Literature DB >> 25772782

Receptive range analysis of a mouse odorant receptor subfamily.

Jingyi Li1, Rafi Haddad2, Vanessa Santos1, Selvan Bavan1, Charles W Luetje1.   

Abstract

Mammals deploy a large array of odorant receptors (ORs) to detect and distinguish a vast number of odorant molecules. ORs vary widely in the type of odorant structures recognized and in the breadth of molecular receptive range (MRR), with some ORs recognizing a small group of closely related molecules and other ORs recognizing a wide range of structures. While closely related ORs have been shown to have similar MRRs, the functional relationships among less closely related ORs are unclear. We screened a small group of ORs with a diverse odorant panel to identify a new odorant-OR pairing (unsaturated aldehydes and MOR263-3). We then extensively screened MOR263-3 and a series of additional MORs related to MOR263-3 in various ways. MORs related by phylogenetic analysis (several other members of the MOR263 subfamily) had MRRs that overlapped with the MRR of MOR263-3, even with amino acid identity as low as 48% (MOR263-2). MOR171-17, predicted to be functionally related to MOR263-3 by an alternative bioinformatic analysis, but with only 39% amino acid identity, had a distinct odorant specificity. Our results support the use of phylogenetic analysis to predict functional relationships among ORs with relatively low amino acid identity. We screened a small group of mouse odorant receptors (MORs) with a diverse odorant panel to identify a new odorant-OR pairing (unsaturated aldehydes and MOR263-3), then extensively screened a series of additional MORs related to MOR263-3 in various ways. MORs related by phylogenetic analysis had odorant specificities that overlapped with that of MOR263-3, but MOR171-17, predicted to be functionally related to MOR263-3 by an alternative bioinformatic analysis, had a distinct odorant specificity.
© 2015 International Society for Neurochemistry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xenopus oocytes; electrophysiology; heterologous expression; ligand specificity; molecular receptive range; olfactory receptors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772782      PMCID: PMC4472571          DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurochem        ISSN: 0022-3042            Impact factor:   5.372


  41 in total

1.  Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human-mouse comparisons.

Authors:  Orna Man; Yoav Gilad; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants.

Authors:  Yuki Oka; Masayo Omura; Hiroshi Kataoka; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  High-throughput microarray detection of olfactory receptor gene expression in the mouse.

Authors:  Xinmin Zhang; Matthew Rogers; Huikai Tian; Xiaohong Zhang; Dong-Jing Zou; Jian Liu; Minghong Ma; Gordon M Shepherd; Stuart J Firestein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors.

Authors:  Peter Mombaerts
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  A cyclic nucleotide-gated conductance in olfactory receptor cilia.

Authors:  T Nakamura; G H Gold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 29-Feb 4       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Odorant receptor expression defines functional units in the mouse olfactory system.

Authors:  Thomas Bozza; Paul Feinstein; Chen Zheng; Peter Mombaerts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The mouse olfactory receptor gene family.

Authors:  Paul A Godfrey; Bettina Malnic; Linda B Buck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A contextual model for axonal sorting into glomeruli in the mouse olfactory system.

Authors:  Paul Feinstein; Peter Mombaerts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  After the holy grail: establishing a molecular basis for Mammalian olfaction.

Authors:  Randall R Reed
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  High-affinity activators of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride conductance identified by high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Tonghui Ma; L Vetrivel; Hong Yang; Nicoletta Pedemonte; Olga Zegarra-Moran; Luis J V Galietta; A S Verkman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mammalian odorant receptor tuning breadth persists across distinct odorant panels.

Authors:  Devin Kepchia; Benjamin Sherman; Rafi Haddad; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Presence of recombination hotspots throughout SLC6A3.

Authors:  Juan Zhao; Yanhong Zhou; Nian Xiong; Hong Qing; Tao Wang; Zhicheng Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sequence-Based Prediction of Olfactory Receptor Responses.

Authors:  Shashank Chepurwar; Abhishek Gupta; Rafi Haddad; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.160

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.