Literature DB >> 25774889

Towards a dosimetric framework for therapeutic ultrasound.

Adam Shaw1, Gail ter Haar, Julian Haller, Volker Wilkens.   

Abstract

There is a need for a coherent set of exposure and dose quantities to describe ultrasound fields in media other than water (including tissue and tissue-simulating materials). This paper proposes an outline dosimetry scheme, with quantities for free field exposure, in situ exposure, dose (both instantaneous and cumulative) and effect, to act as a structure for organising a more complete set of definitions. It also presents findings from a survey of the views of the therapeutic ultrasound community which generally supports the principle of using modified free field quantities to describe the in situ field, and the prioritising of dose quantities which are related to heating and thermal mechanisms. Although there is no one-to-one relationship between any known ultrasound dose quantity and a specific biological effect, this can also be said of radiotherapy and other modalities where weighting factors have been developed to calculate the degree of equivalence between different tissues and radiation types. This same separation is recommended for ultrasound, provided that an appropriate set of recognised 'engineering' quantities can be established for exposure and dose quantities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High intensity focused ultrasound; modelling; quality assurance; thermal ablation; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25774889     DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.997311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  8 in total

1.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Antitumor effects of combining tumor radiation with the antivascular action of ultrasound stimulated microbubbles.

Authors:  Yanlei Ji; Zhen Han; Limei Shao; Yuehuan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 3.  Thermal and mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound: perspectives on tumor ablation, immune effects and combination strategies.

Authors:  Renske J E van den Bijgaart; Dylan C Eikelenboom; Martijn Hoogenboom; Jurgen J Fütterer; Martijn H den Brok; Gosse J Adema
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Quantitative Assessments of Mechanical Responses upon Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Xiaodong Chen; Anyi Guo; Sijin Liu; Guoqing Hu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 16.806

5.  Simulation of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions in presence of boiling.

Authors:  Anthony Grisey; Sylvain Yon; Véronique Letort; Pauline Lafitte
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Equipment, measurement and dose-a survey for therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Adam Shaw; Eleanor Martin; Julian Haller; Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-03-02

7.  Volumetric Optoacoustic Temperature Mapping in Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Oyaga Landa; Xosé Luís Deán-Ben; Ronald Sroka; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A retrospective qualitative report of symptoms and safety from transcranial focused ultrasound for neuromodulation in humans.

Authors:  Wynn Legon; Sarah Adams; Priya Bansal; Parantap D Patel; Landon Hobbs; Leo Ai; Jerel K Mueller; Gregg Meekins; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.