Literature DB >> 25767428

Effect of preservation of corticoperiosteal attachment on bone healing at osteotomy sites after ulna-shortening osteotomy.

Yoshitaka Hamada1, Koichi Sairyo2, Naohito Hibino3, Anna Kobayashi1, Ryosuke Sato2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although precise ulna-shortening osteotomy is popular, the procedure sometimes results in delayed union or nonunion. The periosteum including the inner cambium layer plays an important role in fracture healing. We tested the hypothesis that preservation of the corticoperiosteal attachment may accelerate healing at osteotomy sites after ulna-shortening osteotomy.
METHODS: We performed a chart review of 32 patients who underwent ulna-shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome or triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in a retrospective single-surgeon series. Of the 32 cases, the periosteum was preserved in 21 osteotomies performed from April 2009 onwards (periosteum-preserved group) and not preserved in 11 osteotomies performed before April 2009 (control group). Following sugar tong immobilization, patients in both groups used a short wrist supporter during the first two postoperative weeks (POW) and up to at least four POW. Union of the osteotomy site was assessed at 2-week intervals using radiographs taken at three different projections until 12 POW and at 4-week intervals thereafter until 24 POW. Ulna shortening was performed using a transverse osteotomy cut with the aid of a commercially available compression device.
RESULTS: All osteotomies achieved complete union except in one case in the control group. The mean interval to complete cortical union was 7.7 weeks in the periosteum-preserved group and 9.5 weeks in the control group. The corresponding mean times for endosteal union were 15.6 and 21.8 weeks. The periosteum-preserved group had reduced times for both types of union but only the endosteal union time was significantly different from the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the corticoperiosteal attachment significantly shortened the endosteal union time. Our results indicate that preservation of the periosteum may accelerate bone healing after ulna-shortening osteotomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone healing; Preservation of corticoperiosteal attachment; Ulna-shortening osteotomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767428      PMCID: PMC4349831          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9662-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  17 in total

1.  Vascularised corticoperiosteal grafts from the medial femoral condyle for difficult non-unions of the upper limb.

Authors:  F Del Piñal; F J García-Bernal; J Regalado; H Ayala; L Cagigal; A Studer
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2007-01-19

2.  A comparative study of ulnar-shortening osteotomy by the freehand technique versus the Rayhack technique.

Authors:  T M Sunil; Thomas W Wolff; Luis R Scheker; Steven J McCabe; Amit Gupta
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Vascularized bone graft from the supracondylar region of the femur.

Authors:  Kazuteru Doi; Yasunori Hattori
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.425

4.  Free vascularized thin corticoperiosteal graft.

Authors:  K Sakai; K Doi; S Kawai
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on bone healing at osteotomy sites after forearm bone shortening.

Authors:  Atsushi Urita; Norimasa Iwasaki; Makoto Kondo; Yasuhiko Nishio; Tamotsu Kamishima; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  [Angioarchitecture of the ulna and radius and their practical relevance].

Authors:  J Menck; H W Schreiber; T Hertz; N Bürgel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

7.  Expanding the utility of modified vascularized femoral periosteal bone-flaps: An analysis of its form and a comparison with a conventional-bone-graft.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Hamada; Naohito Hibino; Anna Kobayashi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-02-04

8.  Vascularized periosteal transfer from the medial femoral condyle: is it compulsory to include the cortical bone?

Authors:  Manuel R Vegas; Pedro Delgado; Ignacio Roger; Ramon Carosini
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 9.  The treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David I Katz; John G Seiler; T Christopher Bond
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2010

10.  Clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Masahiro Tatebe; Takaaki Shinohara; Nobuyuki Okui; Michiro Yamamoto; Hitoshi Hirata; Toshihiko Imaeda
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time-Dependent Recovery of Outcome Parameters in Ulnar Shortening for Positive Ulnar Variance: A Prospective Case Series.

Authors:  Gernot Schmidle; Tobias Kastenberger; Rohit Arora
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-04-09

2.  A Dorsal Approach for Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy.

Authors:  Bo J W Notermans; Wiesje Maarse; Arnold H Schuurman
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2017-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.