Literature DB >> 25778285

Biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid) interpenetrating network hydrogel by intrastromal implantation in rabbit cornea.

Luo Luo Zheng1,2, Vijay Vanchinathan1, Roopa Dalal1, Jaan Noolandi1, Dale J Waters3, Laura Hartmann3, Jennifer R Cochran2, Curtis W Frank3, Charles Q Yu1, Christopher N Ta1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the biocompatibility of a poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid) (PEG/PAA) interpenetrating network hydrogel designed for artificial cornea in a rabbit model. PEG/PAA hydrogel measuring 6 mm in diameter was implanted in the corneal stroma of twelve rabbits. Stromal flaps were created with a microkeratome. Randomly, six rabbits were assigned to bear the implant for 2 months, two rabbits for 6 months, two rabbits for 9 months, one rabbit for 12 months, and one rabbit for 16 months. Rabbits were evaluated monthly. After the assigned period, eyes were enucleated, and corneas were processed for histology and immunohistochemistry. There were clear corneas in three of six rabbits that had implantation of hydrogel for 2 months. In the six rabbits with implant for 6 months or longer, the corneas remained clear in four. There was a high rate of epithelial defect and corneal thinning in these six rabbits. One planned 9-month rabbit developed extrusion of implant at 4 months. The cornea remained clear in the 16-month rabbit but histology revealed epithelial in-growth. Intrastromal implantation of PEG/PAA resulted in a high rate of long-term complications.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial cornea; biocompatibility; hydrogel; interpenetrating network; keratoprosthesis; poly(acrylic acid); poly(ethylene glycol)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25778285      PMCID: PMC4552592          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  39 in total

Review 1.  AlphaCor cases: comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Celia R Hicks; Geoffrey J Crawford; Donald T Tan; Grant R Snibson; Gerard L Sutton; Nicholas Downie; Tjahjono D Gondhowiardjo; Dennis S-C Lam; Liliana Werner; David Apple; Ian J Constable
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Designing materials for biology and medicine.

Authors:  Robert Langer; David A Tirrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Cardona keratoprosthesis: 40 years experience.

Authors:  H Cardona
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

4.  The soft keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  D R Caldwell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

5.  "Proplast" for keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  J H White; O Gona
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1988-05

Review 6.  Keratoprosthesis: past and present.

Authors:  J C Barber
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1988

7.  New Dacron tissue colonisable keratoprosthesis: clinical experience.

Authors:  S Pintucci; F Pintucci; M Cecconi; S Caiazza
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Melting after keratoprosthesis implantation: the effects of medroxyprogesterone.

Authors:  Celia R Hicks; Geoffrey J Crawford
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Deposits in artificial corneas: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Celia R Hicks; Traian V Chirila; Liliana Werner; Geoffrey J Crawford; David J Apple; Ian J Constable
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  The Dacron felt colonizable keratoprosthesis: after 15 years.

Authors:  S Pintucci; F Pintucci; S Caiazza; M Cecconi
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.922

View more
  6 in total

1.  An implanted pH sensor read using radiography.

Authors:  Md Arifuzzaman; Paul W Millhouse; Yash Raval; Thomas B Pace; Caleb J Behrend; Shayesteh Beladi Behbahani; John D DesJardins; Tzuen-Rong J Tzeng; Jeffrey N Anker
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 2.  Current Trends in Biomedical Hydrogels: From Traditional Crosslinking to Plasma-Assisted Synthesis.

Authors:  Kathrina Lois M Taaca; Eloise I Prieto; Magdaleno R Vasquez
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  The Human Tissue-Engineered Cornea (hTEC): Recent Progress.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Guérin; Gaëtan Le-Bel; Pascale Desjardins; Camille Couture; Elodie Gillard; Élodie Boisselier; Richard Bazin; Lucie Germain; Sylvain L Guérin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  pH-triggered degradation and release of doxorubicin from zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF8) decorated with polyacrylic acid.

Authors:  Vy Anh Tran; Sang-Wha Lee
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 5.  Bioengineering Approaches for Corneal Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  S Sharareh Mahdavi; Mohammad J Abdekhodaie; Shohreh Mashayekhan; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  Confocal and Histological Features After Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Corneal Inlay Implantation.

Authors:  Aritz Bidaguren; Javier Mendicute; Iratxe Madarieta; Nerea Garagorri
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.