Literature DB >> 25775564

Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.

Tianyin Zhou1, Ning Shen2, Lin Yang1, Namiko Abe3, John Horton4, Richard S Mann5, Harmen J Bussemaker6, Raluca Gordân7, Remo Rohs8.   

Abstract

DNA binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) are a key component of gene regulatory processes. Underlying mechanisms that explain the highly specific binding of TFs to their genomic target sites are poorly understood. A better understanding of TF-DNA binding requires the ability to quantitatively model TF binding to accessible DNA as its basic step, before additional in vivo components can be considered. Traditionally, these models were built based on nucleotide sequence. Here, we integrated 3D DNA shape information derived with a high-throughput approach into the modeling of TF binding specificities. Using support vector regression, we trained quantitative models of TF binding specificity based on protein binding microarray (PBM) data for 68 mammalian TFs. The evaluation of our models included cross-validation on specific PBM array designs, testing across different PBM array designs, and using PBM-trained models to predict relative binding affinities derived from in vitro selection combined with deep sequencing (SELEX-seq). Our results showed that shape-augmented models compared favorably to sequence-based models. Although both k-mer and DNA shape features can encode interdependencies between nucleotide positions of the binding site, using DNA shape features reduced the dimensionality of the feature space. In addition, analyzing the feature weights of DNA shape-augmented models uncovered TF family-specific structural readout mechanisms that were not revealed by the DNA sequence. As such, this work combines knowledge from structural biology and genomics, and suggests a new path toward understanding TF binding and genome function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA structure; protein binding microarray; protein−DNA recognition; statistical machine learning; support vector regression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25775564      PMCID: PMC4403198          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422023112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

Review 1.  DNA binding sites: representation and discovery.

Authors:  G D Stormo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Determining the specificity of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Gary D Stormo; Yue Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Compact, universal DNA microarrays to comprehensively determine transcription-factor binding site specificities.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Anthony A Philippakis; Aaron M Qureshi; Fangxue S He; Preston W Estep; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-24       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Tianyin Zhou; Lin Yang; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Raluca Gordân; Remo Rohs
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.

Authors:  Phaedra Agius; Aaron Arvey; William Chang; William Stafford Noble; Christina Leslie
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity.

Authors:  Matthew T Weirauch; Atina Cote; Raquel Norel; Matti Annala; Yue Zhao; Todd R Riley; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Thomas Cokelaer; Anastasia Vedenko; Shaheynoor Talukder; Harmen J Bussemaker; Quaid D Morris; Martha L Bulyk; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Massively parallel in vivo enhancer assay reveals that highly local features determine the cis-regulatory function of ChIP-seq peaks.

Authors:  Michael A White; Connie A Myers; Joseph C Corbo; Barak A Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Stability selection for regression-based models of transcription factor-DNA binding specificity.

Authors:  Fantine Mordelet; John Horton; Alexander J Hartemink; Barbara E Engelhardt; Raluca Gordân
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Sequence-similar, structure-dissimilar protein pairs in the PDB.

Authors:  Mickey Kosloff; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01
View more
  98 in total

1.  Using competition assays to quantitatively model cooperative binding by transcription factors and other ligands.

Authors:  Jacob Peacock; James B Jaynes
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.770

2.  Plasticity in Repressor-DNA Interactions Neutralizes Loss of Symmetry in Bipartite Operators.

Authors:  Deepti Jain; Naveen Narayanan; Deepak T Nair
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Quantum annealing versus classical machine learning applied to a simplified computational biology problem.

Authors:  Richard Y Li; Rosa Di Felice; Remo Rohs; Daniel A Lidar
Journal:  npj Quantum Inf       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 7.385

4.  Exposing the secrets of sex determination.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Lin Yang
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Shapely DNA attracts the right partner.

Authors:  Teresa M Przytycka; David Levens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Co-SELECT reveals sequence non-specific contribution of DNA shape to transcription factor binding in vitro.

Authors:  Soumitra Pal; Jan Hoinka; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Decoding the non-coding genome: elucidating genetic risk outside the coding genome.

Authors:  C L Barr; V L Misener
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  Experimental maps of DNA structure at nucleotide resolution distinguish intrinsic from protein-induced DNA deformations.

Authors:  Robert N Azad; Dana Zafiropoulos; Douglas Ober; Yining Jiang; Tsu-Pei Chiu; Jared M Sagendorf; Remo Rohs; Thomas D Tullius
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Prediction of regulatory motifs from human Chip-sequencing data using a deep learning framework.

Authors:  Jinyu Yang; Anjun Ma; Adam D Hoppe; Cankun Wang; Yang Li; Chi Zhang; Yan Wang; Bingqiang Liu; Qin Ma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  AptaTRACE Elucidates RNA Sequence-Structure Motifs from Selection Trends in HT-SELEX Experiments.

Authors:  Phuong Dao; Jan Hoinka; Mayumi Takahashi; Jiehua Zhou; Michelle Ho; Yijie Wang; Fabrizio Costa; John J Rossi; Rolf Backofen; John Burnett; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.