Literature DB >> 25774102

Uncertainty analysis for absorption and first-derivative EPR spectra.

Mark Tseitlin1, Sandra S Eaton1, Gareth R Eaton1.   

Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experimental techniques produce absorption or first-derivative spectra. Uncertainty analysis provides the basis for comparison of spectra obtained by different methods. In this study it was used to derive analytical equations to relate uncertainties for integrated intensity and line widths obtained from absorption or first-derivative spectra to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with the assumption of white noise. Predicted uncertainties for integrated intensities and line widths are in good agreement with Monte Carlo calculations for Lorentzian and Gaussian lineshapes. Conservative low-pass filtering changes the noise spectrum, which can be modeled in the Monte Carlo simulations. When noise is close to white, the analytical equations provide useful estimates of uncertainties. For example, for a Lorentzian line with white noise, the uncertainty in the number of spins obtained from the first-derivative spectrum is 2.6 times greater than from the absorption spectrum at the same SNR. Uncertainties in line widths obtained from absorption and first-derivative spectra are similar. The impact of integration or differentiation on SNR and on uncertainties in fitting parameters was analyzed. Although integration of the first-derivative spectrum improves the apparent smoothness of the spectrum, it also changes the frequency distribution of the noise. If the lineshape of the signal is known, the integrated intensity can be determined more accurately by fitting the first-derivative spectrum than by first integrating and then fitting the absorption spectrum. Uncertainties in integrated intensities and line widths are less when the parameters are determined from the original data than from spectra that have been either integrated or differentiated.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 25774102      PMCID: PMC4357019          DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.21248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res        ISSN: 1546-6086            Impact factor:   0.481


  5 in total

1.  X-band rapid-scan EPR of nitroxyl radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Evaluating the third and fourth derivatives of spectral data.

Authors:  Y Leong Yeow; Safura Azali; S Yen Ow; May C L Wong; Yee-Kwong Leong
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Eugene D Barth; Colin Mailer; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Deconvolution of sinusoidal rapid EPR scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Rapid-scan EPR with triangular scans and fourier deconvolution to recover the slow-scan spectrum.

Authors:  Janhavi P Joshi; John R Ballard; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.229

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Rapid-Scan EPR of Nitroxide Spin Labels and Semiquinones.

Authors:  Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  The Functional Amyloid Orb2A Binds to Lipid Membranes.

Authors:  Maria A Soria; Silvia A Cervantes; Thalia H Bajakian; Ansgar B Siemer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Multiharmonic electron paramagnetic resonance for extended samples with both narrow and broad lines.

Authors:  Zhelin Yu; Mark Tseytlin; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Rapid-scan EPR imaging.

Authors:  Sandra S Eaton; Yilin Shi; Lukas Woodcock; Laura A Buchanan; Joseph McPeak; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Imaging of nitroxides at 250MHz using rapid-scan electron paramagnetic resonance.

Authors:  Joshua R Biller; Mark Tseitlin; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Hilary A Weismiller; Hanan Elajaili; Gerald M Rosen; Joseph P Y Kao; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Use of rapid-scan EPR to improve detection sensitivity for spin-trapped radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Gerald M Rosen; Mark Tseitlin; Breanna Symmes; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  New spectral-spatial imaging algorithm for full EPR spectra of multiline nitroxides and pH sensitive trityl radicals.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Joshua R Biller; Hanan Elajaili; Valery V Khramtsov; Ilirian Dhimitruka; Gareth R Eaton; Sandra S Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Rapid-scan EPR of immobilized nitroxides.

Authors:  Zhelin Yu; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Mark Tseitlin; Hanan Elajaili; Velavan Kathirvelu; Laura J Clouston; Przemysław J Boratyński; Andrzej Rajca; Richard Stein; Hassane Mchaourab; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Rapid scan electron paramagnetic resonance at 1.0 GHz of defect centers in γ-irradiated organic solids.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.898

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.