Literature DB >> 25767385

Calcium-activated gene transfection from DNA/poly(amic acid-co-imide) complexes.

Szu-Yuan Wu1, Li-Ting Chang2, Sydeny Peng3, Hsieh-Chih Tsai2.   

Abstract

In this study, we synthesized a pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">waterclass="Chemical">pan>-soluble class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">poly(amic acid-co-imide) (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PA-I) from ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride (EDTA) and 2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylamine) that possesses comparable transfection efficiency to that of polyethylenimine (PEI), when prepared in combination with divalent calcium cations. The polycondensation of monomers afforded poly(amic acid) (PA) precursors, and subsequent thermal imidization resulted in the formation of PA-I. At a polymer/DNA ratio (indicated by the molar ratio of nitrogen in the polymer to phosphate in DNA) of 40, complete retardation of the DNA band was observed by gel electrophoresis, indicating the strong association of DNA with PA-I. A zeta potential of -22 mV was recorded for the PA-I polymer solution, and no apparent cytotoxicity was observed at concentrations up to 500 μg·mL(-1). In the presence of divalent Ca(2+), the transfection efficiency of PA-I was higher than that of PA, due to the formation of a copolymer/Ca(2+)/DNA polyplex and the reduction in negative charge due to thermal cyclization. Interestingly, a synergistic effect of Ca(2+) and the synthesized copolymer on DNA transfection was observed. The use of Ca(2+) or copolymer alone resulted in unsatisfactory delivery, whereas the formation of three-component polyplexes synergistically increased DNA transfection. Our findings demonstrated that a PA-I/Ca(2+)/DNA polyplex could serve as a promising candidate for gene delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene carrier; poly(amic acid); polyimide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767385      PMCID: PMC4354692          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S76502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


Introduction

Nonviral gene carriers, including pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">polymerclass="Chemical">pan>ic vectors, are considered to be safer alternatives to viral-based gene delivery vehicles. Negatively charged DNA and cationic class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">polymers, such as class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">polyethylenimine (PEI) and poly(lysine), are capable of condensing into a polyplex and efficiently interacting with the negatively charged cell membrane. Upon internalization, the polyplex dissociates, and the DNA is released prior to lysosomal degradation. Unfortunately, their high positive charge density disrupts cell and mitochondrial membranes, leading to cell necrosis and apoptosis; the inherent cytotoxicity of these cationic polymers, both in vitro and in vivo, continues to be an unresolved problem.1,2 Equally of concern is the binding of negatively charged serum proteins to positively charged complexes, initiating aggregation and reducing transfection.3,4 In order to realize the actual clinical potential of these carriers, attempts have been made to modulate the surface charge density by such means as bioconjugation, oxidation, and the addition of anionic materials. In one study, the succinylation of PEI introduced negatively charged carboxylate groups, which lowered the polymer cytotoxicity tenfold while increasing the knockdown percentage of a target luciferase gene.5 In another study, peroxidase oxidization of amine groups lowered the charge density and provided a simple strategy for modification of PEI.6 The incorporation of poly(propylacrylic acid) in commercially available cationic liposomes was shown to increase the delivery of plasmid DNA in vitro and in vivo.7 Schlegal et al identified seven anionic nontoxic polymers, most bearing negatively charged carboxylate groups, including poly(glutamic acid), poly(acrylic acid), and hyaluronic acid, that lowered cellular toxicity and increased gene-silencing efficiencies.8 Furthermore, endosomal escape is a key step in transfection, and when polymer and DNA are too tightly bound, the genetic material cannot be released into the cytosol – one study showed that the addition of anionic liposomes to lipid-based formulations led to membrane destabilization and liberation of cargo DNA.9 Taking together these considerations, it is practical to develop new delivery systems as an alternative to cationic carriers. The complete substitution of cationic materials with anionic materials is another approach to eliminating strong positive charge.10,11 Divalent cations can be used as mediators to reduce negative charge of DNA, and therefore eliminating the need for high cations charge of pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">polymerclass="Chemical">pan>.12 class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">Calcium cations, in class="Chemical">particular, have been shown to mediate endosomal escape and cytosolic stability, and to enhance DNA uptake by interacting with nuclear pore complexes.13,14 Elsewhere, the use of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">divalent calcium cations enhanced the transfection efficiency of plasmid DNA-lipid complexes to a variety of cell lines by three- to 20-fold.15 Use of polymers containing carboxylate functional groups is another strategy set forth for driving complex formations through interactions with divalent cations.16 class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Poly(amic acid) (PA) is a negatively charged class="Chemical">paclass="Chemical">pan>n class="Chemical">copolymer prepared from the polycondensation of diamines and dianhydrides. Imidization of PA, either thermally or chemically, affords poly(imides). Taking advantage of the synthesis procedure, it becomes possible to control the charge density of the final product by varying the degree of imidization, through reaction temperature and time.17,18 Therefore, the modulation of poly(amic acid-co-imide) (PA-I) charge is possible without the addition of a second polymer. PA-I is also thermally and mechanically stable, while exhibiting good biocompatibility.19–21 Strong intermolecular interactions between adjacent donor nitrogen and acceptor carbonyl groups lead to the stacking of PA-Is. Furthermore, the presence of carbonyl groups allows the PA-Is to interact with nearby –NH2 groups, commonly observed in biomaterials, through hydrogen bonding.22,23 However, the biological applications of PA-I have been limited by its insolubility in water. Water solubility is a prerequisite for preparing gene delivery systems, and the modification of water-insoluble polymers, such as chitosan, has initiated extensive related research.24 Recently, the chemical and physical evaluation of a water-soluble PA-I was reported, thereby casting light on the potential of PA-I for gene delivery.25 Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of a pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">waterclass="Chemical">pan>-soluble class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">PA-I derived from class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride (EDTA) and 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy) bis(ethylamine) (EOEM), through polycondensation and subsequent imidization of its PA precursor. A gel retardation assay was used to verify polyplex formation between the copolymers and DNA. Transfection efficiencies of the synthesized PA-I and PA precursors were evaluated alone and in the presence of divalent calcium cations. These results may serve to elucidate the potential of water-soluble PA-Is as gene delivery vectors.

Methods

Materials

Reagents, such as pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">EDTA dianhydrideclass="Chemical">pan>, class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">EOEM, and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp (St Louis, MO, USA). DMSO was dried over calcium hydride and distilled under vacuum. Plasmid-encoding enhanced green fluorescence protein (GFP) (pEGFP-N1) was donated by Dr Hu at the Department of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.

Amplification of plasmid DNA

The pEGFclass="Chemical">P-N1 class="Chemical">plasmid was introduced into class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Escherichia coli strain DH5α (Invitrogen; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Briefly, transformed DH5α was grown in 500 mL Luria-Bertani broth containing 250 μg of antibiotics per mL and then incubated at 37°C, with shaking at 200 rpm, for 16 hours. Plasmid DNA was purified from DH5α, using AxyPrep™ Plasmid Maxiprep Kits. The purity of plasmid DNA was certified by an absorbance ratio of 1.8 at OD260/OD280. The plasmid was stored at −20°C before use.

Synthesis of PA and PA-I copolymer

Briefly, pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">EOEMclass="Chemical">pan> was dissolved in dry class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">DMSO with constant stirring. An equimolar amount of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">EDTA dianhydride was added, and the mixture was stirred under N2 atmosphere for 24 hours. PA was precipitated in acetone, washed, and filtered three times to remove unreacted monomers. The ring closure reaction was carried out at 110°C for 3 hours to yield the final product, PA-I.

Characterization of copolymers

The molecular structures of the monomers and products were verified by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">1Hclass="Chemical">pan> NMR) spectra, acquired on a Bruker AVANCE III class="Chemical">papan>n class="Disease">HD 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) with class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">DMSO-d6 as solvent. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 6700 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA), using samples of PA and PA-I prepared on CaF2 disks by the solvent-casting method. Zeta potential measurements of 0.1% polymer solutions (w/v) were carried out with a Horiba SZ-100 nanoparticle analyzer (Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan).

Curve fitting of the contents of PA in the PA-I polymer

All curve fitting was performed and their integrated areas measured by Originpan class="Chemical">Pro 8 software (OriginLab Corclass="Chemical">poration, Northamclass="Chemical">pton, MA, USA). Overlaclass="Chemical">pclass="Chemical">ping class="Chemical">peaks were resolved by using Gaussian function.

Gel retardation assay

Gel electrophoresis was performed with class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">coclass="Chemical">polymerclass="Chemical">pan>/DNA ratios of 1:1, 10:1, 30:1, and 40:1. Samples were preclass="Chemical">pared by mixing nuclease-free pan class="Chemical">polymer solutions with equal volumes of plasmid DNA at various ratios. The samples were allowed to stand for 20 minutes, to allow complex formation, prior to the addition of pan class="Chemical">Tris-acetate-EDTA (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">TAE) running buffer. Next, the samples were loaded into the wells of a 0.6% agarose gel, and electrophoresis was carried out using 80 V current, in TAE running buffer containing 1 mM EDTA. The DNA bands were visualized with ethidium bromide.

Cytotoxicity

pan class="Chemical">pan class="Sclass="Chemical">pecies">Humanclass="Chemical">pan> class="Chemical">papan>n class="Disease">embryonic kidney cells (class="Chemical">pan class="CellLine">293T) were obtained from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute (Hsinchu, Taiwan) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well, 24 hours prior to incubation with the copolymer solutions, in concentrations ranging from 16 to 1,000 μg·mL−1. Cells were further incubated with 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent for another 4 hours to allow formazan crystal formation. Formazan crystals were dissolved with DMSO (200 μL), and absorbance values were read at 570 nm using a Synergy HT plate reader (Bio Tek Instruments Inc, Winooski, VT, USA). Cell viability was defined by:

Transfection efficiency

pan class="Chemical">pan class="CellLine">293Tclass="Chemical">pan> cells were seeded in 24-well plates, at a density of 1×105 cells/well, 24 hours prior to testing. The media was witclass="Chemical">papan>n class="Disease">hdrawn, and the attached cells were washed with class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Polyplexes were prepared by mixing appropriate amounts of PA or PA-I with DNA and then adding CaCl2. Two different polymer concentrations, 30 μg/50 μL and 40 μg/50 μL, were prepared with filtered nonserum media and were designated as PA30, PA40, PA-I30, and PA-I40. Plasmid solution, at 1 μg/50 μL, was added dropwise to the copolymer solution and incubated for 2.5 hours. In the Ca2+-containing samples, an equal volume of CaCl2 solution was added and reacted for 1 hour. Then, the complex solution (100 μL) was added to the wells and incubated with 293T cells. After 4 hours transfection, the media was removed from the wells, and serum media (500 μL) was added after washing with PBS. As a positive control, 25 kD PEI (at optimized copolymer-to-DNA ratio of 10) was used, according to the standard protocol. Attached cells were assayed for fluorescence expression using a fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

Calcium-induced decomplexation by gel retardation assay

class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Polyplexes formed (as described above), at class="Chemical">paclass="Chemical">pan>n class="Chemical">copolymer-to-DNA ratios of 30 and 40, were incubated along with 15 mM of calcium chloride at 37°C for up to 4 hours. As a control, naked plasmid DNA was incubated in 15 mM of calcium chloride for the same time frame. Next, the samples were loaded into the wells of a 0.6% agarose gel, and electrophoresis was carried out using 100 V current in TAE running buffer containing 1 mM EDTA. The DNA bands were visualized with ethidium bromide.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterization of PA and PA-I copolymers

The pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">polyclass="Chemical">pan>condensation of class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">EDTA and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">EOEM afforded PA polymers, as illustrated in Figure 1. Next, a thermally initiated polycyclodehydration reaction of PA resulted in ring closure and the formation of PA-I copolymers. The characteristics (molecular weight and polydispersity index) of the prepared polymers, which were examined by gel permeation chromotography, are shown in Table 1. The obtained PA and PA-I were characterized by 1H NMR as shown in Figure 2. In Figure 2A, the ethylene protons of EDTA are identified by chemical shifts at 2.71, 3.23, and 3.36 ppm. A sharp peak at 3.5 ppm and the triplet peaks at 3.42 and 3.27 ppm correspond to ethylene protons from the EOEM segment. The amide NH is present further downfield, at 8.0 ppm. In Figure 2B, the imidization of PA is shown to have resulted in cyclic imide groups, which resonate at 3.3 ppm. The resonance at 3.9 ppm represents the ethylene protons in proximity to EDTA, while the ethylene protons of EOEM are present at 3.27, 3.50, and 3.42 ppm. The FT-IR spectra for PA and PA-I are shown in Figure 3. The amide bands at 1,554 and 1,645 cm−1 can be attributed to the amide bonds in PA but were absent in the PA-I spectra, supporting our notion that the preparation conditions led to almost complete cyclization. The C=O groups of the imide rings in PA-I gave rise to bands at 1,669 and 1,776 cm−1, indicating a cyclic five-membered ring and confirming ring closure. The disappearance of the –COOH peak at 1,720 cm−1 further verified the cyclization and formation of the polyimide ring. These results are in agreement with earlier studies.26–28
Figure 1

Synthesis of hydrophilic polyimide through the polycondensation of EOEM and EDTA dianhydride.

Abbreviations: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride; EOEM, 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylamine); PA, poly(amic acid); PI, poly(imide).

Table 1

Molecular weight of PA and PA-I, characterized by GPC examination

PolymerMolecular weight (Mn)PDI
PA6,7001.62
PA-I5,4001.83

Abbreviations: GPC, gel permeation chromatography; PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide); PDI, polydispersity index.

Figure 2

1H NMR spectra of (A) PA and (B) PA-I.

Abbreviations: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; 1H NMR, proton nuclear magnetic resonance; PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide).

Figure 3

FT-IR spectra of PA and PA-I.

Abbreviations: FT-IR, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide).

Zeta potential and DNA binding

The zeta potential is an important consideration in gene delivery because carrier charge is closely related to transfection efficiency and pan class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">toxicityclass="Chemical">pan>. The zeta potentials for 0.1% PA and class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">PA-I copolymer solutions were −52.1 and −22.8 mV, respectively. class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Carboxylate groups on the PA conferred negative charge to the polymer, and the formation of the PA-I ring increased the zeta potential. Unconverted carboxylic acids may have been the contributing factor to the negative zeta potential of PA-I, which is consistent with the FT-IR results. Excessive conversion of PA to PA-I would render the product insoluble due to the high degree of crosslinking between PA-I chains.29 We found that processing conditions of 100°C for 3 hours resulted in acceptable water-soluble copolymers. The conversion degree of PA-I was calculated from relative functional groups of PA and PA-I:30 where represents the absorption reference imide peak at 1,380 cm−1 due to C-N stretching vibration, and represents the absorption peak at 1,500 cm−1 due to C-C stretching vibration on the monomer backbone. The relative band area was calculated using curve fitting, in Origin software. The conversion degree of PA-I was 36.9 % and was used for the following study. Complex formation between the copolymers and DNA was examined by agarose gel electrophoresis, as shown in Figure 4. Copolymer to DNA ratios are written as N/P, which indicate the molar ratio of nitrogen (N) in the polymers to phosphate (P) in DNA. As the copolymer/DNA (N/P) ratio increased, the binding strength between the copolymer and DNA increased, thereby limiting the mobility of DNA during electrophoresis. Poor band retardation was observed in the PA samples due to repulsion between the highly negatively charged PA and the like-charged DNA. However, near retardation of DNA was observed at a mixing ratio above 30 as compared with the mobility of free DNA for both PA and PA-I. One possible explanation is that, in addition to electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding drive the formation of stable complexes; therefore, DNA retention is observed despite the negatively charged characters of PA and PA-I. The hydrophobic modification of chitosan increased the retardation of DNA, due to hydrophobic interactions and particle formation.31 Similar success in DNA binding was observed with negatively charged poloxamine nanospheres and was attributed to its amphiphilic nature of DNA.32 In another study, the incorporation of hydrophobic cholesterol into a water-soluble lipoplex enhanced luciferase transfection efficiency by increasing polymer-DNA interaction.33 More directly, hydrophobic groups were conjugated to PEI, and the transfection efficiency positively correlated with the degree of modification, up to a certain level.34 N/P ratios of 30 and 40 displayed complete retardation for both PA and PA-I, and these ratios were selected for subsequent studies.
Figure 4

Agarose gel electrophoresis retardation of (A) PA and (B) PA-I, at various polymer/DNA weight ratios.

Abbreviations: PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide).

Cytotoxicity of copolymers

class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">Cytotoxicityclass="Chemical">pan> is a major concern in gene delivery and arises from class="Chemical">parameters such as molecular weight and cationic charge density.35 Prior to transfection, it is crucial to verify whether the pan class="Chemical">copolymer alone is toxic to cells. pan class="Disease">Cytotoxicity studies of the PA and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PA-I copolymers, with PEI as a control, were performed on human embryonic kidney (293T) cells, and the effects of various concentrations of copolymers (16–1,000 μg·mL−1) were studied (Figure 5). As anticipated, the PEI copolymer exhibited significant toxicity, with 52.3%±6.6% cell viability observed at a concentration of 16 μg·mL−1. In contrast, greater than 90% cell viability (93.5%±2.5% and 92.5%±3.6% for PA and PA-I, respectively) was observed for the synthesized copolymers at concentrations up to 500 μg·mL−1. This is in agreement with the accepted knowledge that cytotoxicity is most strongly associated with extensive cationic charge density. The zeta potential of PEI was approximately +35 mV. Positively charged carriers are known to aggregate on cell surfaces and disturb cellular functions, thereby leading to significant cell death.36 These results demonstrate that both materials are nontoxic to cells and reveal no significant difference in the cytotoxicities of PA and PA-I.
Figure 5

Cytotoxicity of PA, PA-I, and PEI at various concentrations, for 293T cells.

Abbreviations: PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide); PEI, polyethyleneimine.

The transfection efficiency of class="Chemical">PA and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PA-I copolymer-DNA complexes was studied alone and in the presence of divalent cations, with PEI as the positive control, as shown in Figures 6. DNA coupled with Ca2+ exhibited increased transfection compared with naked DNA, in accord with literature reports.13,37,38 Ca2+ was selected because compared with other divalent cations, including Mg2+, a more dramatic increase in transfection efficiency was observed, mainly due to a smaller hydrodynamic radius.39–40 Although PA and PA-I copolymers coupled with DNA alone showed inferior transfection efficiency, the addition of 15 mM Ca2+ resulted in a synergistic effect. In all cases, PA-I exhibited significantly higher transfection efficiency than did PA. The extensive negative charge density present in PA may have prevented complex formation between the like-charge DNA and PA copolymer. In Figure 7, PA-I40 with 15 mM Ca2+ resulted in the highest fluorescence intensity. Since EDTA is a divalent ion-chelating agent, the EDTA derivatives in PA and PA-I may interact strongly with Ca2+, therefore strengthening the copolymer/Ca2+/DNA polyplex. However, the addition of 30 mM Ca2+ led to a decrease in transfection efficiency. This may be attributed to the fact that although calcium was shown to condense copolymer/DNA complexes by interacting with both amines and phosphate, it also acted simultaneously as a competitive inhibitor of amine/phosphate interactions at high concentration.41 Srinivasan et al showed that excessive Ca2+ concentration (beyond 25 mM) led to particle aggregation and decreased transfection efficiency; therefore, the concentration of cations needs to be adequately controlled.39 On the other hand, PA-I significantly outperformed PA in terms of transfection efficiency, in the presence of 15 mM Ca2+. This result, taken with the zeta potential values, conforms to expectations of the effect of moderated negative charge. A higher N/P ratio also corresponded to higher transfection efficiency, due to the formation of more compact polyplexes. This is in agreement with the retardation trend observed in the gel retardation experiment.
Figure 6

Typical fluorescence images of 293T cells transfected by PA/DNA, PA-I/DNA, and PEI-25K/DNA, in the presence of 0, 15, and 30 mM Ca2+. 293T cells were incubated with different formulations for 4 hours, and the GFP expression was evaluated after 48 hours of transfection.

Abbreviations: GFP, green fluorescent protein; PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide); PEI, polyethyleneimine.

Figure 7

Transfection efficiency of PA/DNA, PA-I/DNA, and PEI-25K/DNA, in 293T cells in the presence of 15 and 30 mM Ca2+.

Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=6). **P<0.05 and ***P<0.01, by the Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide); PEI, polyethyleneimine; RFU, relative fluorescence unit; SD, standard deviation.

DNA-release ability

In order to realize the superior transfection efficiency of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PA-I and class="Chemical">paclass="Chemical">pan>n class="Chemical">PA copolymers coupled with DNA in the presence of divalent calcium cations, the release of plasmid DNA from polyplexes was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Figure 8 shows the migration of DNA, in both PA-I and PA groups, in the presence of divalent calcium cations. These results suggested that DNA can be released from both PA and PA-I polyplexes in Ca2+ solution and that DNA was more efficiently released from PA-I polyplexes. These results were consistent with fluorescence expression assays. These experiments also showed that the cationic part of polyimide promoted the dissociation of polymer/DNA complex (PA-I/DNA) to provide high gene transfection efficiency after incubation with cells. Moreover the particle size and zeta potential of polyplexes were also examined in the presence and absence of calcium ions, as shown in Table 2. The size of polyplexes was approximately 150 nm for DNA/PA and DNA/PA-I. The size changed dramatically when calcium ions was added to the solution. The increase in particle size indicated disruption of polyplexes by calcium ions. In addition, the zeta potential of the polyplexes did not change significantly in the presence of calcium ions.
Figure 8

The capability of our copolymer/Ca2+/DNA to release plasmid DNA was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis (100 V, 10 minutes).

Abbreviations: PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide).

Table 2

The particle size and zeta potential of DNA/PA and DNA/PA-I, in the presence and absence of calcium ion

Polymer complexDNA/PA-I (1:30)DNA/PA-I (1:40)DNA/PA (1:30)DNA/PA (1:40)
Particle size (nm)153.5142.3168.5158.5
Zeta potential (mV)−18.5−19.6−40.2−42.5
Polymer complex +15 mM Ca2+DNA/PA–I (1:30)DNA/PA–I (1:40)DNA/PA (1:30)DNA/PA (1:40)
Particle size (nm)565.2525.2425.2439.8
Zeta potential (mV)−25.2−24.5−49.5−50.7

Abbreviations: PA, poly(amic acid); PA-I, poly(amic acid-co-imide).

Interaction of Ca2+ with PA

The above evidence showed that decomplexation of DNA pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">class="Chemical">polyclass="Chemical">pan>plexes was induced in the presence of class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">calcium ions and therefore resulted in efficient DNA delivery. The interaction of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Ca2+ and the copolymer was examined by FT-IR. EDTA is a versatile agent that can form four or six bonds with a metal ion. In the calcium complex, [Ca(EDTA)]2−, EDTA is a tetradentate ligand, and chelation involves two nitrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms. In our study, PA was polymerized from EDTA and EOEM, with EDTA derivatives still present in the polymer chain. Therefore, PA and PA-I could be chelated with calcium ion and release DNA from the complex. The EDTA-chelate-calcium and PA-chelated-calcium structures were shown in Figure 9. In Figure 10, the absorption spectra of Ca2+-free and Ca2+-binding forms of PA was characterized by FT-IR. The amide bonds of PA exhibited bands at 1,569 and 1,652 cm−1. When Ca2+ was added to PA, a new band was found at 1,588 cm−1, which was assigned to the Ca2+-binding COO–group.42 This result proved that calcium ion was coordinated with the COO–group of PA. This coordination between polymer and metal ion is likely the reason why DNA can be released from polymer complexes in the presence of calcium ion.
Figure 9

The molecule structure of calcium chelated with EDTA and PA.

Abbreviations: EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic dianhydride; PA, poly(amic acid).

Figure 10

FT-IR spectra of PA and Ca2+-binding PA.

Abbreviations: FT-IR, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; PA, poly(amic acid).

Conclusion

In summary, we designed a pan class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">waterclass="Chemical">pan>-soluble class="Chemical">papan>n class="Chemical">PA-I that is nontoxic and exhibits potential to be utilized as a nonviral gene carrier. Through thermal cyclization, the negatively charged PA was converted to the more moderate class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PA-I, which exhibited low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficiency. The addition of Ca2+ significantly increased transfection, due to the possible formation of a ternary polyplex containing PA-I, Ca2+, and DNA. The devised system exhibited dual control based on the imidization conditions and Ca2+ concentration. In the past, the use of poly(imides) as delivery vehicles for biomolecules has been limited by their poor water solubility. The development of water-soluble PA-I therefore broadens their applications and initiates further explorations of PA-Is as biomaterials.
  29 in total

1.  Water-soluble lipopolymer for gene delivery.

Authors:  R I Mahato; S W Kim
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  Transfection of adherent and suspended cells by calcium phosphate.

Authors:  Martin Jordan; Florian Wurm
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability.

Authors:  P J Rousche; D S Pellinen; D P Pivin; J C Williams; R J Vetter; D R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Anionic polymers for decreased toxicity and enhanced in vivo delivery of siRNA complexed with cationic liposomes.

Authors:  Anne Schlegel; Céline Largeau; Pascal Bigey; Michel Bessodes; Kristell Lebozec; Daniel Scherman; Virginie Escriou
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as novel non-viral vectors for targeted gene delivery.

Authors:  Indrajit Roy; Susmita Mitra; Amarnath Maitra; Subho Mozumdar
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  Sequence-selective assembly of tweezer molecules on linear templates enables frameshift-reading of sequence information.

Authors:  Zhixue Zhu; Christine J Cardin; Yu Gan; Howard M Colquhoun
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 24.427

7.  Interaction of poly(ethylenimine)-DNA polyplexes with mitochondria: implications for a mechanism of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Giovanna Grandinetti; Nilesh P Ingle; Theresa M Reineke
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  pH-sensitive polymers that enhance intracellular drug delivery in vivo.

Authors:  Themis R Kyriakides; Charles Y Cheung; Niren Murthy; Paul Bornstein; Patrick S Stayton; Allan S Hoffman
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  "Soft" calcium crosslinks enable highly efficient gene transfection using TAT peptide.

Authors:  Abdulgader Baoum; Sheng-Xue Xie; Amir Fakhari; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis.

Authors:  Dagmar Fischer; Youxin Li; Barbara Ahlemeyer; Josef Krieglstein; Thomas Kissel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced Gene Delivery in Bacterial and Mammalian Cells Using PEGylated Calcium Doped Magnetic Nanograin.

Authors:  Ehsan Hashemi; Hossein Mahdavi; Jafar Khezri; Farideh Razi; Mehdi Shamsara; Abbas Farmany
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-12-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.