| Literature DB >> 25780697 |
Rupal A Vasant1, Namrata D Patel1, Sanjay S Karn1, Amaravadi V R L Narasimhacharya1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to investigate the lipid and the antioxidant regulatory potential of a multigrain diet in laboratory animals with reference to lipid profiles, tissue lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status.Entities:
Keywords: enzymatic antioxidants; fecal lipids; lipid metabolism; multigrain; non-enzymatic antioxidants; oxidative stress
Year: 2014 PMID: 25780697 PMCID: PMC4331993 DOI: 10.3831/KPI.2014.17.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharmacopuncture ISSN: 2093-6966
Effects of a multigrain-formulated diet on the plasma lipid profiles of the experimental animals
| Parameters | CD | CDC | FD | FDC | Difference (%)FD | Difference (%)FDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TL* | 685.2 ± 16.3 | 919.01 ± 34.85† | 671.30 ± 7.74† | 756.90 ± 10.61†‡§ | -2.03 | -17.63 |
| TC* | 74.51 ± 1.90 | 118.30 ± 3.63† | 72.53 ± 1.60† | 87.90 ± 4.44†‡§ | -2.66 | -25.70 |
| TG* | 71.63 ± 1.58 | 130.8 ± 8.05† | 61.34 ± 3.22† | 83.22 ± 3.87†‡§ | -14.36 | -36.38 |
| LDL-C* | 23.52 ± 2.51 | 34.42 ± 2.75† | 21.40 ± 2.31† | 21.29 ± 1.85†‡§ | -9.01 | -38.15 |
| VLDL-C* | 14.32 ± 0.37 | 26.56 ± 1.84† | 11.74 ± 0.43† | 16.20 ± 0.74†‡§ | -18.01 | -39.00 |
| HDL-C* | 33.85 ± 0.51 | 26.37 ± 1.12† | 39.60 ± 1.08† | 58.62 ± 1.68†‡§ | +16.99 | +122.30 |
| AI | 2.04 ± 0.09 | 2.07 ± 0.03† | 1.87 ± 0.09† | 1.77 ± 0.03†‡§ | -8.33 | -14.49 |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5); P< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant;*mg/dL† compared with CD;‡ compared with FD;§ compared with CDC; CD, commercial diet; FD, formulated diet; CDC, commercial diet with cholesterol; FDC, formulated diet with cholesterol; TL, total lipid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; VLDL-C, VLDL cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; AI = TC/HDL-C.
Effects of a multigrain-formulated diet on the hepatic and the fecal lipid profiles and on the HMG-CoA reductase activity of the experimental animals
| Parameters | CD | CDC | FD | FDC | Difference (%) | Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatic TL* | 18.67 ± 2.45 | 34.67 ± 2.86‡ | 14.25 ± 0.27‡ | 16.00 ± 1.03§|| | -23.67 | -53.85 |
| Fecal TL* | 5.33 ± 1.33 | 21.33 ± 1.33‡ | 6.62 ± 0.08‡ | 38.67 ± 1.33§|| | +24.20 | +81.29 |
| Hepatic TC* | 21.31 ± 0.79 | 66.92 ± 1.42‡ | 15.50 ± 0.36‡ | 24.25 ± 0.46§|| | -27.26 | -63.76 |
| Fecal TC* | 53.05 ± 3.15 | 129.30 ± 6.83‡ | 61.34 ± 0.34‡ | 142.92 ± 5.26§|| | +15.63 | +10.53 |
| Hepatic TG* | 1.70 ± 0.026 | 3.79 ± 0.29‡ | 1.68 ± 0.014‡ | 2.07 ± 0.22§|| | -1.17 | -45.38 |
| Hepatic bile acid* | 2.44 ± 0.02 | 2.71 ± 0.25‡ | 2.31 ± 0.01‡ | 4.69 ± 0.07§|| | +5.33 | +73.06 |
| Fecal bile acid* | 6.57 ± 0.89 | 7.20 ± 0.69‡ | 6.8 ± 0.83¶ | 8.16 ± 1.00§|| | +3.50 | +13.33 |
| Hepatic HMG- CoA† | 5.75 ± 0.47 | 8.02 ± 0.07‡ | 5.73 ± 0.23‡ | 6.40 ± 0.11§|| | -0.35 | -20.20 |
Values are means ± SEMs (n = 5); P< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant;*mg/g† HMG-CoA reductase activity is inversely proportional to the ratio of HMG-CoA to mevalonate;‡ compared with CD;§ compared with FD;|| compared with CDC; CD, commercial diet; FD: formulated diet; CDC, commercial diet with cholesterol; FDC, formulated diet with cholesterol;¶not significant; TL, total lipid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA.
Effects of a multigrain-formulated diet on the hepatic lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status of the experimental animals
| Parameters | CD | CDC | FD | FDC | Difference (%) | Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS1 | 187.11 ± 1.69 | 211.51 ± 0.90* | 167.90 ± 1.24* | 194.60 ± 0.88†‡ | -10.27 | -7.85 |
| SOD2 | 1.61 ± 0.17 | 1.16 ± 0.12* | 1.77 ± 0.03* | 1.51 ± 0.02†‡ | +9.94 | +30.17 |
| TAA3 | 181.91 ± 1.21 | 152.70 ± 1.05* | 199.11 ± 1.64* | 164.4 ± 0.77†‡ | +9.45 | +7.66 |
| CAT4 | 62.37 ± 0.93 | 55.21 ± 0.48* | 66.96 ± 0.19* | 61.65 ± 0.53†‡ | +7.36 | +11.66 |
| GSH5 | 70.69 ± 4.17 | 47.00 ± 1.00* | 75.21 ± 1.15* | 60.01 ± 1.12†‡ | +6.39 | +27.68 |
| GPx2 | 14.02 ± 0.48 | 11.82 ± 0.32* | 14.73 ± 0.47* | 12.86 ± 0.22†‡ | +5.06 | +8.80 |
Values are means ± SEMs (n = 5); P< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant;1nM MDA/g;2U/mg protein;3μg/g;4nM H2O2decomposed/ s/g;5mg/100 g;* compared with CD;† compared with FD;‡ compared with CDC; CD, commercial diet; FD, formulated diet; CDC, commercial diet with cholesterol; FDC, formulated diet with cholesterol; TBARS, Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TAA, total ascorbic acid; CAT, catalase; GSH, glutathione;GPx, glutathione peroxidase.
Effects of a multigrain-formulated diet on the renal lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status of the experimental animals
| Parameters | CD | CDC | FD | FDC | Difference (%)FD | Difference (%)FDC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS1 | 180.76 ± 0.98 | 283.40 ± 3.42* | 169.56 ± 0.55* | 205.52 ± 0.52†‡ | -6.20 | -27.48 |
| SOD2 | 1.38 ± 0.04 | 1.11 ± 0.92* | 1.49 ± 0.01* | 1.37 ± 0.017†‡ | +7.97 | +23.42 |
| TAA3 | 244.80 ± 2.13 | 224.80 ± 3.79* | 261.41 ± 2.72* | 229.90 ± 1.11†‡ | +6.78 | +2.27 |
| CAT4 | 27.52 ± 0.76 | 25.65 ± 1.55* | 30.17 ± 0.20* | 27.60 ± 0.33†‡ | +9.63 | +7.60 |
| GSH5 | 46.22 ± 2.52 | 35.46 ± 2.20* | 50.30 ± 2.20* | 42.96 ± 1.05†‡ | +8.83 | 21.15 |
| GPx2 | 11.82 ± 0.49 | 10.32 ± 0.13* | 12.09 ± 0.16* | 11.67 ± 0.14†‡ | +2.28 | +13.08 |
Values are means ± SEMs (n = 5); P< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant;1nM MDA/g;2U/mg protein;3μg/g;4nM H2O2 decomposed/ s/g; 5mg/100 g;* compared with CD;† compared with FD;‡ compared with CDC; CD, commercial diet; FD, formulated diet; CDC, commercial diet with cholesterol; FDC, formulated diet with cholesterol; TBARS, Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TAA, total ascorbic acid; CAT, catalase; GSH, glutathione;GPx, glutathione peroxidase.