Literature DB >> 24462032

Ultrasound-guidance can reduce adverse events during femoral central venous cannulation.

John T Powell1, Jennifer T Mink1, Jason T Nomura1, Brian J Levine1, Neil Jasani1, Wendy L Nichols1, James Reed2, Paul R Sierzenski1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation (CVC) has become the recommended best practice and has been shown to improve placement success and reduce complications. There is a dearth of studies that evaluate emergency point-of-care ultrasound guidance of femoral CVC.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine if point-of-care ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC decreases adverse events and increases the likelihood of successful placement when compared with the landmark technique.
METHODS: We conducted an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, observational study of consecutive patients who required CVC. Physicians who performed CVC completed a standardized, web-based data sheet for a national CVC registry. We evaluated single-institution data regarding CVC site, ultrasound usage, CVC indication, and mechanical complications (e.g., pneumothorax, arterial puncture, failed access, catheter misdirection, and hematoma). The study period was between January 2006 and June 2010. Analysis using Pearson's χ(2) and Agresti-Coull binomial confidence intervals was performed; significance was defined as p < 0.05.
RESULTS: We evaluated data for 143 patients who had femoral CVC in our institution. Sixty CVCs (42%) were performed under ultrasound guidance, 83 (58%) via landmark technique (p = 0.0159); 3.3% of femoral central venous lines placed by ultrasound guidance had recorded adverse events compared with 9.6% for the landmark technique (p = 0.145). There was no statistically significant difference in complications between ultrasound-guidance and landmark techniques. Our data showed a trend toward decreased rates of arterial puncture and reduced cannulation attempts resulting in improved placement success.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC might decrease complications and improve placement success, although we cannot recommend this approach without additional data. We recommend a larger study to further evaluate this technique.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside ultrasound; central venous catheterization; femoral; point-of-care ultrasound; procedural guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462032     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

Review 1.  Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: cannulation techniques.

Authors:  Carlo Banfi; Matteo Pozzi; Nils Siegenthaler; Marie-Eve Brunner; Didier Tassaux; Jean-Francois Obadia; Karim Bendjelid; Raphaël Giraud
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Use of noncontrast computed tomography of the inferior vena cava for real-time imaging guidance for the placement of inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Michael A Winkler; Palak M Majmudar; Kevin P Landwehr; Stephen B Hobbs; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03

3.  Central line complications.

Authors:  Craig Kornbau; Kathryn C Lee; Gwendolyn D Hughes; Michael S Firstenberg
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

4.  Barriers to ultrasound guidance for central venous access: a survey among Dutch intensivists and anaesthesiologists.

Authors:  Harm J Scholten; Esther Ten Bloemendal; Bente Botter; Hendrikus H M Korsten; R Arthur Bouwman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Image intensification - A solution for difficult guidewire insertion for central venous access: A case report.

Authors:  Laurence Weinberg; Matthew Yii BBiomed; Michael Li BBiomed; Maleck Louis BBiomed; Dong Kyu Lee; Laurie Doolan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.