| Literature DB >> 25780492 |
Emiro Buendía1, Josefina Zakzuk2, Dilia Mercado1, Alvaro Alvarez3, Luis Caraballo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common chronic disease worldwide and Ascaris lumbricoides infection (ascariasis) is frequent in tropical regions. However, the effect of ascariasis on asthma severity has not been sufficiently explored. We sought to evaluate the influence of the IgE immune response to Ascaris extract and purified house dust mites (HDM) and Ascaris allergens on indicators of asthma severity in patients living in the tropics.Entities:
Keywords: Ascariasis; Ascaris; Asthma severity; Atopy; Blomia tropicalis; Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus; House dust mites; IgE; Lung function; Poverty; The tropics; Urban
Year: 2015 PMID: 25780492 PMCID: PMC4347909 DOI: 10.1186/s40413-015-0058-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World Allergy Organ J ISSN: 1939-4551 Impact factor: 4.084
Figure 1Flow-chart of data collection and response rates in the study. Responses rates (left boxes) are shown as a percentage, relative to the total number of recruited individuals. Exclusion criteria, applied during recruitment, and missing data cases (right boxes) are also detailed.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28.1 (23.0- 33.3) | 36.9 (29.9 - 44.0) | 13.6 (7.0 - 20.2) | <0.0001 |
|
| 32.9 ± 16.9 | 35.96 ± 15.7 | 31.1 ± 17.3 | 0.01 |
|
| ||||
|
| 62.3 (56.8 - 67.8) | 67.7 (60.9-74.5) | 53.4. (44.0-62.8) | |
|
| 31.6 (26.3 - 36.9) | 29.2 (22.6-35.9) | 35.6. (26.5-44.7) | <0.01 |
|
| 6.1(3.3 - 8.9) | 3.1 (0.4-5.8) | 11.0 (4.9-17.1) | |
|
| 5.1 (2.5-7.7) | 3.4 (0.6-5.2) | 6.2 (4.3 - 16.1) | 0.42 |
|
| 26.5 (21.5-31-6) | 30.8 (24.0-37.5) | 19.5 (11.9 – 27.1) | 0.02 |
|
| 3.8 (1.7 – 6.0) | 6.2 (2.5-9.8) | 0 (0) | 0.04 |
|
| 62.3 (56.8 – 67.8) | 66.7 (59.8 – 73.5) | 55.1 (45.7 – 64.5) | 0.04 |
|
| 85.6 (81.6 - 89.7) | 87.2 (82.2 - 92.1) | 83.1 (75.9 - 90.2) | 0.31 |
|
| 79.9 (74.4 – 85.4) | 84.2 (77.8 – 90.6) | 72.9 (62.9 – 83.0) | 0.04 |
|
| 67.4 (62.1 72.8) | 84.6 (79.3 - 90.0) | 39.0 (29.8 - 48.2) | <0.0001 |
|
| 60.7 (55.1 - 66.3) | 75.4 (69.1 – 81.7) | 36.4 (27.3-45.6) | <0.0001 |
|
| 349.436 ± 1177.4 | 585.4 ± 1412.1 | 149.0 ± 201.3 | <0.0001 |
|
| 2.37 ± 30.9 | 11.98 ± 34.99 | 0.13 ± 15.52 | <0.0001 |
|
| 0.94 ± 34.6 | 4.04 ± 39.27 | 0.09 ± 21.12 | <0.0001 |
Frequency rates (%) for categorical variables are shown. Their 95% confident intervals are shown in parenthesis.
*Trend analysis.
‡ Geometric mean (standard deviation of mean) are reported.
†Comparison by Mann–Whitney U Test.
Clinical indicators of disease severity: univariate analysis
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 201 (64.2) |
|
|
| 147 (65.3) | 54 (61.4) | 0.51 |
|
| 272 (86.9) | 169 (86.7) | 103 (87.3) | 0.53 |
|
|
|
|
| 78 (24.9) |
|
|
| 59 (26.2) | 19 (21.8) | 0.34 |
|
| 38 (12.1) | 25 (12.8) | 13 (11.1) | 0.53 | 30 (13.3) | 8 (9.1) | 0.30 |
Significant associations are in bold.
sensitization and indicators of asthma severity: multivariate logistic regression analysis
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.90 | 1.13 - 3.18 | 0.02 | 1.90 | 1.08 - 3.34 | 0.03 |
|
| 2.31 | 1.26 - 4.22 | 0.01 | 2.23 | 1.15 - 4.30 | 0.02 |
|
| 1.87 | 1.05 - 3.31 | 0.03 | 1.36 | 0.73 - 2.52 | 0.33 |
Model 1: Adjusted by age, gender, socioeconomic strata and tobacco exposition.
Model 2: Model 1 plus HDM sensitization.
Influence of HDM or sensitization on lung function parameters
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||
|
| 71.40 ± 20.61 | 70.38 ± 20.50 | 73.02 ± 20.75 | 0.31 | 71.03 ± 20.78 | 72.38 ± 20.27 | 0.64 |
|
| 77.70 ± 18.60 | 77.30 ± 18.11 | 78.32 ± 19.41 | 0.67 | 77.89 ± 18.60 | 77.21 ± 18.70 | 0.79 |
|
| 86.08 ± 15.80 | 85.42 ± 16.07 | 87.14 ± 15.37 | 0.39 | 85.17 ± 15.88 | 88.48 ± 15.42 | 0.13 |
|
| |||||||
|
| 158 (60.31) | 100 (62.5) | 58 (56.9) | 0.36 | 117 (61.6) | 41 (56.9) | 0.49 |
|
| 100 (38.2) | 67 (34.4) | 33 (28.0) | 0.11 | 81 (42.6) | 19 (26.4) |
|
Figure 2Correlation among , and - specific IgE values. Log transformed values were represented in this superimposed dispersion plot; linear regression slopes for B. tropicalis – Ascaris (black) and D. pteronyssinus – Ascaris (grey) [X-Y] pairs are also shown.
Figure 3IgE responses to HDM-specific allergens according to Ascaris sensitization. IgE response to Der p 2, a specific marker for Dermatophagoides spp. and Blo t 5, a specific marker for Blomia tropicalis among Ascaris sensitized and non sensitized (Ascaris neg.) subjects. * p < 0.001.