OBJECTIVE: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath as measured by electronic nose (e-nose) have utility as biomarkers to detect subjects at risk of having lung cancer in a screening setting. We hypothesize that breath analysis using an e-nose chemo-resistive sensor array could be used as a screening tool to discriminate patients diagnosed with lung cancer from high-risk smokers. METHODS: Breath samples from 191 subjects-25 lung cancer patients and 166 high-risk smoker control subjects without cancer-were analyzed. For clinical relevancy, subjects in both groups were matched for age, sex, and smoking histories. Classification and regression trees and discriminant functions classifiers were used to recognize VOC patterns in e-nose data. Cross-validated results were used to assess classification accuracy. Repeatability and reproducibility of e-nose data were assessed by measuring subject-exhaled breath in parallel across two e-nose devices. RESULTS: e-Nose measurements could distinguish lung cancer patients from high-risk control subjects, with a better than 80% classification accuracy. Subject sex and smoking status impacted classification as area under the curve results (ex-smoker males 0.846, ex-smoker female 0.816, current smoker male 0.745, and current smoker female 0.725) demonstrated. Two e-nose systems could be calibrated to give equivalent readings across subject-exhaled breath measured in parallel. CONCLUSIONS: e-Nose technology may have significant utility as a noninvasive screening tool for detecting individuals at increased risk for lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: The results presented further the case that VOC patterns could have real clinical utility to screen for lung cancer in the important growing ex-smoker population.
OBJECTIVE: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath as measured by electronic nose (e-nose) have utility as biomarkers to detect subjects at risk of having lung cancer in a screening setting. We hypothesize that breath analysis using an e-nose chemo-resistive sensor array could be used as a screening tool to discriminate patients diagnosed with lung cancer from high-risk smokers. METHODS: Breath samples from 191 subjects-25 lung cancerpatients and 166 high-risk smoker control subjects without cancer-were analyzed. For clinical relevancy, subjects in both groups were matched for age, sex, and smoking histories. Classification and regression trees and discriminant functions classifiers were used to recognize VOC patterns in e-nose data. Cross-validated results were used to assess classification accuracy. Repeatability and reproducibility of e-nose data were assessed by measuring subject-exhaled breath in parallel across two e-nose devices. RESULTS: e-Nose measurements could distinguish lung cancerpatients from high-risk control subjects, with a better than 80% classification accuracy. Subject sex and smoking status impacted classification as area under the curve results (ex-smoker males 0.846, ex-smoker female 0.816, current smoker male 0.745, and current smoker female 0.725) demonstrated. Two e-nose systems could be calibrated to give equivalent readings across subject-exhaled breath measured in parallel. CONCLUSIONS: e-Nose technology may have significant utility as a noninvasive screening tool for detecting individuals at increased risk for lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: The results presented further the case that VOC patterns could have real clinical utility to screen for lung cancer in the important growing ex-smoker population.
Authors: Wadah Ibrahim; Liesl Carr; Rebecca Cordell; Michael J Wilde; Dahlia Salman; Paul S Monks; Paul Thomas; Chris E Brightling; Salman Siddiqui; Neil J Greening Journal: Thorax Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Hanaa Shafiek; Federico Fiorentino; Jose Luis Merino; Carla López; Antonio Oliver; Jaume Segura; Ivan de Paul; Oriol Sibila; Alvar Agustí; Borja G Cosío Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-09-17
Authors: Agne Krilaviciute; Jonathan Alexander Heiss; Marcis Leja; Juozas Kupcinskas; Hossam Haick; Hermann Brenner Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-11-17
Authors: Bohan Xu; Mahdi Moradi; Rayus Kuplicki; Jennifer L Stewart; Brett McKinney; Sandip Sen; Martin P Paulus Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.157