the mean difference is in residual urine. The size of each square depends on the weight of each study. All data provided are for continuous outcomes.
Fig 5Forest plot diagram showing the effect of stem cell-based cell transplantation on non-voiding contraction (NVC).
The black diamond signifies the mean difference is in favor of NVC. The size of each square depends on the weight of each study. All data provided are for continuous outcomes.
Fig 6Forest plot diagram showing the effect of stem cell-based cell transplantation on bladder capacity.
The black diamond signifies the mean difference is in favor of bladder capacity. The size of each square depends on the weight of each study. All data provided are for continuous outcomes.
Fig 7Funnel plot with peusdo 95% confidence limit.