Literature DB >> 25780332

Use of noncontrast computed tomography of the inferior vena cava for real-time imaging guidance for the placement of inferior vena cava filters.

Michael A Winkler1, Palak M Majmudar1, Kevin P Landwehr1, Stephen B Hobbs1, Sibu P Saha1.   

Abstract

Appropriate placement of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter necessitates imaging of the renal veins because when an IVC filter is deployed its tip should be at or below the inferior aspect of the inferiormost renal vein. Traditionally, imaging during placement of IVC filters has been with conventional cavography and fluoroscopy. Recently, intravascular ultrasound has been used for the same purpose but with additional expense. Morbidly obese patients often exceed the weight limit of fluoroscopy tables. In addition, short obese patients are at risk of falling from narrow fluoroscopy tables. For such patients, computed tomography (CT) guidance is a viable alternative to conventional fluoroscopic guidance. IVC placement was performed in the CT suite for two obese patients who exceeded the weight limits of the available fluoroscopy tables. In one case, a Vena-Tech filter (Braun Medical, Melsungen, Germany) was placed using CT fluoroscopy. In the second case, a Recovery (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) filter was placed using intermittent limited z-axis scanning. In the first case, the filter was placed below the level of the renal veins and above the confluence of the iliac veins, which is acceptable placement. In the second case, with refinement of technique, the filter tip was placed less than 1 cm below the inferiormost renal vein, which is considered optimal placement. CT of the IVC precisely images the renal veins and can characterize their number and their confluence with the IVC. CT guidance is a viable alternative to fluoroscopic guidance for the placement of IVC filters in morbidly obese patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; deep vein thrombosis; filterplacementguidance; inferior vena cava; obesity

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780332      PMCID: PMC4347820          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1389648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  7 in total

1.  Abdominal computed tomography and the placement of inferior vena caval filters.

Authors:  Paul A Vesco; Mark E Falimirski; H Kenneth Williams; Aurelio Rodriguez; Joseph Young
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-06

2.  CT fluoroscopic guided insertion of inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  P Ignotus; C Wetton; J Berry
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Correlation of intravascular ultrasound and computed tomography scan measurements for placement of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Sean Hislop; Dustin Fanciullo; Adam Doyle; Jennifer Ellis; Ankur Chandra; David L Gillespie
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Ultrasound-guidance can reduce adverse events during femoral central venous cannulation.

Authors:  John T Powell; Jennifer T Mink; Jason T Nomura; Brian J Levine; Neil Jasani; Wendy L Nichols; James Reed; Paul R Sierzenski
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli.

Authors:  L J Greenfield; J R McCurdy; P P Brown; R C Elkins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter: percutaneous introduction.

Authors:  S M Tadavarthy; W Castaneda-Zuniga; E Salomonowitz; G Lund; A Cragg; D Hunter; C Coleman; K Amplatz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The value of preprocedure computed tomography for planning insertion of inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jaskolka; Rachel P W Kwok; Sara H Gray; Hamid R Mojibian
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.248

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.