Literature DB >> 25778831

Navigating through metaproteomics data: a logbook of database searching.

Thilo Muth1, Carolin A Kolmeder2, Jarkko Salojärvi2, Salla Keskitalo3, Markku Varjosalo3, Froukje J Verdam4, Sander S Rensen4, Udo Reichl1,5, Willem M de Vos2,6,7, Erdmann Rapp1, Lennart Martens8,9.   

Abstract

Metaproteomic research involves various computational challenges during the identification of fragmentation spectra acquired from the proteome of a complex microbiome. These issues are manifold and range from the construction of customized sequence databases, the optimal setting of search parameters to limitations in the identification search algorithms themselves. In order to assess the importance of these individual factors, we studied the effect of strategies to combine different search algorithms, explored the influence of chosen database search settings, and investigated the impact of the size of the protein sequence database used for identification. Furthermore, we applied de novo sequencing as a complementary approach to classic database searching. All evaluations were performed on a human intestinal metaproteome dataset. Pyrococcus furiosus proteome data were used to contrast database searching of metaproteomic data to a classic proteomic experiment. Searching against subsets of metaproteome databases and the use of multiple search engines increased the number of identifications. The integration of P. furiosus sequences in a metaproteomic sequence database showcased the limitation of the target-decoy-controlled false discovery rate approach in combination with large sequence databases. The selection of varying search engine parameters and the application of de novo sequencing represented useful methods to increase the reliability of the results. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for the data analysis that help researchers to establish or improve analysis workflows in metaproteomics.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; De novo sequencing; False discovery rate; Metaproteomics; Search parameters

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25778831     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  24 in total

1.  Posttranslational Protein Modifications in Plant Metabolism.

Authors:  Giulia Friso; Klaas J van Wijk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Multi-omics Comparative Analysis Reveals Multiple Layers of Host Signaling Pathway Regulation by the Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Natalia Shulzhenko; Arthur G Nuccio; Sara Azeem; Andrey Morgun; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.496

3.  A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane.

Authors:  Henning Schiebenhoefer; Kay Schallert; Bernhard Y Renard; Kathrin Trappe; Emanuel Schmid; Dirk Benndorf; Katharina Riedel; Thilo Muth; Stephan Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Progress and Challenges in Ocean Metaproteomics and Proposed Best Practices for Data Sharing.

Authors:  Mak A Saito; Erin M Bertrand; Megan E Duffy; David A Gaylord; Noelle A Held; William Judson Hervey; Robert L Hettich; Pratik D Jagtap; Michael G Janech; Danie B Kinkade; Dagmar H Leary; Matthew R McIlvin; Eli K Moore; Robert M Morris; Benjamin A Neely; Brook L Nunn; Jaclyn K Saunders; Adam I Shepherd; Nicholas I Symmonds; David A Walsh
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  The effect of microbial colonization on the host proteome varies by gastrointestinal location.

Authors:  Joshua S Lichtman; Emily Alsentzer; Mia Jaffe; Daniel Sprockett; Evan Masutani; Elvis Ikwa; Gabriela K Fragiadakis; David Clifford; Bevan Emma Huang; Justin L Sonnenburg; Kerwyn Casey Huang; Joshua E Elias
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 6.  High-resolution characterization of the human microbiome.

Authors:  Cecilia Noecker; Colin P McNally; Alexander Eng; Elhanan Borenstein
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 7.012

7.  A Metaproteomic Analysis of the Response of a Freshwater Microbial Community under Nutrient Enrichment.

Authors:  David A Russo; Narciso Couto; Andrew P Beckerman; Jagroop Pandhal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Comparative genomic, proteomic and exoproteomic analyses of three Pseudomonas strains reveals novel insights into the phosphorus scavenging capabilities of soil bacteria.

Authors:  Ian D E A Lidbury; Andrew R J Murphy; David J Scanlan; Gary D Bending; Alexandra M E Jones; Jonathan D Moore; Andrew Goodall; John P Hammond; Elizabeth M H Wellington
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  The impact of sequence database choice on metaproteomic results in gut microbiota studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Tanca; Antonio Palomba; Cristina Fraumene; Daniela Pagnozzi; Valeria Manghina; Massimo Deligios; Thilo Muth; Erdmann Rapp; Lennart Martens; Maria Filippa Addis; Sergio Uzzau
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  MetaPro-IQ: a universal metaproteomic approach to studying human and mouse gut microbiota.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Zhibin Ning; Janice Mayne; Jasmine I Moore; Jennifer Li; James Butcher; Shelley Ann Deeke; Rui Chen; Cheng-Kang Chiang; Ming Wen; David Mack; Alain Stintzi; Daniel Figeys
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.