| Literature DB >> 25767469 |
Shreya Sharma1, Ritu Khosla1, Paul David1, Archana Rastogi2, Ashish Vyas1, Dileep Singh1, Ankit Bhardwaj3, Amrish Sahney3, Rakhi Maiwall3, Shiv Kumar Sarin3, Nirupma Trehanpati1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide and hepatitis B is one of the commonest causes. T regulatory cells (Tregs) are strong immunomodulators and are likely to play a major role in HCC development. HBV infection is reported to induce expansion of Tregs. We investigated the CD4+CD25+CD127(-ve)FoxP3+ Tregs in HBV-related HCC as compared to non-HBV-HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole blood immunophenotyping was analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry in patients with HBV-related HCC (HBV-HCC, n = 17), non-HBV-HCC (n = 22; NASH = 16, alcohol-related = 6), and chronic hepatitis B infection (CHBV; n = 10). Tregs functionality was checked by in vitro suppression assays using CD4+ CD25+ CD127(low) Tregs. Levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), expression of FoxP3, IL-10, PD1, TGF-β, and Notch in Tregs, and liver explants were analyzed by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative RT-PCR.Entities:
Keywords: T regulatory cells; alpha-fetoprotein; hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; transforming growth factor-β
Year: 2015 PMID: 25767469 PMCID: PMC4341117 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Oligo sequences used in the study for quantitative RT-PCR.
| S. no. | Gene | Oligo sequence |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IL-10 | 5′-CCGCCTCAGCCTCCCAAAGT-3′ |
| 5′-CCCTAACCTCATTCCCCAACCAC-3′ | ||
| 2 | TGF-β | 5′-GAGGCGCCCGGGTTATGCTGGTTG-3′ |
| 5′-CGCAAGGACCTCGGCTGGAAGTGG-3′ | ||
| 3 | CD25 | 5′-TGGACACACAAGGTGCAA-3′ |
| 5′-TGTGACCTCCATCCCTTCTC-3′ | ||
| 4 | FoxP3 | 5′-CACCTGGCTGGGAAAATGG-3′ |
| 5′-GGAGCCCTTGTCGGATGAT-3′ | ||
| 5 | Wnt 3a | 5′-CGCGAGTCGGCCTTCGTTCA-3′ |
| 5′-AGGCGGCCCCTTATGATGCG-3′ | ||
| 6 | Cyclin D1 | 5′-CTCCATCCAGGGATTCTTCA-3′ |
| 5′-TTTTTGGAGCTTCTGGCTGT-3′ | ||
| 7 | β-catenin | 5′-GACAGCAATCAGCTGGCCTGGT-3′ |
| 5′-ACCACTCCCACCCTACCAACCA-3′ | ||
| 8 | Notch 1 | 5′-CGGGTCCACCAGTTTGAATG-3′ |
| 5′-GTTGTATTGGTTCGGCACCAT-3′ | ||
| 9 | Notch 2 | 5′-GTGCAGGAATTGGAAAGTTGGA-3′ |
| 5′-GGCCGCTTCAGAGGAAAAG-3′ | ||
| 10 | Notch 3 | 5′-GCCATCTCCCTTTGGGAACT-3′ |
| 5′-CCACATTTACAGGGACATAAAGGA-3′ | ||
| 11 | Notch 4 | 5′-CCAAGAAATGCCCATAAACCAA-3′ |
| 5′-GCCTTTTAATGGGTAATCATTTTTG-3′ | ||
| 12 | Jagged 1 | 5′-CCAGGTCTTACTACGGAGCACATT-3′ |
| 5′-CGCAAGCGATGTAGATTGAATATT-3′ | ||
| 13 | Hey 2 | 5′-TACTTTGACGCACACGCTCT-3′ |
| 5′-CGCAAGTGCTGAGATGAGAC-3′ | ||
| 14 | Hes1 | 5′-GGACATTCTGGAAATGACAGTGAA-3′ |
| 5′AGCGCAGCCGTCATCTG-3′ |
Clinical and virological characteristics of subjects recruited in the study.
| Parameters | Non-HBV-HCC | HBV-HCC | CHBV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Non-HBV-HCC vs. HBV-HCC | ||||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 59 ± 8.5 | 54 ± 10 | 36 ± 13.6 | NS |
| Sex (M:F) | 17 : 5 | 14 : 3 | 9 : 1 | NS |
| AST (IU/ml), median (range) | 97.5 (71–763) | 109.5 (73–229) | 70.5 (41–966) | NS |
| ALT (IU/ml), median (range) | 73 (51–402) | 71 (51–229) | 72 (46–872) | NS |
| HBsAg | Non-reactive | Reactive | Reactive | – |
| HBeAg | – | – | Reactive | – |
| AFP (ng/ml), median (range) | 13.5 (2.4–18,900) | 943.5 (2.24–575736.6) | 38.2 (2.45–120.6) | 0.047*, 0.045** |
| HBV DNA (IU/ml), median (range) | – | 1645 (77.6–7.52 × 106) | 20.6 × 106 (10–1.10 × 108) | 0.04** |
*P value: Non-HBV-HCC vs. HBV-HCC; **P value: HBV-HCC vs. CHBV.
Figure 1(A) Alpha-fetoprotein level is a predictive marker of HCC and its values are high in HBVHCC than non-HBV-HCC. (B–D) Representative flow-cytometric dot plots and scatter plots showing differential frequencies of total lymphocytes, CD4, and CD8 T cells. Total lymphocyte counts and CD8+ T cells were decreased in HBV-HCC than non-HBV-HCC and CHBV. There was no significant difference in CD4+ T cell counts in between all the three groups.
Figure 2(A) CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs were analyzed using CD25 and CD127 markers on CD4+ gated population of T cells. Representative flow-cytometric dot plots and scatter plot showing the frequencies of CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs in all three groups. (B) Scatter plot shows increased expression of FoXP3 positive CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs in HBV-HCC than non-HBVHCC (P = 0.002).
Figure 3Tregs from HBV-HCC are functionally more suppressive. T conventional cells from HBV-HCC and non-HBV-HCC patients were CFSE labeled and cultured for 72 h with patient matched Tregs (1:10 for Tregs: Tcon) to assess CFSE dilution. Tregs from HBV-HCC showed significantly high suppression of Tcon after 72 h of co-culture (right panel) as compared to Tregs from non-HBV-HCC.
Figure 4(A,B) Representative flow-cytometric dot plots showing the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β in Tregs in three patient groups. Scatter plot shows that both IL-10 and TGF-β were expressed significantly more in Tregs of HBV-HCC patients than both non-HBV-HCC and CHBV. (C) qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the overexpression of TGF-β in HBV-HCC than non-HBV-HCC. (D) Immunohistochemistry analysis also confirmed the over expression of TGF-β in HBV-HCC than non-HBV-HCC liver tissues. 40× magnification was used.
Figure 5Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased expression of CD25 and FoxP3 in HBV-HCC patients (A,B) than non-HBV-HCC patients (C,D), Magnification: 40×.
Figure 6(A–C) Representative flow-cytometric dot plots and scatter plot showing increased expression of PD1 on CD4+CD25+ Tregs of non-HBV-HCC patients than HBV-HCC patients. (D) Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded sections confirming the increased expression of PD1 and PDL1 (c,d) in non-HBV-HCC than HBV-HCC (a,b) patients. Magnification: 40×.