| Literature DB >> 25775457 |
Ronald E Blanton1, Lúcio M Barbosa2, Eliana A Reis3, Theomira M Carmo3, Cláudio R A Dos Santos3, Jackson M Costa3, Peace T Aminu1, Walter A Blank1, Renato Barbosa Reis4, Isabel C Guimarães5, Luciano K Silva3, Mitermayer G Reis6.
Abstract
Urbanization is increasing across the globe, and diseases once considered rural can now be found in urban areas due to the migration of populations from rural endemic areas, local transmission within the city, or a combination of factors. We investigated the epidemiologic characteristics of urban immigrants and natives living in a neighborhood of Salvador, Brazil where there is a focus of transmission of Schistosoma mansoni. In a cross-sectional study, all inhabitants from 3 sections of the community were interviewed and examined. In order to determine the degree of parasite differentiation between immigrants and the native born, S. mansoni eggs from stools were genotyped for 15 microsatellite markers. The area received migrants from all over the state, but most infected children had never been outside of the city, and infected snails were present at water contact sites. Other epidemiologic features suggested immigration contributed little to the presence of infection. The intensity and prevalence of infection were the same for immigrants and natives when adjusted for age, and length of immigrant residence in the community was positively associated with prevalence of infection. The population structure of the parasites also supported that the contribution from immigration was small, since the host-to-host differentiation was no greater in the urban parasite population than a rural population with little distant immigration, and there had been little differentiation in the urban population over the past 7 years. Public health efforts should focus on eliminating local transmission, and once eliminated, reintroduction from distant migration is unlikely.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25775457 PMCID: PMC4361398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Distribution of schistosomiasis in Salvador and the neighborhood of São Bartolomeu.
A. Distribution of mean annual S. mansoni-positive fecal examinations in Salvador by neighborhood 2000–2006. No information was available for blank areas. Source: Salvador Municipal Secretariate of Health (http://www.tabnet.saude.salvador.ba.gov.br). B. Map of São Bartolomeu showing homes in the 3 microareas (MA) and rivers running through the community as well as streets in surrounding neighborhoods. Water contact sites: 1. Reservoir dam; 2. Gardens; 3. Gardens entrance; 4. Fountain Street; 5. Iron Bridge; 6. São Rafael Passageway; 7. Swamp beside soccer field; 8. Manguete and Snake Streets. Sites 1, 2 and 5 were significantly associated with infection.
Fig 2Schematic diagram of population comparisons for differentiation.
Di—Small circles represent infrapopulations infecting a single host. The individuals in the infrapopulations are heterogeneous, but they are all represented by a single color, their average allele frequency. Each line is a discrete value for the pairwise Jost’s D between infrapopulations. The Di’s of infrapopulations from a group of hosts are summarized by the average. Dc—Large circles represent component populations made up of all the parasites in an area or a group of hosts with the same epidemiologic characteristic. The Dc is calculated from the combined allele numbers for all members of the component population compared to the allele numbers from the comparison group. From a comparison of the 2 groups, a single value for Jost’s D is calculated. Dic—This compares the allele frequencies of individual infrapopulations to the combined allele frequency of their source component populations. Each infrapopulation will be characterized by a single value for Jost’s D that represents its relative similarity to the component population. The Dic’s of infrapopulations from a group of hosts are summarized by their average.
General characteristics of the studied population in São Bartolomeu.
| Total | MA1 | MA3 | MA6 | pMA1,3,6
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| n = 1228 | n = 439 | n = 335 | n = 447 | ||
|
| Prevalence (%) | 300 (24.7) | 101 (23.1) | 81 (24.3) | 118 (26.5) | 0.51 |
| Intensity | 60.8 (4.6) | 50.3 (3.0) | 69.7 (5.0) | 64.9 (4.9) | 0.27 | |
|
| 554 (45.1) | 187 (42.6) | 157 (46.9) | 206 (46.1) | 0.43 | |
|
| 29.2±17.8 | 28.6±18.0 | 29.0±17.5 | 29.8±17.7 | 0.43 | |
|
| Salvador | 946 (77.6) | 355 (81.2) | 232 (69.3) | 359 (80.3) |
|
|
| 90.7 (20.2) | 92.1 (18.9) | 87.7 (22.0) | 91.6 (19.7) | 0.01 | |
|
| 1080 (92.5) | 394 (94.7) | 309 (92.8) | 377 (90.2) | 0.89 | |
|
| Indoor Toilet | 1029 (95.9) | 386 (98.7) | 294 (96.4) | 349 (92.6) |
|
| Septic tank/ Sewer | 711 (67.2) | 303 (78.9) | 167 (56.2) | 241 (63.9) |
| |
| River/Open air | 347 (32.8) | 81 (21.1) | 130 (43.8) | 136 (36.1) | ||
|
| 601 (49.4) | 170 (39.0) | 224 (67.1) | 207 (46.4) |
|
apMA—the p-value by chi-squared analysis for the comparison of the subscripted microareas.
bSignificance for 2X3 table.
cGeometric mean egg counts per gram of feces
Bold type indicates significant p values after Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.
Fig 3Geometric mean intensity and prevalence of S. mansoni infection in 5 year intervals.
Mean intensity was calculated only for those who were egg positive.
Risk factors for S. mansoni egg positive stools.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 554 | 199 (66.3) |
| 2.47 (1.80–3.38) |
| Female | 671 | 101 (33.7) | - | - | |
|
| Yes | 540 | 89 (23.5) |
| 1.61 (1.17–2.21) |
| No | 488 | 154 (40.0) | - | - | |
|
| 0–9 | 1225 | 300 (26) |
| 1.28 (1.20–1.37) |
|
| 4–94 | 27 | 300 | 0.327 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) |
|
| 0–3 | 1225 | 76 (19.0) | 0.012 | 0.71 (0.54–1.91) |
|
| Yes | 274 | 50 (18) | 0.389 | 1.22 (0.78–0.78) |
| No | 951 | 250 (26) | - | - |
Variables were first tested for association or correlation with infection by univariate analysis and then significant variables were used in logistic regression analysis to identify those that were independently associated. Significant p values following Bonferroni correction are in bold.
Risk at contact points for S. mansoni infection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 210 (17.3) | 103 (48.4) |
| <0.001 |
|
| 245 (20.1) | 112 (45.5) |
| 0.001 |
|
| 270 (22.2) | 107 (39.5) | 0.71 (0.44–1.16 | 0.168 |
|
| 308 (25.3) | 123 (39.8) | 1.16 (0.77–1.74) | 0.484 |
|
| 354 (29.1) | 153 (43.1) |
| <0.001 |
|
| 297 (24.4) | 96 (32.1) | 0.73 (0.50–1.07) | 0.103 |
|
| 370 (30.4) | 130 (34.8) |
| 0.004 |
|
| 237 (19.5) | 93 (39.1) | 1.14 (0.80–1.64) | 0.460 |
|
| 571 (47.0) | 165 (28.6) | 1.02 (0.77–1.37) | 0.875 |
1. Reservoir dam; 2. Gardens; 3. Gardens entrance; 4. Fountain Street; 5. Iron Bridge; 6. São Rafael Passageway; 7. Swamp beside soccer field; 8. Manguete and Snake Streets
Fig 4Kernel density analysis of the prevalence of S. mansoni infection in São Bartolomeu.
The spatial unit of reference is the home and each participant in the study was geo-referenced with their respective positive or negative parasitological result. Density analyses were generated with use of the Kernel density estimator implemented in the software ArcGIS spatial analyst extension 10.1. Density analyses were generated with bandwidth (search radius) of 50 meters. The location of Homes, the location and number of the human Population, the location and number of Infections and the Prevalence density (Infections/Population) are shown.
S. mansoni subpopulation differentiation and diversity.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Host sex (male vs female) | 0.003 | 0.053 vs 0.071 ( | 0.029 vs 0.039 (0.058) | 3.360 vs 3.305 (0.051) |
| Host age (≤15 vs >15 y/o) | 0.003 | 0.045 vs 0.063 | 0.024 vs 0.034 (0.018) | 3.329 vs 3.351 (0.341) | |
| Intensity of infection (<400 vs >400 epg*) | 0.001 | 0.065 vs 0.023 ( | 0.036 vs 0.012 ( | 3.308 vs 3.506 ( | |
| Contact point 1 (Yes vs no) | 0.002 | 0.051 vs 0.062 ( | 0.028 vs 0.034 (0.230) | 3.341 vs 3.347 (0.255) | |
| Contact point 2 (Yes vs no) | 0.002 | 0.043 vs 0.068 ( | 0.023 vs 0.038 ( | 3.339 vs 3.348 (0.197) | |
| Contact point 5 (Yes vs no) | 0.003 | 0.047 vs 0.070 ( | 0.026 vs 0.039 (0.008) | 3.362 vs 3.325 (0.038) | |
| MA1 vs MA3 | 0.005 | 0.069 vs 0.056 ( | 0.038 vs 0.030 (0.170) | 3.284 vs 3.400 (0.042) | |
| MA1 vs MA6 | 0.001 | 0.069 vs 0.042 ( | 0.038 vs 0.023 ( | 3.284 vs 3.390 (0.048) | |
| MA3 vs MA6 | 0.006 | 0.056 vs 0.042 ( | 0.030 vs 0.023 (0.140) | 3.400 vs 3.390 (0.791) | |
Parasite population differentiation in immigrant and native populations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Native | - | - | 0.058 | <0.001 | 0.031 | 0.038 | 3.016 | 0.99 |
| Immigrants | - | - | 0.108 | - | 0.059 | - | 3.012 | - | |
| Native vs Immigrants | 0.002 | 0.001–0.004 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
|
| Native | - | - | 0.124 | 0.082 | 0.068 | 0.416 | 3.351 | 0.96 |
| Immigrants | - | - | 0.128 | - | 0.074 | - | 3.349 | - | |
| Native vs Immigrants | 0.022 | 0.017–0.026 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dc—Jost's D for the component population composed of all members of the group. Di—mean pairwise Jost's D between infrapopulations for all members of the group. Dic—mean Jost's D for each infrapopulation in the group compared to the community component population. AE—mean effective allele number. CI 95% determined with 1000 bootstrap replications using the program SPADE. Student's t-test was used to compare group means for these indices.