Literature DB >> 25775482

Sex and Smoking Status Effects on the Early Detection of Early Lung Cancer in High-Risk Smokers Using an Electronic Nose.

Annette McWilliams, Parmida Beigi, Akhila Srinidhi, Stephen Lam, Calum E MacAulay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath as measured by electronic nose (e-nose) have utility as biomarkers to detect subjects at risk of having lung cancer in a screening setting. We hypothesize that breath analysis using an e-nose chemo-resistive sensor array could be used as a screening tool to discriminate patients diagnosed with lung cancer from high-risk smokers.
METHODS: Breath samples from 191 subjects-25 lung cancer patients and 166 high-risk smoker control subjects without cancer-were analyzed. For clinical relevancy, subjects in both groups were matched for age, sex, and smoking histories. Classification and regression trees and discriminant functions classifiers were used to recognize VOC patterns in e-nose data. Cross-validated results were used to assess classification accuracy. Repeatability and reproducibility of e-nose data were assessed by measuring subject-exhaled breath in parallel across two e-nose devices.
RESULTS: e-Nose measurements could distinguish lung cancer patients from high-risk control subjects, with a better than 80% classification accuracy. Subject sex and smoking status impacted classification as area under the curve results (ex-smoker males 0.846, ex-smoker female 0.816, current smoker male 0.745, and current smoker female 0.725) demonstrated. Two e-nose systems could be calibrated to give equivalent readings across subject-exhaled breath measured in parallel.
CONCLUSIONS: e-Nose technology may have significant utility as a noninvasive screening tool for detecting individuals at increased risk for lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: The results presented further the case that VOC patterns could have real clinical utility to screen for lung cancer in the important growing ex-smoker population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25775482     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2409092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  12 in total

Review 1.  Breathomics for the clinician: the use of volatile organic compounds in respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Wadah Ibrahim; Liesl Carr; Rebecca Cordell; Michael J Wilde; Dahlia Salman; Paul S Monks; Paul Thomas; Chris E Brightling; Salman Siddiqui; Neil J Greening
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Using the Electronic Nose to Identify Airway Infection during COPD Exacerbations.

Authors:  Hanaa Shafiek; Federico Fiorentino; Jose Luis Merino; Carla López; Antonio Oliver; Jaume Segura; Ivan de Paul; Oriol Sibila; Alvar Agustí; Borja G Cosío
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of age and gender on the profile of exhaled volatile organic compounds analyzed by an electronic nose.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta; Pierluigi Carratu; Teresa Ranieri; Onofrio Resta
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 4.  Exhaled breath analysis for the early detection of lung cancer: recent developments and future prospects.

Authors:  Inbar Nardi-Agmon; Nir Peled
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-05-17

Review 5.  Electronic Nose as a Novel Method for Diagnosing Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chiara Baldini; Lucia Billeci; Francesco Sansone; Raffaele Conte; Claudio Domenici; Alessandro Tonacci
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25

Review 6.  The electronic nose technology in clinical diagnosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mariana Valente Farraia; João Cavaleiro Rufo; Inês Paciência; Francisca Mendes; Luís Delgado; André Moreira
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2019-07-22

Review 7.  Potential of the Electronic Nose for the Detection of Respiratory Diseases with and without Infection.

Authors:  Johann-Christoph Licht; Hartmut Grasemann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology.

Authors:  I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 9.  Detection of cancer through exhaled breath: a systematic review.

Authors:  Agne Krilaviciute; Jonathan Alexander Heiss; Marcis Leja; Juozas Kupcinskas; Hossam Haick; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  Machine Learning Analysis of Electronic Nose in a Transdiagnostic Community Sample With a Streamlined Data Collection Approach: No Links Between Volatile Organic Compounds and Psychiatric Symptoms.

Authors:  Bohan Xu; Mahdi Moradi; Rayus Kuplicki; Jennifer L Stewart; Brett McKinney; Sandip Sen; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.