Literature DB >> 25774003

Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.

Susanne Tewes1, Katja Hueper2, Dagmar Hartung2, Florian Imkamp3, Thomas R W Herrmann3, Juergen Weidemann2, Stefan Renckly3, Markus A Kuczyk3, Frank Wacker2, Inga Peters3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel system for MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with previous negative prostate biopsy and determine diagnostic accuracy when using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) as proposed by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.
METHODS: Thirty-nine men with clinical suspicion of PCa and history of previous prostate biopsy underwent mpMRI on a 3-T MRI. In total, 72 lesions were evaluated by the consensus of two radiologists. PI-RADS scores for each MRI sequence, the sum of the PI-RADS scores and the global PI-RADS were determined. MRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted biopsy was performed using the BioJet™ software combined with a transrectal ultrasound system. Image fusion was based on rigid registration. PI-RADS scores of the dominant lesion were compared with histopathological results. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy was reliable and successful for 71 out of 72 lesions. The global PI-RADS score of the dominant lesion was significantly higher in patients with PCa (4.0 ± 1.3) compared to patients with negative histopathology (2.6 ± 0.8; p = 0.0006). Using a global PI-RADS score cut-off ≥4, a sensitivity of 85 %, a specificity of 82 % and a negative predictive value of 92 % were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: The described fusion system is dependable and efficient for targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy. mpMRI PI-RADS scores combined with a novel real-time MRI/TRUS fusion system facilitate sufficient diagnosis of PCa with high sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy; Multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS scoring; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25774003     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1525-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

1.  Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.

Authors:  L Schimmöller; M Quentin; C Arsov; R S Lanzman; A Hiester; R Rabenalt; G Antoch; P Albers; D Blondin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  M C Roethke; T H Kuru; S Schultze; D Tichy; A Kopp-Schneider; M Fenchel; H-P Schlemmer; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.

Authors:  Claartje Gosselaar; Monique J Roobol; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Tineke Wolters; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  C G Roehrborn; G J Pickens; J S Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway?

Authors:  Louise Dickinson; Hashim U Ahmed; Clare Allen; Jelle O Barentsz; Brendan Carey; Jurgen J Futterer; Stijn W Heijmink; Peter Hoskin; Alex P Kirkham; Anwar R Padhani; Raj Persad; Philippe Puech; Shonit Punwani; Aslam Sohaib; Bertrand Tombal; Arnauld Villers; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.

Authors:  Maarten de Rooij; Simone Crienen; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Maroeska M Rovers; Janneke P C Grutters
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  16 in total

1.  Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: A multireader study.

Authors:  Matthew D Greer; Anna M Brown; Joanna H Shih; Ronald M Summers; Jamie Marko; Yan Mee Law; Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy : Value in the context of focal therapy].

Authors:  T Franz; J von Hardenberg; A Blana; H Cash; D Baumunk; G Salomon; B Hadaschik; T Henkel; J Herrmann; F Kahmann; K-U Köhrmann; J Köllermann; S Kruck; U-B Liehr; S Machtens; I Peters; J P Radtke; A Roosen; H-P Schlemmer; L Sentker; J J Wendler; U Witzsch; J-U Stolzenburg; M Schostak; R Ganzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Evaluation of the 'Prostate Interdisciplinary Communication and Mapping Algorithm for Biopsy and Pathology' (PIC-MABP).

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Thomas R W Herrmann; Markus Bader; Jasmin Bektic; Gregor Henkel; Stephan Kruck; Markus Sandbichler; David Schilling; Georg Schäfer; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer?

Authors:  Samuel A Gold; Graham R Hale; Jonathan B Bloom; Clayton P Smith; Kareem N Rayn; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Why Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Miss Clinically Significant Cancer?

Authors:  Cheyenne Williams; Michael Ahdoot; Michael A Daneshvar; Christian Hague; Andrew R Wilbur; Patrick T Gomella; Joanna Shih; Nabila Khondakar; Nitin Yerram; Sherif Mehralivand; Sandeep Gurram; Minhaj Siddiqui; Paul Pinsky; Howard Parnes; Maria Merino; Bradford Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Francesco Barletta; Elio Mazzone; Armando Stabile; Simone Scuderi; Giorgio Brembilla; Mario de Angelis; Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli; Vito Cucchiara; Giorgio Gandaglia; R Jeffrey Karnes; Morgan Roupret; Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 9.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Neil Mendhiratta; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.