Brian A Ference1, Faisal Majeed2, Raju Penumetcha3, John M Flack4, Robert D Brook5. 1. Division of Translational Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: bference@med.wayne.edu. 2. Division of Translational Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 4. Division of Translational Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. 5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considerable uncertainty exists as to whether lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibiting the Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) receptor with ezetimibe, either alone or in combination with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitor (statin), will reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of naturally random allocation to lower LDL-C mediated by polymorphisms in the NPC1L1 gene (target of ezetimibe), the HMGCR gene (target of statins), or both (target of combination therapy) on the risk of CHD. METHODS: We constructed NPC1L1 and HMGCR genetic LDL-C scores to naturally randomize participants into 4 groups: reference, lower LDL-C mediated by NPC1L1 polymorphisms, lower LDL-C mediated by HMGCR polymorphisms, or lower LDL-C mediated by polymorphisms in both NPC1L1 and HMGCR. We compared the risk of CHD (fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction) among each group using a 2 × 2 factorial mendelian randomization study design. RESULTS: A total of 108,376 persons (10,464 CHD events) from 14 studies were included. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the 4 groups, thus confirming that allocation was random. Compared to the reference group, the NPC1L1 group had 2.4 mg/dl lower LDL-C and 4.8% lower risk of CHD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.952, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.920 to 0.985); whereas the HMGCR group had 2.9 mg/dl lower LDL-C and a similar 5.3% lower risk of CHD (OR: 0.947, 95% CI: 0.909 to 0.986). The group with lower LDL-C mediated by both NPC1L1 and HMGCR polymorphisms had 5.8 mg/dl additively lower LDL-C and a 10.8% log-linearly additive lower risk of CHD (OR: 0.892, 95% CI: 0.854 to 0.932). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of lower LDL-C on the risk of CHD mediated by polymorphisms in NPC1L1, HMGCR, or both is approximately the same per unit lower LDL-C and log-linearly proportional to the absolute exposure to lower LDL-C.
BACKGROUND: Considerable uncertainty exists as to whether lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibiting the Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) receptor with ezetimibe, either alone or in combination with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitor (statin), will reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of naturally random allocation to lower LDL-C mediated by polymorphisms in the NPC1L1 gene (target of ezetimibe), the HMGCR gene (target of statins), or both (target of combination therapy) on the risk of CHD. METHODS: We constructed NPC1L1 and HMGCR genetic LDL-C scores to naturally randomize participants into 4 groups: reference, lower LDL-C mediated by NPC1L1 polymorphisms, lower LDL-C mediated by HMGCR polymorphisms, or lower LDL-C mediated by polymorphisms in both NPC1L1 and HMGCR. We compared the risk of CHD (fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction) among each group using a 2 × 2 factorial mendelian randomization study design. RESULTS: A total of 108,376 persons (10,464 CHD events) from 14 studies were included. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the 4 groups, thus confirming that allocation was random. Compared to the reference group, the NPC1L1 group had 2.4 mg/dl lower LDL-C and 4.8% lower risk of CHD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.952, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.920 to 0.985); whereas the HMGCR group had 2.9 mg/dl lower LDL-C and a similar 5.3% lower risk of CHD (OR: 0.947, 95% CI: 0.909 to 0.986). The group with lower LDL-C mediated by both NPC1L1 and HMGCR polymorphisms had 5.8 mg/dl additively lower LDL-C and a 10.8% log-linearly additive lower risk of CHD (OR: 0.892, 95% CI: 0.854 to 0.932). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of lower LDL-C on the risk of CHD mediated by polymorphisms in NPC1L1, HMGCR, or both is approximately the same per unit lower LDL-C and log-linearly proportional to the absolute exposure to lower LDL-C.
Authors: Margarita Garcia-Calvo; JeanMarie Lisnock; Herbert G Bull; Brian E Hawes; Duane A Burnett; Matthew P Braun; James H Crona; Harry R Davis; Dennis C Dean; Patricia A Detmers; Michael P Graziano; Meredith Hughes; D Euan Macintyre; Anthony Ogawa; Kim A O'neill; Sai Prasad N Iyer; Diane E Shevell; Marsha M Smith; Yui S Tang; Amanda M Makarewicz; Feroze Ujjainwalla; Scott W Altmann; Kevin T Chapman; Nancy A Thornberry Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-05-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Doralisa Morrone; William S Weintraub; Peter P Toth; Mary E Hanson; Robert S Lowe; Jianxin Lin; Arvind K Shah; Andrew M Tershakovec Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Sekar Kathiresan; Olle Melander; Candace Guiducci; Aarti Surti; Noël P Burtt; Mark J Rieder; Gregory M Cooper; Charlotta Roos; Benjamin F Voight; Aki S Havulinna; Björn Wahlstrand; Thomas Hedner; Dolores Corella; E Shyong Tai; Jose M Ordovas; Göran Berglund; Erkki Vartiainen; Pekka Jousilahti; Bo Hedblad; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Veikko Salomaa; Leena Peltonen; Leif Groop; David M Altshuler; Marju Orho-Melander Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-01-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; Robert P Giugliano; Michael A Blazing; Robert A Harrington; John L Peterson; Christine McCrary Sisk; John Strony; Thomas A Musliner; Carolyn H McCabe; Enrico Veltri; Eugene Braunwald; Robert M Califf Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nathan O Stitziel; Hong-Hee Won; Alanna C Morrison; Gina M Peloso; Ron Do; Leslie A Lange; Pierre Fontanillas; Namrata Gupta; Stefano Duga; Anuj Goel; Martin Farrall; Danish Saleheen; Paola Ferrario; Inke König; Rosanna Asselta; Piera A Merlini; Nicola Marziliano; Maria Francesca Notarangelo; Ursula Schick; Paul Auer; Themistocles L Assimes; Muredach Reilly; Robert Wilensky; Daniel J Rader; G Kees Hovingh; Thomas Meitinger; Thorsten Kessler; Adnan Kastrati; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; David Siscovick; Jerome I Rotter; Stanely L Hazen; Russell Tracy; Sharon Cresci; John Spertus; Rebecca Jackson; Stephen M Schwartz; Pradeep Natarajan; Jacy Crosby; Donna Muzny; Christie Ballantyne; Stephen S Rich; Christopher J O'Donnell; Goncalo Abecasis; Shamil Sunaev; Deborah A Nickerson; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman; Erin Austin; Iftikhar J Kullo; Peter E Weeke; Christian M Shaffer; Lisa A Bastarache; Joshua C Denny; Dan M Roden; Colin Palmer; Panos Deloukas; Dan-Yu Lin; Zheng-zheng Tang; Jeanette Erdmann; Heribert Schunkert; John Danesh; Jaume Marrugat; Roberto Elosua; Diego Ardissino; Ruth McPherson; Hugh Watkins; Alex P Reiner; James G Wilson; David Altshuler; Richard A Gibbs; Eric S Lander; Eric Boerwinkle; Stacey Gabriel; Sekar Kathiresan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Avinainder Singh; Bradley L Collins; Ankur Gupta; Amber Fatima; Arman Qamar; David Biery; Julio Baez; Mary Cawley; Josh Klein; Jon Hainer; Jorge Plutzky; Christopher P Cannon; Khurram Nasir; Marcelo F Di Carli; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer Sjaarda; Hertzel C Gerstein; Salim Yusuf; Darin Treleaven; Michael Walsh; Johannes F E Mann; Sibylle Hess; Guillaume Paré Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Xue-Qiao Zhao; Binh An P Phan; Joseph Davis; Daniel Isquith; Alice A Dowdy; Suzanne Boltz; Moni Neradilek; Erik A Monick; Andrew Brockenbrough; Ellen E Hus-Frechette; John J Albers; B Greg Brown Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 4.766