| Literature DB >> 25768021 |
Camila A Wilkens1, Ziomara P Gerdtzen1.
Abstract
Cell engineering has been used to improve animal cells' central carbon metabolism. Due to the central carbon metabolism's inefficiency and limiting input of carbons into the TCA cycle, key reactions belonging to these pathways have been targeted to improve cultures' performance. Previous works have shown the positive effects of overexpressing PYC2, MDH II and fructose transporter. Since each of these modifications was performed in different cell lines and culture conditions, no comparisons between these modifications can be made. In this work we aim at contrasting the effect of each of the modifications by comparing pools of transfected IgG producing CHO cells cultivated in batch cultures. Results of the culture performance of engineered clones indicate that even though all studied clones had a more efficient metabolism, not all of them showed the expected improvement on cell proliferation and/or specific productivity. CHO cells overexpressing PYC2 were able to improve their exponential growth rate but IgG synthesis was decreased, MDH II overexpression lead to a reduction in cell growth and protein production, and cells transfected with the fructose transporter gene were able to increase cell density and reach the same volumetric protein production as parental CHO cells in glucose. We propose that a redox unbalance caused by the new metabolic flux distribution could affect IgG assembly and protein secretion. In addition to reaction dynamics, thermodynamic aspects of metabolism are also discussed to further understand the effect of these modifications over central carbon metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25768021 PMCID: PMC4358941 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Batch cultures of different CHO cell engineered clones as a function of time.
Graphs to the left describe cultures that use glucose as the main carbon source and graphs to right depicts cultures that use fructose as their main carbon source. (●) CHO Glc control; (●) CHO PYC; (▼) CHO MDH; (♦) CHO Frc control; (♦) CHO FrcTr. A, B: Viable cells; C, D: main carbon source concentration; E, F: lactate concentration; G, H: glutamine concentration; I, J: IgG concentration.
Parameters for cell growth, ΔL/ΔH , IgG’s specific productivity and their percentage variation vs. their respective control cultures.
| Parental CHO cells Glc control | Parental CHO cells Frc control | CHO PYC | CHO FrcTr | CHO MDH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 62 | 23 | 70 | 62 | 50 |
| 12.9% | 0% | -19.4% | |||
|
| 1.65±0.07 | 1.62±0.03 | 1.76±0.25 | 2.35±0.16 | 1.72±0.25 |
| 6.7% | 42.4% | 4.2% | |||
|
| 1.042±0.15 | 0.629±0.14 | 0.79±0.12 | 0.653±0.07 | 0.559±0.08 |
| -24.2% | -37.3% | -46.4% | |||
|
| 2.30×10-4 | 3.79×10-4 | 1.08×10-4 | 1.99×10-4 | 1.71×10-5 |
| -53.0% | -13.5% | -92.6% |
aH stands for hexose, depending on the culture’s conditions it can be either glucose (G) or fructose (F).
Percentage variation for control cultures’ parameters compared to a parental cell culture
| CHO pcZeo | CHO PGK-Hygro | CHO pcHygro | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 8.3 | 4.2 | 8.3 |
|
| -2.3 | -11.6 | -9.3 |
|
| 18.7 | 17.4 | -11.4 |
Fig 2Impact of each of the modifications over CHO cells’ metabolism.
Reactions catalyzed by overexpressed enzymes are represented by bold lines. Glc: Glucose, Frc: Fructose, Cit: Citrate, AcCoA: Acetyl CoA, Mal: Malate, Oaa: Oxaloacetate, Asp: Aspartate, Pyr: Pyruvate, Lac: Lactate, αKG: α ketoglutarate, LDHa: Lactate Dehydrogenase a, PPP: Pentose Phosphate Pathway.
NAD+/NADH ratios of studied cultures
| Cell Cultures | NAD+/NADH |
|---|---|
| Parental CHO cells Glc control | 17.12±2.04 |
| Parental CHO cells Frc control | 4.19±1.05 |
| CHO PYC | 3.66±0.95 |
| CHO FrcTr | 3.64±0.71 |
| CHO MDH | 8.57±1.84 |
Standard Gibbs free-energies for studied reactions and their equilibrium constants
| Reaction | ΔG’0 [kJ mol-1] | K’eq |
|---|---|---|
| Pyr + CoA-SH + NAD+ → AcCoA + NADH + CO2 | -33.4 | 7×105
|
| Oaa + AcCoA + H2O → Cit + CoA-SH | -32.2 | 4×105
|
| Mal + NAD+ ↔ Oaa + NADH | 29.7 | 6×10–6
|
| Pyr + NADH ↔ Lac + NAD+ | -25.1 | 2×104
|
> Lower limit value