| Literature DB >> 25779365 |
Jaesung Heo1, Mison Chun1, O Kyu Noh2, Young-Taek Oh1, Kwang Wook Suh3, Jun Eun Park4, Oyeon Cho1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between the circulating lymphocyte level during preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Lymphocyte count; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pathologic complete response; Predictive factor; Rectal neoplasms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25779365 PMCID: PMC4720072 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | No. of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 38 (73.1) |
| Female | 14 (26.9) |
| Median age (range, yr) | 34-77 (56) |
| Histologic type | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 51 (98.1) |
| Signet ring cell | 1 (1.9) |
| Clinical T stage | |
| T2 | 3 (5.8) |
| T3 | 41 (78.8) |
| T4 | 8 (15.4) |
| Clinical N stage | |
| N-negative | 5 (9.6) |
| N-positive | 47 (90.4) |
| Type of surgery | |
| LAR | 36 (69.2) |
| APR | 16 (30.8) |
| CEA level (ng/mL) | |
| ≥ 4.4 | 26 (50.0) |
| < 4.4 | 26 (50.0) |
LAR, lower anterior resection; APR, abdominoperineal resection; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.
Fig. 1.Change of blood cell count value over time. (A) Absolute cell count. (B) Relative cell count. Data points indicate mean value and error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. WBC, white blood cell.
Univariate analyses for variables associated with pathologic complete response
| Variable | Pathologic complete response | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 8 | 30 | 0.16 |
| Female | 6 | 8 | |
| Age (yr) | |||
| < 53 | 5 | 16 | 0.75 |
| ≥ 53 | 9 | 22 | |
| Clinical T stage | |||
| T2 | 1 | 2 | > 0.99 |
| T3 | 11 | 30 | |
| T4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Clinical N stage | |||
| N-positive | 11 | 36 | 0.11 |
| N-negative | 3 | 2 | |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| < 3 cycles | 3 | 5 | 0.66 |
| ≥ 3 cycles | 11 | 33 | |
| CEA, baseline (ng/mL) | |||
| < 4.4 | 2 | 24 | < 0.01 |
| ≥ 4.4 | 12 | 14 | |
| Hemoglobin, baseline (g/dL) | |||
| < 13.2 | 9 | 15 | 0.20 |
| ≥ 13.2 | 5 | 22 | |
| WBC count, baseline (×109/L) | |||
| < 7,300 | 2 | 16 | 0.07 |
| ≥ 7,300 | 10 | 19 | |
| Lymphocyte, baseline (%) | |||
| < 27.2 | 6 | 20 | 0.76 |
| ≥ 27.2 | 8 | 18 | |
| Lymphocyte count, baseline (×109/L) | |||
| < 1,996 | 8 | 18 | 0.76 |
| ≥ 1,996 | 6 | 20 | |
| Lymphocyte, at 4-week (%) | |||
| < 14.8 | 7 | 19 | > 0.99 |
| ≥ 14.8 | 7 | 19 | |
| Lymphocyte count, at 4-week (×109/L) | |||
| < 671 | 8 | 18 | 0.76 |
| ≥ 671 | 6 | 20 | |
| Sustaining lymphocyte ratio, at 4-week | |||
| < 0.35 | 2 | 22 | 0.01 |
| ≥ 0.35 | 12 | 16 | |
| Lymphocyte, at 8-week (%) | |||
| < 18.0 | 6 | 12 | 0.21 |
| ≥ 18.0 | 3 | 16 | |
| Lymphocyte count, at 8-week (×109/L) | |||
| < 903 | 7 | 18 | 0.69 |
| ≥ 903 | 2 | 10 | |
| Sustaining lymphocyte ratio, at 8-week | |||
| < 0.47 | 6 | 15 | 0.49 |
| ≥ 0.47 | 3 | 13 | |
| Lymphocyte, at 12-week (%) | |||
| < 19.3 | 5 | 12 | 0.86 |
| ≥ 19.2 | 4 | 11 | |
| Lymphocyte count, at 12-week (×109/L) | |||
| < 1,033 | 3 | 6 | 0.68 |
| ≥ 1,033 | 6 | 17 | |
| Sustaining lymphocyte ratio, at 12-week | |||
| < 0.53 | 4 | 11 | 0.86 |
| ≥ 0.53 | 5 | 12 | |
CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.
Chi-square test or Fisher exact test,
Analyses was done with available data at 8-week (n=37) and 12-week (n=32).
Multivariate analyses for predictors associated with a pathologic complete response
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| CEA < 4.4 ng/dL | 6.71 (1.22-36.97) | 0.03 |
| Sustained lymphocyte ratio ≥ 0.35 | 8.33 (1.54-45.12) | 0.02 |
| Clinical N stage | 0.22 (0.02-2.57) | 0.22 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.
Logistic regression with backward stepwise method was performed.
Radiotherapy planning–associated parameters
| Parameter | Median (range) |
|---|---|
| Radiation dose (Gy) | 50.0 (41.2-54.0) |
| Volume of PTV (mL) | 801 (556-1,266) |
| Sum of monitor unit | 378 (323-437) |
| Integral dose of body volume received > 5% of prescribed dose (L-Gy) | 20.6 (12.9-29.3) |
| Body volume received > 5% of prescribed dose (L) | 8.63 (4.84-11.93) |
PTV, planning target volume.
Fig. 2.Correlations between radiotherapy planning–associated parameters and the sustained lymphocyte ratio at 4 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. (A) Volume of planning target volume (PTV). (B) Sum of monitor unit (MU). (C) Body volume received more than 5% of prescribed dose. (D) Integral dose of body volume received more than 5% of prescribed dose.