S J Wallis1, J Wall2, R W S Biram3, R Romero-Ortuno4. 1. From the Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK and. 2. School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK and. 3. From the Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. 4. From the Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK, Clinical Gerontology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK roman.romero-ortuno@nhs.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical frailty scale (CFS) was validated as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people. In our hospital, the use of the CFS in emergency admissions of people aged ≥ 75 years was introduced under the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation payment framework. AIM: We retrospectively studied the association of the CFS with patient characteristics and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study in a large tertiary university National Health Service hospital in UK. METHODS: The CFS was correlated with transfer to specialist Geriatric ward, length of stay (LOS), in-patient mortality and 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: Between 1st August 2013 and 31st July 2014, there were 11 271 emergency admission episodes of people aged ≥ 75 years (all specialties), corresponding to 7532 unique patients (first admissions); of those, 5764 had the CFS measured by the admitting team (81% of them within 72 hr of admission). After adjustment for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index and history of dementia and/or current cognitive concern, the CFS was an independent predictor of in-patient mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 1.74, P < 0.001], transfer to Geriatric ward (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.42, P < 0.001) and LOS ≥ 10 days (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.23, P < 0.001). The CFS was not a multivariate predictor of 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The CFS may help predict in-patient mortality and target specialist geriatric resources within the hospital. Usual hospital metrics such as mortality and LOS should take into account measurable patient complexity.
BACKGROUND: The clinical frailty scale (CFS) was validated as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people. In our hospital, the use of the CFS in emergency admissions of people aged ≥ 75 years was introduced under the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation payment framework. AIM: We retrospectively studied the association of the CFS with patient characteristics and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study in a large tertiary university National Health Service hospital in UK. METHODS: The CFS was correlated with transfer to specialist Geriatric ward, length of stay (LOS), in-patient mortality and 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: Between 1st August 2013 and 31st July 2014, there were 11 271 emergency admission episodes of people aged ≥ 75 years (all specialties), corresponding to 7532 unique patients (first admissions); of those, 5764 had the CFS measured by the admitting team (81% of them within 72 hr of admission). After adjustment for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index and history of dementia and/or current cognitive concern, the CFS was an independent predictor of in-patient mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 1.74, P < 0.001], transfer to Geriatric ward (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.42, P < 0.001) and LOS ≥ 10 days (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.23, P < 0.001). The CFS was not a multivariate predictor of 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The CFS may help predict in-patient mortality and target specialist geriatric resources within the hospital. Usual hospital metrics such as mortality and LOS should take into account measurable patient complexity.
Authors: I Aprahamian; G V Aricó de Almeida; C F de Vasconcellos Romanin; T Gomes Caldas; N T Antunes Yoshitake; L Bataglini; S Mori Lin; A Alves Pereira; L Nara Alegrini Longhi; R L Mamoni; J E Martinelli Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Simon J G Richards; Frank A Frizelle; John A Geddes; Tim W Eglinton; Mark B Hampton Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: A Hajek; C Brettschneider; T Posselt; C Lange; S Mamone; B Wiese; S Weyerer; J Werle; A Fuchs; M Pentzek; J Stein; T Luck; H Bickel; E Mösch; K Heser; F Jessen; W Maier; M Scherer; S G Riedel-Heller; H-H König Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Rupen Shah; Jeffrey D Borrebach; Jacob C Hodges; Patrick R Varley; Mary Kay Wisniewski; Myrick C Shinall; Shipra Arya; Jonas Johnson; Joel B Nelson; Ada Youk; Nader N Massarweh; Jason M Johanning; Daniel E Hall Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joe Hollinghurst; Gemma Housley; Alan Watkins; Andrew Clegg; Thomas Gilbert; Simon P Conroy Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 10.668